Science and the Savage: the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 1874-1900

K. Anderson
{"title":"Science and the Savage: the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 1874-1900","authors":"K. Anderson","doi":"10.1177/147447409800500201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"or in darker imaginings, unevolved beasts has a long ancestry of critique in the human sciences. A tradition of psychologically based research into white attitudes in the settler societies of British empire has chronicled the diverse forms of prejudice against indigenous people, including those who, in moving to cities, were seen as detribalized misfits, dislocated from their natural habitats in the open spaces of country.’ More recently, concepts of ’the primitive’ have been critically deconstructed to reveal the discursive practices out of which social relations were configured in colonial societies.’ In that critique, the contribution made by various legitimizing agents to the racialized representation of indigenous peoples has been carefully documented, including that by scientists who, in their various ’mismeasures of man’ in the nineteenth century, left an indelible stamp on public beliefs.’ The diverse research efforts of, for example, craniologists, phrenologists, eugenicists and various other physical anthropologists who sought to calibrate ’man’s’ putatively finite forms of biological organization have been shown to authorize ideas of race difference and hierarchy that flourished under European colonial regimes. In the analysis of the constitution of racialized knowledges, much less attention, however, has been paid to those sciences which took, not ’man’, but rather ’nature’ as their primary object and field of investigation. The overwhelming focus of critical historiographies of race knowledge by the academy have been the disciplines of anthropology and geography, which inscribed otherness in the course of their own institutional development and alignment with the interest of empire.’ Yet in particular colonial settings, earth scientists, botanists, zoologists and variously aspiring naturalists played an equally vital role in fuelling nineteenth-century conceptions of difference that were in currency throughout European empires. Such scientists formed societies devoted to studying the colony, of which a natural history organization in New South Wales is this paper’s","PeriodicalId":199648,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","volume":"202 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409800500201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

or in darker imaginings, unevolved beasts has a long ancestry of critique in the human sciences. A tradition of psychologically based research into white attitudes in the settler societies of British empire has chronicled the diverse forms of prejudice against indigenous people, including those who, in moving to cities, were seen as detribalized misfits, dislocated from their natural habitats in the open spaces of country.’ More recently, concepts of ’the primitive’ have been critically deconstructed to reveal the discursive practices out of which social relations were configured in colonial societies.’ In that critique, the contribution made by various legitimizing agents to the racialized representation of indigenous peoples has been carefully documented, including that by scientists who, in their various ’mismeasures of man’ in the nineteenth century, left an indelible stamp on public beliefs.’ The diverse research efforts of, for example, craniologists, phrenologists, eugenicists and various other physical anthropologists who sought to calibrate ’man’s’ putatively finite forms of biological organization have been shown to authorize ideas of race difference and hierarchy that flourished under European colonial regimes. In the analysis of the constitution of racialized knowledges, much less attention, however, has been paid to those sciences which took, not ’man’, but rather ’nature’ as their primary object and field of investigation. The overwhelming focus of critical historiographies of race knowledge by the academy have been the disciplines of anthropology and geography, which inscribed otherness in the course of their own institutional development and alignment with the interest of empire.’ Yet in particular colonial settings, earth scientists, botanists, zoologists and variously aspiring naturalists played an equally vital role in fuelling nineteenth-century conceptions of difference that were in currency throughout European empires. Such scientists formed societies devoted to studying the colony, of which a natural history organization in New South Wales is this paper’s
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学与野蛮人:新南威尔士林奈学会,1874-1900
或者在更黑暗的想象中,未进化的野兽在人类科学中有着悠久的批判祖先。对大英帝国殖民社会中白人态度的基于心理学的研究传统,记录了对土著人的各种形式的偏见,包括那些移居城市的人,他们被视为非部族化的不合群者,从他们在乡村开阔空间的自然栖息地中流离失所。最近,“原始”的概念被批判性地解构,以揭示殖民社会中社会关系配置的话语实践。在这一批判中,各种合法化因素对土著民族种族化代表的贡献被仔细地记录了下来,包括那些在19世纪各种“对人的错误测量”中给公众信仰留下了不可磨灭印记的科学家。“例如,头盖骨学家、颅相学家、优生学家和其他各种身体人类学家的不同研究努力,试图对‘人’被认为是有限的生物组织形式进行调整,结果证明,种族差异和等级观念在欧洲殖民政权下盛行。”然而,在分析种族化知识的构成时,很少注意到那些不以“人”而是以“自然”作为其主要研究对象和领域的科学。学术界对种族知识的批判性历史编纂的压倒性焦点是人类学和地理学学科,它们在自己的制度发展过程中记录了差异性,并与帝国的利益保持一致。然而,在特定的殖民背景下,地球科学家、植物学家、动物学家和各种有抱负的博物学家在推动19世纪的差异概念方面发挥了同样重要的作用,这些差异概念在整个欧洲帝国中都是通用的。这些科学家成立了专门研究该殖民地的社团,其中新南威尔士州的一个自然历史组织就是本文的成员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Science and the Savage: the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 1874-1900 Book Reviews : Mapping men and empire: a geography of adventure. By Richard Phillips. London, Routledge. 1997. viii + 208 pp. £45.00, cloth; £14.99, paper. ISBN 0 415 13771 3, cloth; 0 415 13772 1, paper Book Reviews : Reading popular prints, 1790-1870. By B. E. Maidment. Manchester, Manchester University Press. 1996. 208 pp. £35.00, cloth. ISBN 0 7190 3370 5 Book Reviews : Liberation ecologies: environment, development and social movements. Edited by R. Peet and M. Watts. London, Routledge. 1996. xii + 273 pp. £45.00, cloth; £14.99, paper. ISBN 0 415 13361 0, cloth; 0 415 13362 9, paper Book Reviews : Indifferent boundaries: spatial concepts of human subjectivity. By K. M. Kirby. New York, Guilford Press. 1996. xiv + 170 pp. £16.99, paper. ISBN 0 89862 572 6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1