Attitudes of Newly Hired Medicine Faculty Regarding Mentorship and Developmental Networks.

V Sood, W Wiggins, A Rodriguez, D Sigl
{"title":"Attitudes of Newly Hired Medicine Faculty Regarding Mentorship and Developmental Networks.","authors":"V Sood,&nbsp;W Wiggins,&nbsp;A Rodriguez,&nbsp;D Sigl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research shows that most Schools of Medicine faculty consider mentorship the most crucial factor in faculty development and retention. Many faculty are establishing developmental networks in lieu of hierarchical dyadic mentoring relationships. Clinicians are less likely than other newly hired faculty groups to seek mentorship despite having assigned mentors. The study's purpose was to determine the attitudes of newly hired faculty at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine (UNM SOM) regarding mentorship and developmental networks. Within their first year of hire, all newly hired faculty at UNM SOM are required to participate in a two-day orientation to the institution event called 'Quikstart.' During seven such events, new faculty [N=131] were surveyed anonymously on six single-response questions about their attitudes regarding mentorship and developmental networks, administered via online polls between September 2018 and July 2022. In this descriptive study, summary characteristics were analyzed. Newly hired faculty mentees reported that creating a developmental network was hampered by difficulties finding multiple mentors (55.3%), receiving conflicting advice from multiple mentors (22.4%), and gathering many mentors at the same location at the same time (11.8% ). Lack of clarity regarding faculty mentee needs (55.5%), mentors' unavailability (17.6%), and failure to find mentors (14.3%) were the most often mentioned difficulties during the initiation stage of mentorship (Hitchcock et al., 1995). Although the literature advocates moving from hierarchical dyadic mentoring relationships to developmental networks, this transition for Medicine faculty mentees will likely be hindered by a shortage of adequately trained mentors. Institutions need to identify and train mentors, incentivize and support mentorship, and encourage the creation and maintenance of self-selected development networks, possibly under the leadership of a transitional mentor.</p>","PeriodicalId":74984,"journal":{"name":"The chronicle of mentoring & coaching","volume":"6 Spec Iss 15","pages":"624-629"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880633/pdf/nihms-1859960.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The chronicle of mentoring & coaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research shows that most Schools of Medicine faculty consider mentorship the most crucial factor in faculty development and retention. Many faculty are establishing developmental networks in lieu of hierarchical dyadic mentoring relationships. Clinicians are less likely than other newly hired faculty groups to seek mentorship despite having assigned mentors. The study's purpose was to determine the attitudes of newly hired faculty at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine (UNM SOM) regarding mentorship and developmental networks. Within their first year of hire, all newly hired faculty at UNM SOM are required to participate in a two-day orientation to the institution event called 'Quikstart.' During seven such events, new faculty [N=131] were surveyed anonymously on six single-response questions about their attitudes regarding mentorship and developmental networks, administered via online polls between September 2018 and July 2022. In this descriptive study, summary characteristics were analyzed. Newly hired faculty mentees reported that creating a developmental network was hampered by difficulties finding multiple mentors (55.3%), receiving conflicting advice from multiple mentors (22.4%), and gathering many mentors at the same location at the same time (11.8% ). Lack of clarity regarding faculty mentee needs (55.5%), mentors' unavailability (17.6%), and failure to find mentors (14.3%) were the most often mentioned difficulties during the initiation stage of mentorship (Hitchcock et al., 1995). Although the literature advocates moving from hierarchical dyadic mentoring relationships to developmental networks, this transition for Medicine faculty mentees will likely be hindered by a shortage of adequately trained mentors. Institutions need to identify and train mentors, incentivize and support mentorship, and encourage the creation and maintenance of self-selected development networks, possibly under the leadership of a transitional mentor.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新聘医学教师对师徒关系和发展网络的态度。
先前的研究表明,大多数医学院的教师认为师徒关系是教师发展和保留的最关键因素。许多教员正在建立发展性网络,以取代等级分明的二元师徒关系。与其他新聘用的教师群体相比,临床医生不太可能寻求指导,尽管他们已经分配了导师。本研究的目的是确定新墨西哥大学医学院(UNM SOM)新聘教师对师友关系和发展网络的态度。所有新入职的新管理学院教师在入职的第一年都必须参加为期两天的“快速入门”(Quikstart)课程。在7次这样的活动中,新教师[N=131]在2018年9月至2022年7月期间通过在线民意调查接受了6个关于他们对指导和发展网络态度的单回答问题的匿名调查。在这个描述性研究中,我们分析了概要特征。新聘用的教师徒弟报告说,难以找到多个导师(55.3%),从多个导师那里得到相互矛盾的建议(22.4%),以及在同一地点同时聚集许多导师(11.8%),阻碍了建立一个发展网络。在师徒关系的启动阶段,最常被提及的困难是对师徒需求不明确(55.5%)、导师不存在(17.6%)和找不到导师(14.3%)。尽管文献主张从分层二元指导关系向发展网络转变,但对于医学学院的学员来说,这种转变可能会受到缺乏训练有素的导师的阻碍。各机构需要确定和培训导师,鼓励和支持导师,并鼓励建立和维持可能在过渡导师领导下自行选择的发展网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-Term Impact of Faculty Mentor Development on Mentees' Scholarly Productivity. Sustained Improvement of Faculty Mentoring Competency with a Mentor Development Program. Qualitative Descriptions of Developer Changes or Consistency Over Time. Reasons for Faculty Attrition, Assessed by Latent Class Analysis. Measuring Faculty Mentoring Competency: Establishing the Validity of a Short Form.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1