Gender Differences in Treatment Delays, Management and Mortality among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Cardiology Reviews Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1573403X18666220630120259
Tetiana Lunova, Roman Komorovsky, Ivan Klishch
{"title":"Gender Differences in Treatment Delays, Management and Mortality among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Tetiana Lunova, Roman Komorovsky, Ivan Klishch","doi":"10.2174/1573403X18666220630120259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of existing gender differences in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with respect to treatment delays, invasive management of ACS, and short and long-term mortality in patients with ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We defined 37 observational studies (OSs) and 21 randomized trials (RCTs) that best corresponded to our interests. OSs and RCTs were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with ACS more often experienced delays in treatment compared to men (OR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12-1.82) in RCTs. Female patients were less often treated invasively: RCTs (OR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.9), OSs: (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.68). Women had higher crude in-hospital mortality (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.53-1.59) and 30-day mortality (OR 1.71; 95% CI, 1.22-2.4) in OSs and (OR 2.74; 95% CI, 2.48-3.02) in RCTs. After adjustment for multiple covariates, gender difference was attenuated: in-hospital mortality (OR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.17-1.2), 30-day mortality (OR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24) in OSs. Unadjusted long-term mortality in women was higher than in men (OR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.31-1.52) in RCTs and (OR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5) in OSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with ACS experience a delay in time to treatment more often than men. They are also less likely to be treated invasively. Females have shown worse crude short-and long-term all-cause mortality compared to males. However, after adjustment for multiple covariates, a less significant gender difference has been observed. Considering the difference between crude and adjusted mortality, we deem it reasonable to conduct further investigations on gender-related influence of particular risk factors on the outcomes of ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10832,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201882/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X18666220630120259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of existing gender differences in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with respect to treatment delays, invasive management of ACS, and short and long-term mortality in patients with ACS.

Methods: We defined 37 observational studies (OSs) and 21 randomized trials (RCTs) that best corresponded to our interests. OSs and RCTs were analyzed separately.

Results: Women with ACS more often experienced delays in treatment compared to men (OR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12-1.82) in RCTs. Female patients were less often treated invasively: RCTs (OR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.9), OSs: (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.68). Women had higher crude in-hospital mortality (OR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.53-1.59) and 30-day mortality (OR 1.71; 95% CI, 1.22-2.4) in OSs and (OR 2.74; 95% CI, 2.48-3.02) in RCTs. After adjustment for multiple covariates, gender difference was attenuated: in-hospital mortality (OR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.17-1.2), 30-day mortality (OR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24) in OSs. Unadjusted long-term mortality in women was higher than in men (OR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.31-1.52) in RCTs and (OR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5) in OSs.

Conclusion: Women with ACS experience a delay in time to treatment more often than men. They are also less likely to be treated invasively. Females have shown worse crude short-and long-term all-cause mortality compared to males. However, after adjustment for multiple covariates, a less significant gender difference has been observed. Considering the difference between crude and adjusted mortality, we deem it reasonable to conduct further investigations on gender-related influence of particular risk factors on the outcomes of ACS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性冠状动脉综合征患者治疗延误、管理和死亡率的性别差异:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:我们旨在就急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的治疗延迟、ACS的侵入性管理以及短期和长期死亡率等方面,全面了解急性冠状动脉综合症(ACS)中现有的性别差异。方法:我们定义了37项观察性研究(OS)和21项随机试验(RCT),这些研究最符合我们的兴趣。分别分析OS和随机对照试验。结果:在随机对照试验中,患有ACS的女性比男性更容易出现治疗延迟(OR 1.43;95%CI,1.12-1.82)。女性患者较少接受侵入性治疗:随机对照试验(OR 0.87;95%CI,0.83-0.9),OS:(OR 0.66;95%CI,0.63-0.68)。女性在OS中的粗住院死亡率(OR 1.56;95%置信区间,1.53-1.59)和30天死亡率(OR 1.71;95%置信度,1.22-2.4)更高,在随机对照试验中(OR 2.74;95%可信区间,2.48-3.02)更高。在对多个协变量进行校正后,性别差异减弱:OS的住院死亡率(OR 1.19;95%CI,1.17-1.2)、30天死亡率(OR 1.18;95%可信区间,1.12-1.24)。在随机对照试验中,女性未经调整的长期死亡率高于男性(OR 1.41;95%可信区间,1.31-1.52),在OS中高于男性(OR1.4;95%置信区间,1.3-1.5)。结论:女性ACS患者比男性更容易延迟治疗。他们也不太可能接受侵入性治疗。与男性相比,女性表现出更糟糕的短期和长期全因死亡率。然而,在对多个协变量进行调整后,观察到了不太显著的性别差异。考虑到粗死亡率和调整后死亡率之间的差异,我们认为有必要进一步调查特定风险因素对ACS结果的性别相关影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Cardiology Reviews
Current Cardiology Reviews CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: Current Cardiology Reviews publishes frontier reviews of high quality on all the latest advances on the practical and clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. All relevant areas are covered by the journal including arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, drugs, methodology, pacing, and preventive cardiology. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Elevated Perspectives: Unraveling Cardiovascular Dynamics in High-Altitude Realms. Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: An Update on Emerging Pathological Mechanisms. Heart Rate Variability and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Literature. Comprehensive Review of Coronary Artery Anatomy Relevant to Cardiac Surgery. Unveiling the Complexities: Exploring Mechanisms of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1