Improving adult eating behaviours by manipulating time perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2023.2169320
Han Shi Jocelyn Chew, Jiayi Li, Samuel Chng
{"title":"Improving adult eating behaviours by manipulating time perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Han Shi Jocelyn Chew, Jiayi Li, Samuel Chng","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2169320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing body of research on improving health behaviours through future thinking but that in improving eating behaviour remains unclear. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of time perspective manipulation in improving adult eating behaviours. Articles published from inception through 17 March 2022 were retrieved from eight databases (CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane library, and Web of Science). Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models with effect sizes reported in Hedges' g. Sixteen experimental studies were included, representing 1,914 participants with mean ages ranging from 20.5 to 44.1 years old and mean baseline BMI of 22.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> to 37.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The interventions included were episodic future thinking (EFT; n = 12), message framing (n = 2), and varying inter-meal intervals (IMI; n = 2) in improving food choices, food intake and portion size. Two studies reported significant interventional effectiveness for domain-specific EFT while all studies on message framing and IMI reported significant interventional effectiveness. Message framing seemed to be more effective when both temporal distance and valence frames were manipulated. However, the pooled effect sizes of all the interventions did not result in a significant interventional effect (n = 5; <i>g</i> = -0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.44, 0.47; <i>p</i> = 0.23; I<sup>2</sup>=87.2%). More rigorous research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of manipulating time perspective in improving eating behaviours before such interventions are more widely used.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1485-1501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2169320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing body of research on improving health behaviours through future thinking but that in improving eating behaviour remains unclear. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of time perspective manipulation in improving adult eating behaviours. Articles published from inception through 17 March 2022 were retrieved from eight databases (CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane library, and Web of Science). Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models with effect sizes reported in Hedges' g. Sixteen experimental studies were included, representing 1,914 participants with mean ages ranging from 20.5 to 44.1 years old and mean baseline BMI of 22.0 kg/m2 to 37.2 kg/m2. The interventions included were episodic future thinking (EFT; n = 12), message framing (n = 2), and varying inter-meal intervals (IMI; n = 2) in improving food choices, food intake and portion size. Two studies reported significant interventional effectiveness for domain-specific EFT while all studies on message framing and IMI reported significant interventional effectiveness. Message framing seemed to be more effective when both temporal distance and valence frames were manipulated. However, the pooled effect sizes of all the interventions did not result in a significant interventional effect (n = 5; g = -0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.44, 0.47; p = 0.23; I2=87.2%). More rigorous research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of manipulating time perspective in improving eating behaviours before such interventions are more widely used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过操纵时间视角改善成人饮食行为:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
有关通过未来思维改善健康行为的研究越来越多,但有关改善饮食行为的研究仍不清楚。因此,我们对时间视角操作在改善成人饮食行为方面的有效性进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们从八个数据库(CINAHL、Embase、ProQuest、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus、The Cochrane library 和 Web of Science)中检索了从开始到 2022 年 3 月 17 日发表的文章。采用随机效应模型进行了 Meta 分析,效应大小以 Hedges'g 报告。共纳入 16 项实验研究,代表了 1914 名参与者,他们的平均年龄在 20.5 岁至 44.1 岁之间,平均基线体重指数为 22.0 kg/m2 至 37.2 kg/m2。干预措施包括偶发未来思维(EFT;n = 12)、信息框架(n = 2)和不同的进餐间隔(IMI;n = 2),以改善食物选择、食物摄入量和份量。有两项研究报告称,针对特定领域的 EFT 有明显的干预效果,而关于信息框架和 IMI 的所有研究都报告称有明显的干预效果。当对时间距离和价值框架进行操作时,信息框架似乎更有效。然而,所有干预措施的集合效应大小并未产生显著的干预效果(n = 5;g = -0.49;95% 置信区间 (CI) = -1.44, 0.47;p = 0.23;I2=87.2%)。在更广泛地使用此类干预措施之前,需要进行更严格的研究,以确定操纵时间视角对改善饮食行为的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of transition from adolescence to young adulthood in the context of chronic skin conditions: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Predicting adherence to COVID-19 behavioural guidelines: a comparison of Protection Motivation Theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. 'Welcome to my world': a thematic analysis of the lived experiences of people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis during the UK COVID-19 lockdown. 'It has been the hardest decision of my life': a mixed-methods study of pregnant women's COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy. Psychosocial and health stressors during the COVID-19 pandemic and their association with sleep quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1