Plastic Burning Impacts on Atmospheric Fine Particulate Matter at Urban and Rural Sites in the USA and Bangladesh

IF 6.7 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL ACS Environmental Au Pub Date : 2022-06-09 DOI:10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00054
Md. Robiul Islam, Josie Welker, Abdus Salam and Elizabeth A. Stone*, 
{"title":"Plastic Burning Impacts on Atmospheric Fine Particulate Matter at Urban and Rural Sites in the USA and Bangladesh","authors":"Md. Robiul Islam,&nbsp;Josie Welker,&nbsp;Abdus Salam and Elizabeth A. Stone*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >To better understand the impact of plastic burning on atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), we evaluated two methods for the quantification of 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene (TPB), a molecular tracer of plastic burning. Compared to traditional solvent-extraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) techniques, thermal-desorption (TD) GCMS provided higher throughput, lower limits of detection, more precise spike recoveries, a wider linear quantification range, and reduced solvent use. This method enabled quantification of TPB in fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) samples collected at rural and urban sites in the USA and Bangladesh. These analyses demonstrated a measurable impact of plastic burning at 5 of the 6 study locations, with the largest absolute and relative TPB concentrations occurring in Dhaka, Bangladesh, where plastic burning is expected to be a significant source of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Background-level contributions of plastic burning in the USA were estimated to be 0.004–0.03 μg m<sup>–3</sup> of PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass. Across the four sites in the USA, the lower estimate of plastic burning contributions to PM<sub>2.5</sub> ranged 0.04–0.8%, while the median estimate ranged 0.3–3% (save for Atlanta, Georgia, in the wintertime at 2–7%). The results demonstrate a consistent presence of plastic burning emissions in ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> across urban and rural sites in the USA, with a relatively small impact in comparison to other anthropogenic combustion sources in most cases. Much higher TPB concentrations were observed in Dhaka, with estimated plastic burning impacts on PM<sub>2.5</sub> ranging from a lower estimate of 0.3–1.8 μg m<sup>–3</sup> (0.6–2% of PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and the median estimate ranging 2–35 μg m<sup>–3</sup> (5–15% of PM<sub>2.5</sub>). The methodological advances and new measurements presented herein help to assess the air quality impacts of burning plastic more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":29801,"journal":{"name":"ACS Environmental Au","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502013/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Environmental Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

To better understand the impact of plastic burning on atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM2.5), we evaluated two methods for the quantification of 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene (TPB), a molecular tracer of plastic burning. Compared to traditional solvent-extraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) techniques, thermal-desorption (TD) GCMS provided higher throughput, lower limits of detection, more precise spike recoveries, a wider linear quantification range, and reduced solvent use. This method enabled quantification of TPB in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) samples collected at rural and urban sites in the USA and Bangladesh. These analyses demonstrated a measurable impact of plastic burning at 5 of the 6 study locations, with the largest absolute and relative TPB concentrations occurring in Dhaka, Bangladesh, where plastic burning is expected to be a significant source of PM2.5. Background-level contributions of plastic burning in the USA were estimated to be 0.004–0.03 μg m–3 of PM2.5 mass. Across the four sites in the USA, the lower estimate of plastic burning contributions to PM2.5 ranged 0.04–0.8%, while the median estimate ranged 0.3–3% (save for Atlanta, Georgia, in the wintertime at 2–7%). The results demonstrate a consistent presence of plastic burning emissions in ambient PM2.5 across urban and rural sites in the USA, with a relatively small impact in comparison to other anthropogenic combustion sources in most cases. Much higher TPB concentrations were observed in Dhaka, with estimated plastic burning impacts on PM2.5 ranging from a lower estimate of 0.3–1.8 μg m–3 (0.6–2% of PM2.5) and the median estimate ranging 2–35 μg m–3 (5–15% of PM2.5). The methodological advances and new measurements presented herein help to assess the air quality impacts of burning plastic more broadly.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塑料燃烧对美国和孟加拉国城乡大气细颗粒物的影响
为了更好地了解塑料燃烧对大气细颗粒物(PM2.5)的影响,我们评估了两种量化塑料燃烧分子示踪剂1,3,5-三苯基苯(TPB)的方法。与传统的溶剂萃取气相色谱质谱(GCMS)技术相比,热解吸(TD) GCMS具有更高的通量、更低的检测限、更精确的峰回收率、更宽的线性定量范围和更少的溶剂使用。该方法可以量化在美国和孟加拉国农村和城市收集的细颗粒物(PM2.5)样本中的TPB。这些分析表明,在6个研究地点中,有5个地点的塑料燃烧产生了可测量的影响,其中孟加拉国达卡的绝对和相对TPB浓度最高,那里的塑料燃烧预计将成为PM2.5的重要来源。据估计,美国塑料燃烧对背景水平的贡献为PM2.5质量的0.004-0.03 μg m-3。在美国的四个地点,塑料燃烧对PM2.5的贡献的最低估计范围为0.04-0.8%,而中位数估计范围为0.3-3%(除了佐治亚州亚特兰大,冬季为2-7%)。研究结果表明,在美国城市和农村地区,塑料燃烧排放在环境PM2.5中始终存在,在大多数情况下,与其他人为燃烧源相比,影响相对较小。达卡观察到更高的TPB浓度,估计塑料燃烧对PM2.5的影响范围从0.3-1.8 μg m-3 (PM2.5的0.6-2%)的较低估计值到2-35 μg m-3 (PM2.5的5-15%)。本文提出的方法进步和新的测量方法有助于更广泛地评估燃烧塑料对空气质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Environmental Au
ACS Environmental Au 环境科学-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS Environmental Au is an open access journal which publishes experimental research and theoretical results in all aspects of environmental science and technology both pure and applied. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome in the following areas:Alternative EnergyAnthropogenic Impacts on Atmosphere Soil or WaterBiogeochemical CyclingBiomass or Wastes as ResourcesContaminants in Aquatic and Terrestrial EnvironmentsEnvironmental Data ScienceEcotoxicology and Public HealthEnergy and ClimateEnvironmental Modeling Processes and Measurement Methods and TechnologiesEnvironmental Nanotechnology and BiotechnologyGreen ChemistryGreen Manufacturing and EngineeringRisk assessment Regulatory Frameworks and Life-Cycle AssessmentsTreatment and Resource Recovery and Waste Management
期刊最新文献
Solid-Phase Reactivity-Directed Extraction (SPREx): An Alternative Approach for Simultaneous Extraction, Identification, and Prioritization of Toxic Electrophiles Produced in Water Treatment Applications Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Recent Advances in Technologies for Phosphate Removal and Recovery: A Review Microbial Community Changes across Time and Space in a Constructed Wetland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1