Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100419
Arnaud Storck , Marie Thérèse Abiwarde , Gaelle Hardy , Anne-Sophie Lebre , Sophie Scheidecker , Maria Cristina Antal , Mathieu Anheim , Thomas Wirth
{"title":"Confirmation of biallelic VPS11 variants as a cause of complex dystonic syndrome","authors":"Arnaud Storck , Marie Thérèse Abiwarde , Gaelle Hardy , Anne-Sophie Lebre , Sophie Scheidecker , Maria Cristina Antal , Mathieu Anheim , Thomas Wirth","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100419","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100419","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100412
Alexander Calvano , Dilara Bingoel , Laura Beccaria , Fabian Bodlee , Lars Timmermann , Natalia Kurka , David J. Pedrosa
We describe a young woman with a novel homozygous PARK7 mutation causing an early-onset and progressive parkinsonism-dystonia syndrome with poor dopaminergic response. Clinical heterogeneity among homozygous mutation carriers emphasises that molecular characterisation of novel variants and detailed phenotyping remain indispensable for enhancing early diagnosis and the understanding of the multifaceted role of DJ1 in the context of neurodegeneration.
{"title":"Parkinsonism-dystonia syndrome due to a PARK7 gene mutation","authors":"Alexander Calvano , Dilara Bingoel , Laura Beccaria , Fabian Bodlee , Lars Timmermann , Natalia Kurka , David J. Pedrosa","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100412","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100412","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We describe a young woman with a novel homozygous PARK7 mutation causing an early-onset and progressive parkinsonism-dystonia syndrome with poor dopaminergic response. Clinical heterogeneity among homozygous mutation carriers emphasises that molecular characterisation of novel variants and detailed phenotyping remain indispensable for enhancing early diagnosis and the understanding of the multifaceted role of DJ1 in the context of neurodegeneration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100422
Wenming Lu , Longxiang Yan , Chuangguo Li, Kai Wang, Qijing Wang, Sisi Xu, Benguo Wang
<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disease with a high prevalence worldwide, leading to motor and non-motor symptoms. Moreover, PD presents a progressive aggravation alongside time, the middle and late patients in PD requires the use of a variety of anti-Parkinson’s drugs with obvious side effects, which bring serious impact on the quality of life of patients. In recent years, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), as a kind of non-invasive neuromodulation therapy, has drawn increasing interest from neurologists, and has been effectively utilized to alleviate both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD. However, the treatment protocols and therapeutic effects of rTMS for PD patients are inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of rTMS therapy in patients with PD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We will perform a comprehensive search in the following electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane, without language restrictions, from their inception to September 2024. This review protocol was formulated according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The Cochrane risk of bias tool is utilized to assess the risk of bias. Finally, the effect size was expressed by a standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 45 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of enrolled studies indicated that both primary and secondary indicators had improved. Subgroup analysis showed that high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) targeting the supplementary motor area (SMD = − 0.56; 95 %CI = [−0.77, −0.36]; <em>p</em> < 0.00001), primary motor cortex (SMD: −1.65; 95 %CI = [−2.35, −0.95]; <em>p</em> < 0.00001), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (SMD: −0.68; 95 %CI = [−1.16, −0.21]; <em>p</em> = 0.005) yielded a significant reduction in motor UPDRS-III scores, compared to the sham group. In addition, HF‐rTMS over left DLPFC or intermittent theta burst stimulation over left DLPFC may benefit cognition. Furtherly, the subgroup analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory scores indicated HF-rTMS over the left DLPFC was a beneficial treatment for depressive symptoms in PD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The meta-analysis showed that rTMS was effective and safe in the treatment of PD, improving motor function (such as a decrease in UPDRS-III total scores, subscores of UPDRS-III, and FOG-Q scores) in patients with PD and leading to improvement in cognitive function and depression (such as an increase in MocA scores and a decrease BDI scores). Although the results of the subgroup analysis provide a valuable reference for the selection of rTMS for clinical application, further larger multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled studies with a large number of participants
帕金森病(PD)是一种多因素的神经退行性疾病,在世界范围内具有很高的患病率,导致运动和非运动症状。而且随着时间的推移,PD呈进行性加重的趋势,中晚期患者需要使用多种副作用明显的抗帕金森药物,严重影响患者的生活质量。近年来,重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为一种无创的神经调节疗法越来越受到神经科医生的关注,并被有效地用于缓解PD的运动和非运动症状。然而,rTMS对PD患者的治疗方案和治疗效果并不一致。本荟萃分析旨在系统评价rTMS治疗PD患者的安全性和有效性。方法我们将对PubMed/Medline、Web of Science、EMBASE和Cochrane等电子数据库进行全面检索,检索时间从其建立到2024年9月,无语言限制。本评价方案是根据系统评价和荟萃分析方案首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)指南制定的。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。最后,效应大小用95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)表示。结果共纳入45项随机对照试验。纳入的研究结果表明,主要和次要指标都有所改善。亚组分析显示,与假手术组相比,针对辅助运动区(SMD = - 0.56; 95% CI = [- 0.77, - 0.36]; p < 0.00001)、初级运动皮质(SMD: - 1.65; 95% CI = [- 2.35, - 0.95]; p < 0.00001)和背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC) (SMD: - 0.68; 95% CI = [- 1.16, - 0.21]; p = 0.005)的高频rTMS (HF-rTMS)在运动UPDRS-III评分上显著降低。此外,高频- rTMS刺激左左DLPFC或间歇性θ波爆发刺激左DLPFC可能有利于认知。此外,贝克抑郁量表评分的亚组分析表明,左侧DLPFC上的HF-rTMS是PD患者抑郁症状的有益治疗方法。结论meta分析显示,rTMS治疗PD有效且安全,可改善PD患者的运动功能(如UPDRS-III总分、UPDRS-III亚分和FOG-Q评分降低),改善认知功能和抑郁(如MocA评分升高、BDI评分降低)。虽然亚组分析的结果为rTMS临床应用的选择提供了有价值的参考,但仍需要进一步进行更大规模的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照的大量受试者研究来验证这些结果。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function, depression, and cognitive dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Wenming Lu , Longxiang Yan , Chuangguo Li, Kai Wang, Qijing Wang, Sisi Xu, Benguo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100422","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100422","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disease with a high prevalence worldwide, leading to motor and non-motor symptoms. Moreover, PD presents a progressive aggravation alongside time, the middle and late patients in PD requires the use of a variety of anti-Parkinson’s drugs with obvious side effects, which bring serious impact on the quality of life of patients. In recent years, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), as a kind of non-invasive neuromodulation therapy, has drawn increasing interest from neurologists, and has been effectively utilized to alleviate both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD. However, the treatment protocols and therapeutic effects of rTMS for PD patients are inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of rTMS therapy in patients with PD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We will perform a comprehensive search in the following electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane, without language restrictions, from their inception to September 2024. This review protocol was formulated according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The Cochrane risk of bias tool is utilized to assess the risk of bias. Finally, the effect size was expressed by a standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 45 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of enrolled studies indicated that both primary and secondary indicators had improved. Subgroup analysis showed that high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) targeting the supplementary motor area (SMD = − 0.56; 95 %CI = [−0.77, −0.36]; <em>p</em> < 0.00001), primary motor cortex (SMD: −1.65; 95 %CI = [−2.35, −0.95]; <em>p</em> < 0.00001), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (SMD: −0.68; 95 %CI = [−1.16, −0.21]; <em>p</em> = 0.005) yielded a significant reduction in motor UPDRS-III scores, compared to the sham group. In addition, HF‐rTMS over left DLPFC or intermittent theta burst stimulation over left DLPFC may benefit cognition. Furtherly, the subgroup analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory scores indicated HF-rTMS over the left DLPFC was a beneficial treatment for depressive symptoms in PD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The meta-analysis showed that rTMS was effective and safe in the treatment of PD, improving motor function (such as a decrease in UPDRS-III total scores, subscores of UPDRS-III, and FOG-Q scores) in patients with PD and leading to improvement in cognitive function and depression (such as an increase in MocA scores and a decrease BDI scores). Although the results of the subgroup analysis provide a valuable reference for the selection of rTMS for clinical application, further larger multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled studies with a large number of participants ","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146022950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100413
Mason Dallegge , Sanjana Murthy , Don M. Tucker , Emmanuel During , Shannon O’Neill , Rachel Fremont , Joohi Jimenez-Shahed , Allison C. Waters
Among non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), sleep disruption is highly prevalent and may be a target for emerging neurotechnological approaches to treatment. Neuroanatomical and chemical changes in PD significantly impact sleep regulation, affecting both REM and non-REM sleep stages. These disturbances contribute to cognitive decline and disease progression, underscoring the critical need for effective management strategies. Sleep-focused neurotechnological advancements offer promising avenues for enhancing treatment of PD. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) successfully addresses maladaptive sleep behaviors exacerbated by PD and may be further enhanced with the use of sleep tracking technologies. At-home EEG-based monitoring complements CBT-I by facilitating real-time adjustments and optimizations and provides insights into personalized sleep management strategies. Additionally, neuromodulation techniques using direct stimulation aim to restore deep sleep (N3) by targeting specific brain regions affected by PD-related neurodegeneration. This article reviews the presentation of sleep disturbances in PD, explores the potential role for physiological tracking and neuromodulation in treatment of PD, and explores the use of consumer technologies to support personalized sleep management for patients and clinicians.
{"title":"Emerging neurotechnological approaches to management of sleep disturbances in Parkinson’s disease","authors":"Mason Dallegge , Sanjana Murthy , Don M. Tucker , Emmanuel During , Shannon O’Neill , Rachel Fremont , Joohi Jimenez-Shahed , Allison C. Waters","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100413","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100413","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Among non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), sleep disruption is highly prevalent and may be a target for emerging neurotechnological approaches to treatment. Neuroanatomical and chemical changes in PD significantly impact sleep regulation, affecting both REM and non-REM sleep stages. These disturbances contribute to cognitive decline and disease progression, underscoring the critical need for effective management strategies. Sleep-focused neurotechnological advancements offer promising avenues for enhancing treatment of PD. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) successfully addresses maladaptive sleep behaviors exacerbated by PD and may be further enhanced with the use of sleep tracking technologies. At-home EEG-based monitoring complements CBT-I by facilitating real-time adjustments and optimizations and provides insights into personalized sleep management strategies. Additionally, neuromodulation techniques using direct stimulation aim to restore deep sleep (N3) by targeting specific brain regions affected by PD-related neurodegeneration. This article reviews the presentation of sleep disturbances in PD, explores the potential role for physiological tracking and neuromodulation in treatment of PD, and explores the use of consumer technologies to support personalized sleep management for patients and clinicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Parkinson’s disease is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by a broad spectrum of motor and nonmotor symptoms. Recent studies suggest that the order of motor and nonmotor symptom development may indicate different subtypes of Parkinson’s disease. However, the temporal occurrence patterns of these symptoms remain unclear.
Objectives
This study aims to identify progression patterns of nonmotor symptoms and assess their relationships with the clinical characteristics of Parkinson’s disease.
Methods
We evaluated the prevalence and onset time of motor and nonmotor symptoms in 78 non-demented patients with Parkinson’s disease with a disease duration of less than 10 years, all of whom completed questionnaires regarding the presence of these symptoms and the timing of their appearance. We performed a hierarchical cluster analysis based on onset age and the relative onset times of motor and nonmotor symptoms. We then compared clinical characteristics, and cortical morphological changes among the resulting subgroups. Cortical morphology was analyzed in a subset of patients with available brain imaging and was treated as a sub-analysis.
Results
We identified three core clusters that exhibited different temporal patterns of symptom emergence in Parkinson’s disease. Cluster 1 was an older-onset group with early sleep problems, poor cognitive function. Cluster 2 was a younger-onset group with typical prodromal nonmotor symptom, mostly constipation. Cluster 3 was another older-onset group with poor cognitive function and many nonmotor symptoms present after the onset of motor symptoms. Structural brain imaging was available for most participants (58/78), and a subset of Cluster 1 showed more pronounced cortical atrophy.
Conclusions
Temporal patterns of nonmotor symptom emergence are heterogeneous and are highly influenced by onset age. Older-onset patients showed a higher burden of nonmotor symptoms and worse cognitive function, with symptom emergence occurring either before or after motor symptom onset. Characterizing these symptom-emergence patterns may help refine the clinical classification of Parkinson’s disease and support more individualized evaluation and management.
{"title":"Temporal patterns of motor and nonmotor symptom emergence in Parkinson’s disease: a cluster analysis","authors":"Yoko Sugimura , Toru Baba , Tomoko Totsune , Hideki Oizumi , Takafumi Hasegawa , Kyoko Suzuki , Atsushi Takeda","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100423","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100423","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parkinson’s disease is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by a broad spectrum of motor and nonmotor symptoms. Recent studies suggest that the order of motor and nonmotor symptom development may indicate different subtypes of Parkinson’s disease. However, the temporal occurrence patterns of these symptoms remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to identify progression patterns of nonmotor symptoms and assess their relationships with the clinical characteristics of Parkinson’s disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated the prevalence and onset time of motor and nonmotor symptoms in 78 non-demented patients with Parkinson’s disease with a disease duration of less than 10 years, all of whom completed questionnaires regarding the presence of these symptoms and the timing of their appearance. We performed a hierarchical cluster analysis based on onset age and the relative onset times of motor and nonmotor symptoms. We then compared clinical characteristics, and cortical morphological changes among the resulting subgroups. Cortical morphology was analyzed in a subset of patients with available brain imaging and was treated as a sub-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified three core clusters that exhibited different temporal patterns of symptom emergence in Parkinson’s disease. Cluster 1 was an older-onset group with early sleep problems, poor cognitive function. Cluster 2 was a younger-onset group with typical prodromal nonmotor symptom, mostly constipation. Cluster 3 was another older-onset group with poor cognitive function and many nonmotor symptoms present after the onset of motor symptoms. Structural brain imaging was available for most participants (58/78), and a subset of Cluster 1 showed more pronounced cortical atrophy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Temporal patterns of nonmotor symptom emergence are heterogeneous and are highly influenced by onset age. Older-onset patients showed a higher burden of nonmotor symptoms and worse cognitive function, with symptom emergence occurring either before or after motor symptom onset. Characterizing these symptom-emergence patterns may help refine the clinical classification of Parkinson’s disease and support more individualized evaluation and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100418
Ananda Carolina Moraes de Falcone , Carina França , Thiago Gonçalves Guimarães , Rubens Gisbert Cury
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has revolutionized Parkinson’s disease treatment, yet post-operative challenges persist, including reversible programming errors caused by insufficient clinician training. Approximately 40 % of suboptimal outcomes referred to tertiary centers stem from correctable programming errors, highlighting the need for standardized approaches [1]. This article addresses chronic overstimulation syndrome in Subthalamic DBS(STN-DBS), where patients with sustained high-energy stimulation leads poorly tolerated rebound effects when abruptly adjusted. We present a structured, image-guided algorithm combining gradual energy titration with advanced volume of tissue activated (VTA) modeling to optimize therapeutic windows. Three characteristic scenarios are detailed: (1) suboptimal lead placement, managed via directional steering to refine stimulation focus; (2) excessive stimulation energy, addressed through decremental total electrical energy delivered (TEED) reduction; and (3) misplaced leads, requiring systematic deactivation and candidacy assessment for surgical revision. Our tolerance-optimized framework emphasizes spatial precision (leveraging imaging reconstruction) and temporal adaptation (gradual parameter adjustments), offering a paradigm shift for managing chronic DBS complications. While focused on STN-DBS, these principles may extend to other targets facing analogous challenges. The integration of advanced imaging with clinician expertise underscores the dual importance of technology and specialized training in improving DBS outcomes.
{"title":"The electric brain: approach to suboptimal DBS parameters","authors":"Ananda Carolina Moraes de Falcone , Carina França , Thiago Gonçalves Guimarães , Rubens Gisbert Cury","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100418","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100418","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has revolutionized Parkinson’s disease treatment, yet post-operative challenges persist, including reversible programming errors caused by insufficient clinician training. Approximately 40 % of suboptimal outcomes referred to tertiary centers stem from correctable programming errors, highlighting the need for standardized approaches <span><span>[1]</span></span>. This article addresses chronic overstimulation syndrome in Subthalamic DBS(STN-DBS), where patients with sustained high-energy stimulation leads poorly tolerated rebound effects when abruptly adjusted. We present a structured, image-guided algorithm combining gradual energy titration with advanced volume of tissue activated (VTA) modeling to optimize therapeutic windows. Three characteristic scenarios are detailed: (1)<!--> <!-->suboptimal lead placement, managed via directional steering to refine stimulation focus; (2)<!--> <!-->excessive stimulation energy, addressed through decremental total electrical energy delivered (TEED) reduction; and (3)<!--> <!-->misplaced leads, requiring systematic deactivation and candidacy assessment for surgical revision. Our tolerance-optimized framework emphasizes spatial precision (leveraging imaging reconstruction) and temporal adaptation (gradual parameter adjustments), offering a paradigm shift for managing chronic DBS complications. While focused on STN-DBS, these principles may extend to other targets facing analogous challenges. The integration of advanced imaging with clinician expertise underscores the dual importance of technology and specialized training in improving DBS outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100424
Andrew McGarry , Scott Y.H. Kim , Peggy Auinger , Charles Venuto , John Gaughan
Participant self-report has become increasingly important in the design of clinical trials for Parkinson’s Disease (PD), resonating with the general sense that a person’s account of their experience should be a prime consideration in evaluating the effects of therapeutics. Typical study designs look to minimize the effects of comorbidities like substantial behavioral or cognitive disturbances that are expected to put accurate self-report at risk. However, little attention has been paid to the anticipated or actual ability of otherwise eligible PD study participants to accurately convey their experiences during participation. Metacognition, the ability to identify and reflect on one’s thought processes and output, would seem to be instrumental for the careful evaluation of therapeutics using self-report but is not directly assessed during screening for clinical studies. Evidence suggests metacognition may be impaired in participants expected to be enrolled, suggesting the assessment of metacognitive ability during screening or even study conduct may be a worthwhile evolution in study design. Future directions include modeling performance of participants with a range of metacognitive capabilities to understand its influence on outcomes in both active and placebo groups, and possibly simple tools or tests to assess study candidates at risk for poor metacognitive performance in trials that prioritize self-report.
{"title":"Explore thyself: is it time for metacognition screening in clinical trials?","authors":"Andrew McGarry , Scott Y.H. Kim , Peggy Auinger , Charles Venuto , John Gaughan","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100424","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100424","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Participant self-report has become increasingly important in the design of clinical trials for Parkinson’s Disease (PD), resonating with the general sense that a person’s account of their experience should be a prime consideration in evaluating the effects of therapeutics. Typical study designs look to minimize the effects of comorbidities like substantial behavioral or cognitive disturbances that are expected to put accurate self-report at risk. However, little attention has been paid to the anticipated or actual ability of otherwise eligible PD study participants to accurately convey their experiences during participation. Metacognition, the ability to identify and reflect on one’s thought processes and output, would seem to be instrumental for the careful evaluation of therapeutics using self-report but is not directly assessed during screening for clinical studies. Evidence suggests metacognition may be impaired in participants expected to be enrolled, suggesting the assessment of metacognitive ability during screening or even study conduct may be a worthwhile evolution in study design. Future directions include modeling performance of participants with a range of metacognitive capabilities to understand its influence on outcomes in both active and placebo groups, and possibly simple tools or tests to assess study candidates at risk for poor metacognitive performance in trials that prioritize self-report.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100421
Sen Wang , Yujie Che , Yiqun Lin, Yukang Zhang, Wen He , Wei Zhang
Background
Parkinson’s disease (PD), a common neurodegenerative disorder, severely affects patients’ quality of life. This study aims to update the assessment of PD’s prevalence, incidence, mortality, and disability–adjusted life years (DALYs) from 1990 to 2021. Analyses were conducted at Socio-demographic Index (SDI), global, regional, and national levels, stratified by gender and age.
Methods
PD data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database was extracted. Trends in age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR), age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR), age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), and age-standardized DALY rate (ASDR) of PD were assessed, and estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was calculated during the study period. Analyses were done by gender, age, GBD region, and SDI quintiles, using R statistical software for analyses and mapping.
Results
In 2021, the global burden of PD remained substantial. The number of prevalent PD cases grew from 3,148,394.56 in 1990 to 11,767,271.97 in 2021 (a 2.74-fold increase). Incident cases rose from 417,134.69 to 1,335,142.12 (a 2.20-fold increase). Males exhibited higher prevalence, incidence, and mortality rates than females across almost all age groups. High-SDI regions had higher ASPR, ASIR, and ASDR values than low-SDI regions. Countries and regions in Asia, particularly China and Japan, exhibited among the highest ASPR and ASIR globally. Projections indicate global ASPR and ASIR will continue to rise substantially over the next three decades (to 2050), with males exhibiting a faster rate of increase than females, while the ASMR is predicted to remain essentially stable.
Conclusion
This study systematically delineates the epidemiological landscape, temporal trends, and burden profiles of Parkinson’s disease across global, regional, gender-stratified, and age-specific populations, providing an evidence-based framework to guide precision prevention strategies and optimize healthcare resource prioritization.
{"title":"Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease – Global burden of disease research from 1990 to 2021 and future trend predictions","authors":"Sen Wang , Yujie Che , Yiqun Lin, Yukang Zhang, Wen He , Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100421","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100421","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parkinson’s disease (PD), a common neurodegenerative disorder, severely affects patients’ quality of life. This study aims to update the assessment of PD’s prevalence, incidence, mortality, and disability–adjusted life years (DALYs) from 1990 to 2021. Analyses were conducted at Socio-demographic Index (SDI), global, regional, and national levels, stratified by gender and age.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PD data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database was extracted. Trends in age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR), age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR), age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), and age-standardized DALY rate (ASDR) of PD were assessed, and estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was calculated during the study period. Analyses were done by gender, age, GBD region, and SDI quintiles, using R statistical software for analyses and mapping.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2021, the global burden of PD remained substantial. The number of prevalent PD cases grew from 3,148,394.56 in 1990 to 11,767,271.97 in 2021 (a 2.74-fold increase). Incident cases rose from 417,134.69 to 1,335,142.12 (a 2.20-fold increase). Males exhibited higher prevalence, incidence, and mortality rates than females across almost all age groups. High-SDI regions had higher ASPR, ASIR, and ASDR values than low-SDI regions. Countries and regions in Asia, particularly China and Japan, exhibited among the highest ASPR and ASIR globally. Projections indicate global ASPR and ASIR will continue to rise substantially over the next three decades (to 2050), with males exhibiting a faster rate of increase than females, while the ASMR is predicted to remain essentially stable.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study systematically delineates the epidemiological landscape, temporal trends, and burden profiles of Parkinson’s disease across global, regional, gender-stratified, and age-specific populations, providing an evidence-based framework to guide precision prevention strategies and optimize healthcare resource prioritization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145978294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100420
Guido Alves , Yvonne Stavland Sørenes , Veslemøy Hamre Frantzen , Michaela Dreetz Gjerstad , Anders Ledaal Bjørnestad , Jodi Maple-Grødem , Elin Bjelland Forsaa , Ylva Hivand Hiorth , Karen Herlofson , Espen Benjaminsen , Kari Anne Bjørnarå , Espen Dietrichs , Roberta Balestrino , Carmen Gasca-Salas , Chi-Ying R. Lin , Alvaro Sanchez-Ferro , Michelle H.S. Tosin , Tiago A. Mestre , Monica M. Kurtis , Pablo Martinez-Martin , Christopher G. Goetz
Introduction
The Movement Disorder Society-revised version of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the gold standard assessment for evaluating Parkinson’s disease (PD) symptoms and severity, but a validated Norwegian version is not yet available. We translated the original English MDS-UPDRS into Norwegian and tested the clinimetrics of the translated version following the MDS-established protocol for non-English language translations.
Methods
Two independent teams translated the English version of the MDS-UPDRS into Norwegian. After review of the back-translated English version, cognitive pretesting was performed in twelve PD patients at one study site. This was followed by large-scale testing completed by 351 native Norwegian-speaking PD patients at six centers across Norway. We applied confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses to determine the validity of the Norwegian version. Additional analyses were performed to test the reliability of the translated scale.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the factor structure of the Norwegian version was consistent with that of the English version, as indicated by comparative fit indexes of ≥0.90 for all four MDS-UPDRS parts. Exploratory factor analysis showed the same number of factors in each MDS-UPDRS part, compared to the English version, with some differences in item loadings. Cronbach’s α values were >0.70 for all four MDS-UPDRS parts.
Conclusion
The Norwegian language MDS-UPDRS has good construct validity and internal consistency, meeting the requirements to be designated as the Official Norwegian Version of the MDS-UPDRS. We recommend using this validated version in both research and clinical practice.
{"title":"Validation of the Norwegian version of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale","authors":"Guido Alves , Yvonne Stavland Sørenes , Veslemøy Hamre Frantzen , Michaela Dreetz Gjerstad , Anders Ledaal Bjørnestad , Jodi Maple-Grødem , Elin Bjelland Forsaa , Ylva Hivand Hiorth , Karen Herlofson , Espen Benjaminsen , Kari Anne Bjørnarå , Espen Dietrichs , Roberta Balestrino , Carmen Gasca-Salas , Chi-Ying R. Lin , Alvaro Sanchez-Ferro , Michelle H.S. Tosin , Tiago A. Mestre , Monica M. Kurtis , Pablo Martinez-Martin , Christopher G. Goetz","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100420","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100420","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Movement Disorder Society-revised version of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the gold standard assessment for evaluating Parkinson’s disease (PD) symptoms and severity, but a validated Norwegian version is not yet available. We translated the original English MDS-UPDRS into Norwegian and tested the clinimetrics of the translated version following the MDS-established protocol for non-English language translations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two independent teams translated the English version of the MDS-UPDRS into Norwegian. After review of the back-translated English version, cognitive pretesting was performed in twelve PD patients at one study site. This was followed by large-scale testing completed by 351 native Norwegian-speaking PD patients at six centers across Norway. We applied confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses to determine the validity of the Norwegian version. Additional analyses were performed to test the reliability of the translated scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the factor structure of the Norwegian version was consistent with that of the English version, as indicated by comparative fit indexes of ≥0.90 for all four MDS-UPDRS parts. Exploratory factor analysis showed the same number of factors in each MDS-UPDRS part, compared to the English version, with some differences in item loadings. Cronbach’s α values were >0.70 for all four MDS-UPDRS parts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Norwegian language MDS-UPDRS has good construct validity and internal consistency, meeting the requirements to be designated as the Official Norwegian Version of the MDS-UPDRS. We recommend using this validated version in both research and clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145927700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100425
Sagar Poudel , Deepa Dash , Aparna Wagle Shukla , Ajay Garg , Ashish Dutt Upadhyay , Naveet Wig , Roopa Rajan , Animesh Das , Divya MR , Manjari Tripathi , Achal K. Srivastava , SS Kale , Poodipedi Sarat Chandra , Ashish Suri , Pramod K Pal , Hrishikesh Kumar , Sakoon Saggu , Deepti Vibha , Rajesh Kumar Singh , Jasmine Parihar , Arunmozhimaran Elavarasi
Background
Normal Pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is treated by ventriculoperitoneal shunting. The cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF-TT) is widely used to identify candidates for shunt surgery in idiopathic NPH (iNPH). This study aimed to compare the CSF tap test responses and 24-week functional outcomes between patients with probable iNPH who underwent surgery and those who did not.
Methods
This Ambispective cohort study included 40 patients with probable iNPH, as defined by the 2019 Japanese guidelines, from 2019 to 2024. All patients underwent a large-volume CSF-TT, and they were offered surgery based on the clinico-radiologic profile.
Results
Twenty-four patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, and 16 did not for various reasons. No significant differences were found in the baseline or 24-hour post-CSF tap test parameters between the groups. However, at 24 weeks, 62.5% of the operated patients showed at least a 1-point improvement in mRS. In contrast, only 14.3% in the non-operated group did, indicating the beneficial role of VP shunting in NPH. Those who were operated had a 10 times higher odds (95% CI 1.6–105) of achieving at least one point improvement in mRS at 24 weeks. Interestingly, 46.7% of patients whose mRS did not improve after CSF-TT but who underwent surgery still benefited from shunting.
Conclusion
Shunt surgery leads to a favorable short-term functional outcome in patients with probable iNPH. However, the CSF-TT alone lacks sufficient discriminatory power to guide surgical decisions in a cohort of patients with clinico-radiological probable iNPH. A negative tap test should not preclude surgery in patients with supportive clinical and imaging features.
背景:常压脑积水(NPH)是通过脑室-腹膜分流术治疗的。脑脊液穿刺试验(CSF-TT)被广泛用于确定特发性NPH (iNPH)患者分流手术的候选人。本研究旨在比较可能的iNPH患者接受手术和未接受手术的患者的脑脊液抽头试验反应和24周功能结果。方法本双视角队列研究纳入了2019年至2024年日本指南定义的40例可能患有iNPH的患者。所有患者都接受了大容量CSF-TT,并根据临床放射学资料进行手术治疗。结果24例患者行脑室-腹膜分流术,16例因各种原因未行。各组间基线或24小时后脑脊液抽头试验参数无显著差异。然而,在24周时,62.5%的手术患者的mrs至少改善了1点,而非手术组只有14.3%的患者改善了mrs,这表明VP分流在NPH中的有益作用。接受手术的患者在24周时mRS改善至少1点的几率(95% CI 1.6-105)高出10倍。有趣的是,46.7%的患者在CSF-TT后mRS没有改善,但接受手术后仍然受益于分流术。结论分流手术对可能的iNPH患者具有良好的短期功能预后。然而,单独的CSF-TT缺乏足够的鉴别力来指导临床-放射学可能的iNPH患者队列的手术决策。有支持性临床和影像学特征的患者,穿刺试验阴性不应排除手术。
{"title":"CSF tap test parameters and Short-Term outcomes in operated and non-operated patients with idiopathic normal pressure Hydrocephalus: A cohort study","authors":"Sagar Poudel , Deepa Dash , Aparna Wagle Shukla , Ajay Garg , Ashish Dutt Upadhyay , Naveet Wig , Roopa Rajan , Animesh Das , Divya MR , Manjari Tripathi , Achal K. Srivastava , SS Kale , Poodipedi Sarat Chandra , Ashish Suri , Pramod K Pal , Hrishikesh Kumar , Sakoon Saggu , Deepti Vibha , Rajesh Kumar Singh , Jasmine Parihar , Arunmozhimaran Elavarasi","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100425","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100425","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Normal Pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is treated by ventriculoperitoneal shunting. The cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF-TT) is widely used to identify candidates for shunt surgery in idiopathic NPH (iNPH). This study aimed to compare the CSF tap test responses and 24-week functional outcomes between patients with probable iNPH who underwent surgery and those who did not.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This Ambispective cohort study included 40 patients with probable iNPH, as defined by the 2019 Japanese guidelines, from 2019 to 2024. All patients underwent a large-volume CSF-TT, and they were offered surgery based on the clinico-radiologic profile.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-four patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, and 16 did not for various reasons. No significant differences were found in the baseline or 24-hour post-CSF tap test parameters between the groups. However, at 24 weeks, 62.5% of the operated patients showed at least a 1-point improvement in mRS. In contrast, only 14.3% in the non-operated group did, indicating the beneficial role of VP shunting in NPH. Those who were operated had a 10 times higher odds (95% CI 1.6–105) of achieving at least one point improvement in mRS at 24 weeks. Interestingly, 46.7% of patients whose mRS did not improve after CSF-TT but who underwent surgery still benefited from shunting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Shunt surgery leads to a favorable short-term functional outcome in patients with probable iNPH. However, the CSF-TT alone lacks sufficient discriminatory power to guide surgical decisions in a cohort of patients with clinico-radiological probable iNPH. A negative tap test should not preclude surgery in patients with supportive clinical and imaging features.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}