Distant Voices in the Dark: Understanding the Incongruent Information Needs of Fiction Authors and Readers

Carol Butler
{"title":"Distant Voices in the Dark: Understanding the Incongruent Information Needs of Fiction Authors and Readers","authors":"Carol Butler","doi":"10.1145/3176349.3176359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online tools enable authors and readers to share information, questions and feedback about a written work without the mediation of a publisher or agent. Little is known about how the two groups interact online around works of fiction, using either specialist social reading platforms e.g. GoodReads or Wattpad, or popular social media tools like Twitter. A better understanding of the interplay between them and the role technology plays as mediator can help inform the development of next-generation tools to suit their needs. We describe findings from interviews conducted with genre fiction authors and readers about how and why they interact and share information online. Interviews revealed that the social dynamics between the groups are complex, and that intercommunication can be both limited and somewhat unwanted. This shifted our focus from identifying how they interact to understanding why they do not. We found that communication patterns established by the traditional publishing industry create barriers between the groups, made visible, and exacerbated, by their retrofit to online social platforms where readers and authors are treated as equal. We discuss our key findings and highlight opportunities to better support the incongruent information needs of the groups.","PeriodicalId":198379,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Online tools enable authors and readers to share information, questions and feedback about a written work without the mediation of a publisher or agent. Little is known about how the two groups interact online around works of fiction, using either specialist social reading platforms e.g. GoodReads or Wattpad, or popular social media tools like Twitter. A better understanding of the interplay between them and the role technology plays as mediator can help inform the development of next-generation tools to suit their needs. We describe findings from interviews conducted with genre fiction authors and readers about how and why they interact and share information online. Interviews revealed that the social dynamics between the groups are complex, and that intercommunication can be both limited and somewhat unwanted. This shifted our focus from identifying how they interact to understanding why they do not. We found that communication patterns established by the traditional publishing industry create barriers between the groups, made visible, and exacerbated, by their retrofit to online social platforms where readers and authors are treated as equal. We discuss our key findings and highlight opportunities to better support the incongruent information needs of the groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑暗中遥远的声音:理解小说作者和读者不一致的信息需求
在线工具使作者和读者能够在没有出版商或代理的中介的情况下分享关于书面作品的信息、问题和反馈。至于这两个群体是如何在网上围绕小说进行互动的,他们是使用专业的社交阅读平台(如GoodReads或Wattpad),还是使用流行的社交媒体工具(如Twitter),我们知之甚少。更好地理解它们之间的相互作用以及技术作为中介所扮演的角色,有助于为开发下一代工具提供信息,以满足它们的需求。我们描述了对类型小说作者和读者的采访结果,内容是关于他们如何以及为什么在网上互动和分享信息。采访显示,群体之间的社会动态是复杂的,相互交流可能是有限的,有些是不必要的。这将我们的重点从确定它们如何相互作用转移到理解它们为什么不相互作用。我们发现,传统出版行业建立的交流模式在群体之间制造了障碍,通过对读者和作者平等对待的在线社交平台的改造,这种障碍变得明显,并加剧了。我们讨论了我们的主要发现,并强调了更好地支持群体不一致信息需求的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distant Voices in the Dark: Understanding the Incongruent Information Needs of Fiction Authors and Readers Visualizing and Exploring Scientific Literature with CiteSpace: An Introduction What Sources to Rely on:: Laypeople's Source Selection in Online Health Information Seeking Investigating Everyday Information Behavior of Using Ambient Displays: A Case of Indoor Air Quality Monitors Collaborative Information Seeking through Social Media Updates in Real-Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1