Source recognition discriminability impairment in Huntington's versus Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from the CVLT-3.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-19 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2112682
Lisa V Graves, Emma G Churchill, McKenna E Williams, Emily J Van Etten, Mark W Bondi, David P Salmon, Jody Corey-Bloom, Dean C Delis, Paul E Gilbert
{"title":"Source recognition discriminability impairment in Huntington's versus Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from the CVLT-3.","authors":"Lisa V Graves, Emma G Churchill, McKenna E Williams, Emily J Van Etten, Mark W Bondi, David P Salmon, Jody Corey-Bloom, Dean C Delis, Paul E Gilbert","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2112682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests that individuals with Huntington's disease (HD) perform better than individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) Yes/No Recognition trial. However, those with HD have been shown to have deficits comparable to those with AD on the Source Recognition Discriminability (RD) index (which assesses the ability to distinguish between List A targets and List B distractors), suggesting that HD may involve selective impairment in aspects of yes/no recognition that rely on source memory. However, whether individuals with HD and AD show comparable deficits on Source RD across stages of dementia severity has not been adequately investigated. We examined performance on the CVLT-3 List A vs. List B RD index in individuals with HD or AD and mild or moderate dementia. Among individuals with mild dementia, scores were higher in the HD versus AD group, whereas among individuals with moderate dementia, scores were comparable between the HD and AD groups; this corresponded to differential performance across dementia stages among individuals with HD, but not AD. The present findings suggest that, relative to AD, HD may be associated with disproportionate decline in aspects of yes/no recognition that rely on source memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2112682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests that individuals with Huntington's disease (HD) perform better than individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) Yes/No Recognition trial. However, those with HD have been shown to have deficits comparable to those with AD on the Source Recognition Discriminability (RD) index (which assesses the ability to distinguish between List A targets and List B distractors), suggesting that HD may involve selective impairment in aspects of yes/no recognition that rely on source memory. However, whether individuals with HD and AD show comparable deficits on Source RD across stages of dementia severity has not been adequately investigated. We examined performance on the CVLT-3 List A vs. List B RD index in individuals with HD or AD and mild or moderate dementia. Among individuals with mild dementia, scores were higher in the HD versus AD group, whereas among individuals with moderate dementia, scores were comparable between the HD and AD groups; this corresponded to differential performance across dementia stages among individuals with HD, but not AD. The present findings suggest that, relative to AD, HD may be associated with disproportionate decline in aspects of yes/no recognition that rely on source memory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亨廷顿症与阿尔茨海默病的源识别辨别能力损伤:来自 CVLT-3 的证据。
研究表明,亨廷顿氏病(HD)患者在加利福尼亚言语学习测验(CVLT)是/否识别试验中的表现优于阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者。然而,HD 患者在 "源识别辨别能力"(RD)指数(评估区分列表 A 目标和列表 B 干扰物的能力)上的缺陷与 AD 患者相当,这表明 HD 可能涉及依赖于源记忆的是/否识别方面的选择性损伤。然而,对于HD和AD患者在不同痴呆严重程度阶段的源RD上是否表现出相似的缺陷,还没有进行充分的研究。我们研究了患有 HD 或 AD 以及轻度或中度痴呆症的患者在 CVLT-3 列表 A 与列表 B RD 指数上的表现。在轻度痴呆患者中,HD 组的得分高于 AD 组,而在中度痴呆患者中,HD 组和 AD 组的得分相当;这与 HD 患者在不同痴呆阶段的表现差异相对应,但与 AD 患者无关。本研究结果表明,相对于AD,HD可能与依赖源记忆的 "是/否 "识别能力的过度下降有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the assessment of functional capacity interview for older adults. Test of memory Malingering 2nd Edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain. Depressive symptoms in Brazilian Parkinson's disease patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A Cross-Sectional study. Goal attainment in individual and group-based neuropsychological interventions for young adults with dyslexia in a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive processing differences between stereotype activation and semantic activation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1