High Solidity, Low Tip-Speed Rotors for Reduced eVTOL Tonal Noise

F. Gandhi, Justin Pepe, Brendan Smith
{"title":"High Solidity, Low Tip-Speed Rotors for Reduced eVTOL Tonal Noise","authors":"F. Gandhi, Justin Pepe, Brendan Smith","doi":"10.4050/f-0078-2022-17440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper reports on a computational study conducted on an 8 ft diameter, fixed-pitch eVTOL rotor to examine the potential of using increased solidity and reduced tip speed to reduce the radiated acoustic signature. The study is conducted for the rotor operating in hover and in vertical climb, and at disk loadings between 6-12 lb/ft2. Relative to a \"nominal\" rotor of solidity σ=0.0646 (with N=2 blades and a root chord, c=15.82 cm), two 3σ rotors (the 3σ3 rotor with N=3 and root chord of 2c, and the 3σ5 rotor with N=5 and root chord of 1.2c) operating at reduced tip speed are considered, as is a single 5σ rotor (with N=5 and root chord of 2c) operating at a further reduced tip speed. The high solidity, low tip-speed rotors showed significant reductions in in-plane noise, both in hover as well as vertical climb, and over the range of disk loadings considered. The noise reductions observed with the 3σ5 rotor were significantly greater than those obtained by the 3σ3 rotor (operating at the same tip speed), and very similar to those of the 5σ rotor (operating at a lower tip speed). But the rotor torque and power penalty for the 3σ5 rotor was considerably lower than that for the 5σ rotor. Overall, a high solidity in the range of 0.2 for eVTOL rotors is quite advantageous, but further increase to around 0.3 appears acoustically unnecessary while being aerodynamically detrimental. At a solidity of 3σ, going from 3 wider chord blades to 5 narrower chord blades was hugely influential for in-plane noise reduction. Of the configurations studied, the best (the 3σ5 rotor) showed 16-24 dB reductions in in-plane noise in hover, reducing to 14.5-20 dB at 5/ms climb rate, and 12.5-16 dB at 10 m/s climb rate, with larger reductions seen at lower disk loadings. Relative to the solidity-σ rotor, the 3σ rotors had a torque penalty of 41-44%, and power penalties ranging from 1.5-5% in hover, increasing to 7.5-10% at 10 m/s climb rate. \n","PeriodicalId":223727,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 78th Annual Forum","volume":"2007 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 78th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0078-2022-17440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper reports on a computational study conducted on an 8 ft diameter, fixed-pitch eVTOL rotor to examine the potential of using increased solidity and reduced tip speed to reduce the radiated acoustic signature. The study is conducted for the rotor operating in hover and in vertical climb, and at disk loadings between 6-12 lb/ft2. Relative to a "nominal" rotor of solidity σ=0.0646 (with N=2 blades and a root chord, c=15.82 cm), two 3σ rotors (the 3σ3 rotor with N=3 and root chord of 2c, and the 3σ5 rotor with N=5 and root chord of 1.2c) operating at reduced tip speed are considered, as is a single 5σ rotor (with N=5 and root chord of 2c) operating at a further reduced tip speed. The high solidity, low tip-speed rotors showed significant reductions in in-plane noise, both in hover as well as vertical climb, and over the range of disk loadings considered. The noise reductions observed with the 3σ5 rotor were significantly greater than those obtained by the 3σ3 rotor (operating at the same tip speed), and very similar to those of the 5σ rotor (operating at a lower tip speed). But the rotor torque and power penalty for the 3σ5 rotor was considerably lower than that for the 5σ rotor. Overall, a high solidity in the range of 0.2 for eVTOL rotors is quite advantageous, but further increase to around 0.3 appears acoustically unnecessary while being aerodynamically detrimental. At a solidity of 3σ, going from 3 wider chord blades to 5 narrower chord blades was hugely influential for in-plane noise reduction. Of the configurations studied, the best (the 3σ5 rotor) showed 16-24 dB reductions in in-plane noise in hover, reducing to 14.5-20 dB at 5/ms climb rate, and 12.5-16 dB at 10 m/s climb rate, with larger reductions seen at lower disk loadings. Relative to the solidity-σ rotor, the 3σ rotors had a torque penalty of 41-44%, and power penalties ranging from 1.5-5% in hover, increasing to 7.5-10% at 10 m/s climb rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高硬度,低转速转子降低eVTOL音调噪声
本文报告了一项对直径8英尺、固定螺距eVTOL旋翼进行的计算研究,以研究使用增加固体度和降低叶尖速度来降低辐射声学特征的潜力。该研究是针对旋翼在悬停和垂直爬升中运行,并且在6-12 lb/ft2之间的磁盘负载进行的。相对于固体度σ=0.0646 (N=2个叶片和根弦,c=15.82 cm)的“标称”转子,考虑两个在降低叶尖速度下运行的3σ转子(N=3,根弦为2c的3σ3转子,N=5,根弦为1.2c的3σ5转子),以及在进一步降低叶尖速度下运行的单个5σ转子(N=5,根弦为2c)。高固体度、低叶尖速度的旋翼在悬停和垂直爬升以及在考虑的磁盘负载范围内都能显著降低平面内噪声。3σ5转子的降噪效果明显优于3σ3转子(相同叶尖转速),与5σ转子(较低叶尖转速)的降噪效果相当。但3σ5转子的转矩和功率损失明显低于5σ转子。总的来说,对于eVTOL旋翼来说,0.2范围内的高固体度是相当有利的,但进一步增加到0.3左右在声学上是不必要的,同时在空气动力学上是有害的。在固体度为3σ时,从3个较宽的弦叶到5个较窄的弦叶对面内降噪有很大的影响。在所研究的构型中,最佳构型(3σ5转子)在悬停时的面内噪声降低了16-24 dB,在5/ms爬升速率下降低到14.5-20 dB,在10 m/s爬升速率下降低到12.5-16 dB,在较低的磁盘负载下降低幅度更大。相对于固体度σ转子,3σ转子的扭矩损失为41 ~ 44%,悬停时功率损失为1.5 ~ 5%,爬升速度为10 m/s时功率损失为7.5 ~ 10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Solidity, Low Tip-Speed Rotors for Reduced eVTOL Tonal Noise Paint Scheme and Markings Digital Transformation On the Impact of Flight Control Systems on Kinetosis of Helicopter Passengers The Effect of Blade Tip Sweep Angle on Forward Flight Performance of a High-speed Helicopter Vitrimer Carbon Fiber Composites for Rotorcrafts Components with Fatigue Reverse Ability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1