Interactions between typical antibiotics and Microcystis aeruginosa in aquatic environment

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Clean-soil Air Water Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1002/clen.202200298
Mengwei Li, Haidong Zhou, Mixuan Ye, Xinxuan Xu, Lidan Pang, Ziming Zhao, Yumei Xuan
{"title":"Interactions between typical antibiotics and Microcystis aeruginosa in aquatic environment","authors":"Mengwei Li,&nbsp;Haidong Zhou,&nbsp;Mixuan Ye,&nbsp;Xinxuan Xu,&nbsp;Lidan Pang,&nbsp;Ziming Zhao,&nbsp;Yumei Xuan","doi":"10.1002/clen.202200298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interactions of six typical antibiotics, including azithromycin, clarithromycin (CLR), ciprofloxacin, sulfathiazole, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline (TCY), with <i>Microcystis aeruginosa</i> were investigated, discussing the effects of antibiotics on algal growth in terms of mono- and co-antibiotics, and the removal of six antibiotics by the alga. The results showed that all the antibiotics showed “low-promoting and high-inhibiting” effects, except for sulfonamides, which showed a promotion trend on algal cell density and chlorophyll <i>a</i>. The tests of half effective concentrations (EC<sub>50</sub>s) of antibiotics against <i>M. aeruginosa</i> showed that the antibiotics of the same category had similar EC<sub>50</sub>s, and the toxicity effects of co-antibiotics were higher compared to mono-antibiotics. The toxic effects of antibiotics against <i>M. aeruginosa</i> were antagonistic in most binary co-antibiotics, and synergistic and simple additive effects in the ternary co-antibiotics. For removal tests of antibiotics by the alga, it could be seen that at the same concentration (10 µg L<sup>−1</sup>), <i>M. aeruginosa</i> showed the best removal of TCY with 22.8% and the lowest removal of CLR with only 5.8%. It was found that both antibiotics and <i>M. aeruginosa</i> had mutual influences; therefore, the interaction might be favorable to the permanent removal of antibiotics and reduce the impact on the aquatic ecological environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10306,"journal":{"name":"Clean-soil Air Water","volume":"51 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean-soil Air Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.202200298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interactions of six typical antibiotics, including azithromycin, clarithromycin (CLR), ciprofloxacin, sulfathiazole, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline (TCY), with Microcystis aeruginosa were investigated, discussing the effects of antibiotics on algal growth in terms of mono- and co-antibiotics, and the removal of six antibiotics by the alga. The results showed that all the antibiotics showed “low-promoting and high-inhibiting” effects, except for sulfonamides, which showed a promotion trend on algal cell density and chlorophyll a. The tests of half effective concentrations (EC50s) of antibiotics against M. aeruginosa showed that the antibiotics of the same category had similar EC50s, and the toxicity effects of co-antibiotics were higher compared to mono-antibiotics. The toxic effects of antibiotics against M. aeruginosa were antagonistic in most binary co-antibiotics, and synergistic and simple additive effects in the ternary co-antibiotics. For removal tests of antibiotics by the alga, it could be seen that at the same concentration (10 µg L−1), M. aeruginosa showed the best removal of TCY with 22.8% and the lowest removal of CLR with only 5.8%. It was found that both antibiotics and M. aeruginosa had mutual influences; therefore, the interaction might be favorable to the permanent removal of antibiotics and reduce the impact on the aquatic ecological environment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水生环境中典型抗生素与铜绿微囊藻的相互作用
研究了阿奇霉素、克拉霉素(CLR)、环丙沙星、磺胺噻唑、磺胺甲恶唑和四环素(TCY)等6种典型抗生素与铜绿微囊藻的相互作用,从单药和共药两方面探讨了抗生素对藻类生长的影响,以及藻类对6种抗生素的去除效果。结果表明,除磺胺类抗生素对藻细胞密度和叶绿素a有促进作用外,其余抗生素均表现出“低促高抑”的作用。抗生素对铜绿假单胞菌的半有效浓度(ec50)试验表明,同类别抗生素对铜绿假单胞菌的ec50相似,且联合抗生素的毒性作用高于单一抗生素。抗生素对铜绿假单胞菌的毒性作用在大多数二元共抗生素中表现为拮抗作用,在三元共抗生素中表现为增效和简单加性作用。对于该藻对抗生素的去除试验,可以看出,在相同浓度(10µg L−1)下,M. aeruginosa对TCY的去除率最高,为22.8%,对CLR的去除率最低,仅为5.8%。发现抗生素与铜绿假单胞菌相互影响;因此,这种相互作用可能有利于抗生素的永久去除,减少对水生生态环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clean-soil Air Water
Clean-soil Air Water 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: CLEAN covers all aspects of Sustainability and Environmental Safety. The journal focuses on organ/human--environment interactions giving interdisciplinary insights on a broad range of topics including air pollution, waste management, the water cycle, and environmental conservation. With a 2019 Journal Impact Factor of 1.603 (Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2020), the journal publishes an attractive mixture of peer-reviewed scientific reviews, research papers, and short communications. Papers dealing with environmental sustainability issues from such fields as agriculture, biological sciences, energy, food sciences, geography, geology, meteorology, nutrition, soil and water sciences, etc., are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information: Clean Soil Air Water. 11/2024 Effect of Intercropping Soybean on the Diversity of the Rhizosphere Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Communities in Wheat Field Short-Term Benefits of Tillage and Agronomic Biofortification for Soybean–Wheat Cropping in Central India Issue Information: Clean Soil Air Water. 10/2024 Geochemical Interaction and Bioavailability of Zinc in Soil Under Long-Term Integrated Nutrient Management in Pearl Millet–Wheat System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1