Evaluation of Outcomes and Treatment Options Among Trauma Patients with Abdominal Vascular Injuries.

David Kurt, Chad Ammar, Elizabeth Ablah, Kelly Lightwine, Hayrettin Okut, Liuqiang Lu, James M Haan
{"title":"Evaluation of Outcomes and Treatment Options Among Trauma Patients with Abdominal Vascular Injuries.","authors":"David Kurt,&nbsp;Chad Ammar,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ablah,&nbsp;Kelly Lightwine,&nbsp;Hayrettin Okut,&nbsp;Liuqiang Lu,&nbsp;James M Haan","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol16.18711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Abdominal vascular injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include non-operative management, open repair, and endovascular procedures. This study aimed to characterize patients and detail treatment modalities among those who sustained a traumatic abdominal vascular injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A six-year descriptive retrospective study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and included all adult patients who sustained an abdominal vascular injury. Data abstracted included demographics, admitting characteristics, mechanism of injury, admitting vitals, injury details, diagnostic and treatment information, hospital course, and follow-up data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven patients were admitted with abdominal vascular injuries, however, 14 patients sustained injuries to smaller vascular branches and were excluded. Most vascular injuries involved the iliac artery (27.9%, n = 12), abdominal aorta (25.6%, n = 11), and inferior vena cava (25.6%, n = 11). Twenty-seven percent (n = 12) of patients sustained an injury to more than one vascular structure. Thirty-four percent of patients (n = 15) died before treatment of the abdominal vascular injury. Among the 28 patients (65.1%) treated for their vascular injuries, 46.4% (n = 13) were treated with open surgery, 32.1% (n = 9) were treated non-operatively, and 21.4% (n = 6) with coil embolization. Sixty-four percent of the patients (n = 18) who survived to discharge presented for follow-up care with a mean follow-up period of 3 ± 4.1 months. There were no vascular reinterventions after discharge for patients who followed up with our hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings suggested that appropriately selected cases of traumatic vascular injuries may be managed non-operatively and safely, as there were no mortalities, complications, or reinterventions among these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/5e/16-11.PMC9872503.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.18711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Abdominal vascular injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include non-operative management, open repair, and endovascular procedures. This study aimed to characterize patients and detail treatment modalities among those who sustained a traumatic abdominal vascular injury.

Methods: A six-year descriptive retrospective study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and included all adult patients who sustained an abdominal vascular injury. Data abstracted included demographics, admitting characteristics, mechanism of injury, admitting vitals, injury details, diagnostic and treatment information, hospital course, and follow-up data.

Results: Fifty-seven patients were admitted with abdominal vascular injuries, however, 14 patients sustained injuries to smaller vascular branches and were excluded. Most vascular injuries involved the iliac artery (27.9%, n = 12), abdominal aorta (25.6%, n = 11), and inferior vena cava (25.6%, n = 11). Twenty-seven percent (n = 12) of patients sustained an injury to more than one vascular structure. Thirty-four percent of patients (n = 15) died before treatment of the abdominal vascular injury. Among the 28 patients (65.1%) treated for their vascular injuries, 46.4% (n = 13) were treated with open surgery, 32.1% (n = 9) were treated non-operatively, and 21.4% (n = 6) with coil embolization. Sixty-four percent of the patients (n = 18) who survived to discharge presented for follow-up care with a mean follow-up period of 3 ± 4.1 months. There were no vascular reinterventions after discharge for patients who followed up with our hospital.

Conclusions: Study findings suggested that appropriately selected cases of traumatic vascular injuries may be managed non-operatively and safely, as there were no mortalities, complications, or reinterventions among these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹部血管损伤的创伤患者预后和治疗方案的评价。
简介:腹部血管损伤与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。治疗方案包括非手术治疗、开放修复和血管内手术。本研究的目的是表征患者和详细的治疗方式在那些谁持续创伤性腹部血管损伤。方法:在一级创伤中心进行了一项为期六年的描述性回顾性研究,包括所有持续腹部血管损伤的成年患者。数据包括人口统计学、入院特征、损伤机制、入院生命体征、损伤细节、诊疗信息、病程和随访资料。结果:57例患者因腹部血管损伤入院,14例患者因较小的血管分支损伤而被排除。大多数血管损伤累及髂动脉(27.9%,n = 12)、腹主动脉(25.6%,n = 11)和下腔静脉(25.6%,n = 11)。27% (n = 12)的患者不止一个血管结构受到损伤。34%的患者(n = 15)在腹部血管损伤治疗前死亡。28例(65.1%)血管损伤患者中,开放手术治疗占46.4% (n = 13),非手术治疗占32.1% (n = 9),线圈栓塞治疗占21.4% (n = 6)。存活至出院的患者中有64% (n = 18)接受了随访,平均随访时间为3±4.1个月。在我院随访的患者出院后无血管再干预。结论:研究结果表明,适当选择的外伤性血管损伤病例可以非手术治疗和安全,因为这些患者中没有死亡,并发症或再干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Extensive Cholangiocarcinoma Highlighting Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment Evaluating the Long-Term Neurologic Sequelae Among Trauma Patients who Received Flexion-Extension Radiographs Ethical Obligation of Adequate Pain Management in Long Term Care Residents with Dementia Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Robotic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer vs. Non-Cancer Patients A Case Report of Leclercia adecarboxylata Pyogenic Arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1