Paige Nichols, Adrienne Esposito, Maria Kolojeski, Jennifer Keomany, Hayrettin Okut, Jacqueline Morgan, Kevin Miller
{"title":"Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Robotic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer vs. Non-Cancer Patients","authors":"Paige Nichols, Adrienne Esposito, Maria Kolojeski, Jennifer Keomany, Hayrettin Okut, Jacqueline Morgan, Kevin Miller","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol17.21651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Vaginal cuff dehiscence (CD) after hysterectomy is a relatively uncommon but potentially serious complication of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy (RLTH), which is performed for benign and malignant indications. This study aimed to determine if there is a difference in the incidence and risk factors of CD following RLTH among patients with endometrial cancer compared to patients without endometrial cancer.\nMethods: This retrospective study included women 18 years or older who underwent RLTH performed by one of two surgeons from a single institution from 2013 through 2018. Patients who underwent conversion to laparotomy, chemotherapy and/or radiation within a year before or after RLTH, and with malignancies other than uterine cancer were excluded. Data were abstracted from patient medical records.\nResults: Of 950 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 50.7% (n=482) had endometrial cancer. CD was reported in 2.5% (n=24) of all patients. While controlling for other variables, obese patients were 25.1% less likely than non-obese patients to experience CD (p=.011). Additionally, CD was 2.8 times more likely to occur when surgery was performed by surgeon A compared to surgeon B (p=0.027). No other variables (cancer status, age, sexual activity after surgery, distance from home to location of surgery, time interval from surgery to loss to follow-up) predicted CD.\nConclusions: Endometrial cancer patients were not at greater risk of experiencing CD compared to non-cancer patients. Surgeon differences and BMI were associated with incidence of CD, and patients with a normal BMI were most likely to report experiencing CD.","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":"50 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol17.21651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Vaginal cuff dehiscence (CD) after hysterectomy is a relatively uncommon but potentially serious complication of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy (RLTH), which is performed for benign and malignant indications. This study aimed to determine if there is a difference in the incidence and risk factors of CD following RLTH among patients with endometrial cancer compared to patients without endometrial cancer.
Methods: This retrospective study included women 18 years or older who underwent RLTH performed by one of two surgeons from a single institution from 2013 through 2018. Patients who underwent conversion to laparotomy, chemotherapy and/or radiation within a year before or after RLTH, and with malignancies other than uterine cancer were excluded. Data were abstracted from patient medical records.
Results: Of 950 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 50.7% (n=482) had endometrial cancer. CD was reported in 2.5% (n=24) of all patients. While controlling for other variables, obese patients were 25.1% less likely than non-obese patients to experience CD (p=.011). Additionally, CD was 2.8 times more likely to occur when surgery was performed by surgeon A compared to surgeon B (p=0.027). No other variables (cancer status, age, sexual activity after surgery, distance from home to location of surgery, time interval from surgery to loss to follow-up) predicted CD.
Conclusions: Endometrial cancer patients were not at greater risk of experiencing CD compared to non-cancer patients. Surgeon differences and BMI were associated with incidence of CD, and patients with a normal BMI were most likely to report experiencing CD.
导言:子宫切除术后阴道袖带开裂(CD)是机器人辅助腹腔镜全子宫切除术(RLTH)的一种相对少见但潜在的严重并发症,RLTH适用于良性和恶性适应症。本研究旨在确定子宫内膜癌患者与非子宫内膜癌患者相比,RLTH术后CD的发生率和风险因素是否存在差异:这项回顾性研究纳入了2013年至2018年期间由一家机构的两名外科医生之一实施RLTH手术的18岁或18岁以上女性。排除了在RLTH前后一年内接受开腹手术、化疗和/或放疗的患者,以及患有子宫癌以外的恶性肿瘤的患者。数据摘自患者病历:在符合纳入标准的 950 名患者中,50.7%(n=482)患有子宫内膜癌。在所有患者中,2.5%(24 人)患有子宫内膜癌。在控制其他变量的情况下,肥胖患者发生子宫内膜癌的几率比非肥胖患者低 25.1%(p=.011)。此外,与外科医生 B 相比,由外科医生 A 进行手术的患者发生 CD 的几率是后者的 2.8 倍(p=0.027)。其他变量(癌症状况、年龄、手术后的性活动、从家中到手术地点的距离、从手术到失去随访的时间间隔)都不能预测CD的发生:与非癌症患者相比,子宫内膜癌患者发生子宫内膜异位症的风险并不大。外科医生的差异和体重指数与子宫内膜异位症的发生率有关,体重指数正常的患者最有可能出现子宫内膜异位症。