Can ACR TI-RADS predict the malignant risk of medullary thyroid cancer?

IF 4.2 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100380
Ying Zhang , Bei-Bei Ye , Han-Xiang Wang , Bo-Ji Liu , Yun-Yun Liu , Qing Wei , Chuan Qin , Yi-Feng Zhang
{"title":"Can ACR TI-RADS predict the malignant risk of medullary thyroid cancer?","authors":"Ying Zhang ,&nbsp;Bei-Bei Ye ,&nbsp;Han-Xiang Wang ,&nbsp;Bo-Ji Liu ,&nbsp;Yun-Yun Liu ,&nbsp;Qing Wei ,&nbsp;Chuan Qin ,&nbsp;Yi-Feng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance for medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) based on the 2017 Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System by the American College of Radiology (ACR TI-RADS) guideline, and the ability to recommend fine needle aspiration (FNA) for MTC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifty-six MTCs were included, and 168 benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) and 168 papillary thyroid nodules (PTCs) were matched according to age. Ultrasound (US) features were reviewed according to ACR TI-RADS. US, clinical features and diagnostic performance of cytology of MTC, BTN and PTC were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess independent variables to predict MTC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Multivariate logistic regression showed that position, hypoechoic, AP/T ratio ≥ 0.9 and marked internal blood flow were independent predictors of MTC compared to BTN (P &lt; 0.05) and nodule sizes, AP/T ratio &lt; 1, smooth or ill-defined margin and marked internal blood flow were independent predictors of MTC compared to PTC (P &lt; 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of MTC based on ACR TI-RADS was inferior to that of PTC (0.687 vs 0.823) (P &lt; 0.001). The recommended rate of FNA for MTC and PTC was 55.4 and 88.7 % respectively. 8 of 14 MTCs with negative FNA results (Bethesda II) had abnormal calcitonin (Ctn) results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on the ACR TI-RADS classification, the malignant risk features of MTC were intermediate between BTN and PTC. The diagnostic efficacy of MTC and FNA recommendation rate were inferior to PTC. Ctn examination would reduce the FNA missed diagnosis of MTC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100380"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214623724000516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance for medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) based on the 2017 Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System by the American College of Radiology (ACR TI-RADS) guideline, and the ability to recommend fine needle aspiration (FNA) for MTC.

Methods

Fifty-six MTCs were included, and 168 benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) and 168 papillary thyroid nodules (PTCs) were matched according to age. Ultrasound (US) features were reviewed according to ACR TI-RADS. US, clinical features and diagnostic performance of cytology of MTC, BTN and PTC were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess independent variables to predict MTC.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression showed that position, hypoechoic, AP/T ratio ≥ 0.9 and marked internal blood flow were independent predictors of MTC compared to BTN (P < 0.05) and nodule sizes, AP/T ratio < 1, smooth or ill-defined margin and marked internal blood flow were independent predictors of MTC compared to PTC (P < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of MTC based on ACR TI-RADS was inferior to that of PTC (0.687 vs 0.823) (P < 0.001). The recommended rate of FNA for MTC and PTC was 55.4 and 88.7 % respectively. 8 of 14 MTCs with negative FNA results (Bethesda II) had abnormal calcitonin (Ctn) results.

Conclusions

Based on the ACR TI-RADS classification, the malignant risk features of MTC were intermediate between BTN and PTC. The diagnostic efficacy of MTC and FNA recommendation rate were inferior to PTC. Ctn examination would reduce the FNA missed diagnosis of MTC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACR - TI-RADS能预测甲状腺髓样癌的恶性风险吗?
目的:本研究旨在评估2017年美国放射学会甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)指南对甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)的诊断效果,以及推荐细针穿刺(FNA)治疗MTC的能力。方法:56例MTCs,其中良性甲状腺结节(BTNs) 168例,乳头状甲状腺结节(ptc) 168例,按年龄进行匹配。根据ACR TI-RADS回顾超声(US)特征。比较MTC、BTN和PTC的临床特征和细胞学诊断效果。采用多变量logistic回归分析评估自变量以预测MTC。结果:多因素logistic回归分析显示,体位、低回声、AP/T比值≥0.9和明显的内血流是MTC与BTN的独立预测因素(P)。结论:基于ACR TI-RADS分级,MTC的恶性危险特征介于BTN和PTC之间。MTC的诊断效能和FNA推荐率均低于PTC。Ctn检查可减少FNA对MTC的漏诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT in guiding surgical management of primary aldosteronism Testicular function in postpubertal patients with growth hormone deficiency: A prospective controlled study Can ACR TI-RADS predict the malignant risk of medullary thyroid cancer? The association of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio with metabolic syndrome in U.S. Adults: Findings from the 1999–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination survey The effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy on myocardial, hepatic, pancreatic lipid content, body fat distribution and other cardiometabolic risk factors: A magnetic resonance-based study in transgender individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1