Sustained Improvement of Faculty Mentoring Competency with a Mentor Development Program.

A Sood, N Mickel, N Dominguez, B Tigges, O Myers
{"title":"Sustained Improvement of Faculty Mentoring Competency with a Mentor Development Program.","authors":"A Sood, N Mickel, N Dominguez, B Tigges, O Myers","doi":"10.62935/4p5cxu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The greatest challenge to forming faculty developmental networks is the limited availability of skilled mentors, emphasizing the need for mentor development programs. Limited data indicate that mentor development intervention improves mentors' self-reported mentoring competency over the short term. However, the impact on long-term mentoring competency is unknown, constituting a critical gap in the literature. The study used a randomized controlled design with multiple post-test measures to compare the effectiveness of a combined online asynchronous plus virtual synchronous mentor development program vs. an online asynchronous program alone. It tested the hypothesis that mentor development intervention results in greater and sustained improvement in self-assessed mentor competency than the control group in four Southwestern and Mountain West universities. Self-assessed mentor competency was examined using the MCA-21 Mentoring Competency Assessment scale at baseline, and 3-, 12- and 24-months. MCA-21 was rated on a seven-point Likert-type scale as 1, 'Not at all skilled' to 7, 'Extremely skilled'. The composite score was the 21-item average. Linear mixed models examined the intervention effect while accounting for repeated measures, with the main intervention effect operationalized by the intervention x period interaction. 47 intervention and 39 control faculty mentor-mentee dyads, mostly underrepresented in science, were recruited without pre-requirement for research competency. Compared to controls, MCA-21 for intervention mentors improved significantly from baseline at 3-months (Estimate (SE), 0.58 (0.19), 12 months (0.58 (0.21) and 24 months 0.74 (0.23), interaction p ≤0.005). By demonstrating sustained improvement in mentors' competency over 24 months, our findings provide the rationale for academic institutions to invest in faculty mentor development programs and will help the nation support the development of a skilled, diverse academic workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":74984,"journal":{"name":"The chronicle of mentoring & coaching","volume":"8 3","pages":"762-769"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The chronicle of mentoring & coaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62935/4p5cxu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The greatest challenge to forming faculty developmental networks is the limited availability of skilled mentors, emphasizing the need for mentor development programs. Limited data indicate that mentor development intervention improves mentors' self-reported mentoring competency over the short term. However, the impact on long-term mentoring competency is unknown, constituting a critical gap in the literature. The study used a randomized controlled design with multiple post-test measures to compare the effectiveness of a combined online asynchronous plus virtual synchronous mentor development program vs. an online asynchronous program alone. It tested the hypothesis that mentor development intervention results in greater and sustained improvement in self-assessed mentor competency than the control group in four Southwestern and Mountain West universities. Self-assessed mentor competency was examined using the MCA-21 Mentoring Competency Assessment scale at baseline, and 3-, 12- and 24-months. MCA-21 was rated on a seven-point Likert-type scale as 1, 'Not at all skilled' to 7, 'Extremely skilled'. The composite score was the 21-item average. Linear mixed models examined the intervention effect while accounting for repeated measures, with the main intervention effect operationalized by the intervention x period interaction. 47 intervention and 39 control faculty mentor-mentee dyads, mostly underrepresented in science, were recruited without pre-requirement for research competency. Compared to controls, MCA-21 for intervention mentors improved significantly from baseline at 3-months (Estimate (SE), 0.58 (0.19), 12 months (0.58 (0.21) and 24 months 0.74 (0.23), interaction p ≤0.005). By demonstrating sustained improvement in mentors' competency over 24 months, our findings provide the rationale for academic institutions to invest in faculty mentor development programs and will help the nation support the development of a skilled, diverse academic workforce.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过导师发展计划持续提高教师的指导能力。
形成教师发展网络的最大挑战是熟练导师的可用性有限,强调了对导师发展计划的需求。有限的数据表明,导师发展干预在短期内提高了导师自我报告的指导能力。然而,对长期师徒胜任力的影响是未知的,这在文献中构成了一个重要的空白。该研究采用随机对照设计,采用多种测试后测量来比较在线异步+虚拟同步导师发展计划与单独在线异步计划的有效性。本研究检验了西南四所大学和西山四所大学的导师发展干预在自我评估的导师胜任力方面比对照组有更大和持续的改善。在基线、第3个月、第12个月和第24个月采用MCA-21师徒胜任力评估量表对自评导师胜任力进行检验。MCA-21的李克特式评分为7分,从1分“完全不熟练”到7分“非常熟练”。综合得分是21项的平均值。线性混合模型在考虑重复措施的同时检验了干预效果,主要干预效果通过干预x周期的相互作用来实现。47名干预教师和39名控制教师的师徒二人组,大多在科学领域代表性不足,被招募时没有对研究能力的先决要求。与对照组相比,干预导师的MCA-21在3个月时较基线显著改善(估计(SE), 0.58(0.19), 12个月(0.58(0.21)和24个月(0.74),交互作用p≤0.005)。通过证明导师能力在24个月内的持续改善,我们的研究结果为学术机构投资教师导师发展计划提供了依据,并将帮助国家支持发展一支熟练的、多样化的学术队伍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-Term Impact of Faculty Mentor Development on Mentees' Scholarly Productivity. Sustained Improvement of Faculty Mentoring Competency with a Mentor Development Program. Qualitative Descriptions of Developer Changes or Consistency Over Time. Reasons for Faculty Attrition, Assessed by Latent Class Analysis. Measuring Faculty Mentoring Competency: Establishing the Validity of a Short Form.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1