Risk stratification using the 2021 IDF-DAR risk calculator and fasting experience of Bangladeshi subjects with type 2 diabetes in Ramadan: The DAR-BAN study

IF 4.2 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcte.2023.100315
A.B.M. Kamrul-Hasan , Muhammad Shah Alam , Md. Ahamedul Kabir , Sumon Rahman Chowdhury , Muhammad Abdul Hannan , Emran Ur Rashid Chowdhury , Md. Mainul Ahsan , Choman Abdullah Mohana , Mohammad Hasan Iftekhar , Mohammad Jahid Hasan , Samir Kumar Talukder
{"title":"Risk stratification using the 2021 IDF-DAR risk calculator and fasting experience of Bangladeshi subjects with type 2 diabetes in Ramadan: The DAR-BAN study","authors":"A.B.M. Kamrul-Hasan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Shah Alam ,&nbsp;Md. Ahamedul Kabir ,&nbsp;Sumon Rahman Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Muhammad Abdul Hannan ,&nbsp;Emran Ur Rashid Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Md. Mainul Ahsan ,&nbsp;Choman Abdullah Mohana ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hasan Iftekhar ,&nbsp;Mohammad Jahid Hasan ,&nbsp;Samir Kumar Talukder","doi":"10.1016/j.jcte.2023.100315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To risk-stratify patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) according to the IDF-DAR 2021 guidelines and observe their responsiveness to risk-category-based recommendations and fasting experience.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective study, conducted in the <em>peri</em>-Ramadan period of 2022, evaluated adults with T2DM and categorized them using the IDF-DAR 2021 risk stratification tool. Recommendations for fasting according to the risk categories were made, their intention to fast was recorded, and follow-up data were collected within one month of the end of Ramadan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1328 participants (age 51.1 ± 11.9 years, female 61.1 %), only 29.6 % had pre-Ramadan HbA1c &lt; 7.5 %. According to the IDF-DAR risk category, the frequencies of participants in the low-risk (should be able to fast), moderate-risk (not to fast), and high-risk (should not fast) groups were 44.2 %, 45.7 %, and 10.1 %, respectively. Most (95.5 %) intended to fast, and 71 % fasted the full 30 days of Ramadan. The overall frequencies of hypoglycemia (3.5 %) and hyperglycemia (2.0 %) were low. Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia risks were 3.74-fold and 3.86-fold higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The new IDF-DAR risk scoring system seems conservative in the risk categorization of T2DM patients in terms of fasting complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100315"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/16/main.PMC9969239.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623723000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To risk-stratify patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) according to the IDF-DAR 2021 guidelines and observe their responsiveness to risk-category-based recommendations and fasting experience.

Methods

This prospective study, conducted in the peri-Ramadan period of 2022, evaluated adults with T2DM and categorized them using the IDF-DAR 2021 risk stratification tool. Recommendations for fasting according to the risk categories were made, their intention to fast was recorded, and follow-up data were collected within one month of the end of Ramadan.

Results

Among 1328 participants (age 51.1 ± 11.9 years, female 61.1 %), only 29.6 % had pre-Ramadan HbA1c < 7.5 %. According to the IDF-DAR risk category, the frequencies of participants in the low-risk (should be able to fast), moderate-risk (not to fast), and high-risk (should not fast) groups were 44.2 %, 45.7 %, and 10.1 %, respectively. Most (95.5 %) intended to fast, and 71 % fasted the full 30 days of Ramadan. The overall frequencies of hypoglycemia (3.5 %) and hyperglycemia (2.0 %) were low. Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia risks were 3.74-fold and 3.86-fold higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group.

Conclusion

The new IDF-DAR risk scoring system seems conservative in the risk categorization of T2DM patients in terms of fasting complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用2021年IDF-DAR风险计算器的风险分层和孟加拉国2型糖尿病受试者斋月期间的禁食经历:DAR-BAN研究
目的根据IDF-DAR 2021指南对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者进行风险分层,并观察他们对基于风险类别的建议和禁食经验的反应性。方法这项前瞻性研究在2022年斋月期间进行,评估了患有T2DM的成年人,并使用IDF-DAR 2021风险分层工具对他们进行了分类。结果1328名参与者(年龄51.1±11.9岁,女性61.1%)中,只有29.6%的人在斋月前HbA1c<;7.5%。根据IDF-DAR风险类别,低风险(应能禁食)、中风险(不禁食)和高风险(不应禁食)组的参与者频率分别为44.2%、45.7%和10.1%。大多数人(95.5%)打算禁食,71%的人在斋月的30天里禁食。低血糖(3.5%)和高血糖(2.0%)的总频率较低。高风险组的低血糖和高血糖风险分别是低风险组的3.74倍和3.86倍。结论新的IDF-DAR风险评分系统在T2DM患者禁食并发症的风险分类中似乎是保守的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Eating habits and carotenoid skin content among children based on their attendance at the school meals: A cross-sectional pilot study Glucagon-like peptide1 receptor agonist treatment of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes complicated by obesity: A cases series and literature review The bio-artificial pancreas to treat type 1 diabetes: Perspectives from healthcare professionals in the Netherlands Clinical characteristics of Ketosis Prone Diabetes: Evaluating diagnosis and management practices in a real-life setting Association between incretin-based drugs and risk of cholangiocarcinoma among patients with type 2 diabetes: A large population-based matched cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1