{"title":"Neighborhood Impact Assessment an urban sustainability instrument","authors":"E. Abreu, R. Peres","doi":"10.21625/essd.v7i2.935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Neighborhood Impact Assessment (NIA) [1]is an important instrument of the Brazilian Urban Policy enacted in the City Statute, Federal Law 10.257/2001. Considered by the national academic literature as a relevant instrument for local urban environmental management. However, in Brazil, the understanding that the environmental and the urban are part of the same context is not yet a reality within the local public administration sectors, with a deep disconnection of management and governance between the urban and environmental departments. The objective of this work was to analyze the application of NIA in medium-sized cities in the state of São Paulo and to evaluate its contribution to the local urban environmental management of these cities. We also intend to evaluate the NIA integration with other sectors of local public management such as the environment, urban mobility, social housing, etc. As a methodology, we used NIA Process Components, verifying the absence or presence in the urban laws of four (04) medium-sized cities in the state of São Paulo. We also interviewed civil servants from the environmental and urban sectors, supplementing information that was absent in laws and official documents. The results reveal that most municipalities do not have a specific law that regulates the NIA, and Master Plans, Land Use and Occupation Law regulate this instrument. Civil servants emphasize the weaknesses and strengths of the instruments. As potentialities of this instrument, they observed public participation, increased state control in environmentally sensitive areas, greater urban-environmental compensation mechanisms, and so on. Weaknesses signalize were: conflicts involving urban land subdivision, interference of the real estate market in the use and occupation of urban land, changes in the Master Plans by the city councilman aiming to meet the interests of private financial capital. The four cities, which are part of the Case Studies, have not yet effectively incorporated elements of climate change in their local governance. Issues related to social housing, expansion of slums, occupation of protected environmental areas by poor populations are still the most urgent priorities in these cities, as well as in many Latin American cities. The improvement and advancement of the articulation of the urban and environmental sectors in Brazilian cities must require thinking about better scientific methodological and governmental improvements. \n \n[1] Brazilian authors often use the terminology in English “Neighborhood Impact Study”. However, we chose to use “Neighborhood Impact Assessment” according to (Abiko & Barreiros, 2014) to facilitate the understanding of the instrument for the international audience, as it has similarities with the Impact Assessment. However, in Brazil, the NIA is known as the “Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança”.","PeriodicalId":178568,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science & Sustainable Development","volume":"83 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science & Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21625/essd.v7i2.935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Neighborhood Impact Assessment (NIA) [1]is an important instrument of the Brazilian Urban Policy enacted in the City Statute, Federal Law 10.257/2001. Considered by the national academic literature as a relevant instrument for local urban environmental management. However, in Brazil, the understanding that the environmental and the urban are part of the same context is not yet a reality within the local public administration sectors, with a deep disconnection of management and governance between the urban and environmental departments. The objective of this work was to analyze the application of NIA in medium-sized cities in the state of São Paulo and to evaluate its contribution to the local urban environmental management of these cities. We also intend to evaluate the NIA integration with other sectors of local public management such as the environment, urban mobility, social housing, etc. As a methodology, we used NIA Process Components, verifying the absence or presence in the urban laws of four (04) medium-sized cities in the state of São Paulo. We also interviewed civil servants from the environmental and urban sectors, supplementing information that was absent in laws and official documents. The results reveal that most municipalities do not have a specific law that regulates the NIA, and Master Plans, Land Use and Occupation Law regulate this instrument. Civil servants emphasize the weaknesses and strengths of the instruments. As potentialities of this instrument, they observed public participation, increased state control in environmentally sensitive areas, greater urban-environmental compensation mechanisms, and so on. Weaknesses signalize were: conflicts involving urban land subdivision, interference of the real estate market in the use and occupation of urban land, changes in the Master Plans by the city councilman aiming to meet the interests of private financial capital. The four cities, which are part of the Case Studies, have not yet effectively incorporated elements of climate change in their local governance. Issues related to social housing, expansion of slums, occupation of protected environmental areas by poor populations are still the most urgent priorities in these cities, as well as in many Latin American cities. The improvement and advancement of the articulation of the urban and environmental sectors in Brazilian cities must require thinking about better scientific methodological and governmental improvements.
[1] Brazilian authors often use the terminology in English “Neighborhood Impact Study”. However, we chose to use “Neighborhood Impact Assessment” according to (Abiko & Barreiros, 2014) to facilitate the understanding of the instrument for the international audience, as it has similarities with the Impact Assessment. However, in Brazil, the NIA is known as the “Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança”.
社区影响评估(NIA)[1]是巴西城市政策的重要工具,在城市法规(联邦法律10.257/2001)中颁布。被国家学术文献认为是地方城市环境管理的相关工具。然而,在巴西,地方公共行政部门还没有认识到环境和城市是同一背景的一部分,城市部门和环境部门之间的管理和施政严重脱节。这项工作的目的是分析NIA在圣保罗州中型城市的应用,并评估其对这些城市当地城市环境管理的贡献。我们还打算评估NIA与其他地方公共管理部门(如环境、城市交通、社会住房等)的整合情况。作为一种方法,我们使用NIA流程组件,验证了圣保罗州四个(04个)中型城市的城市法律中是否存在。我们还采访了来自环境和城市部门的公务员,补充了法律和官方文件中缺失的信息。结果表明,大多数市政当局没有具体的法律来规范NIA,总体规划、土地使用和占用法规范了这一工具。公务员强调这些工具的优缺点。作为这一工具的潜力,他们观察到公众参与、加强国家对环境敏感地区的控制、更大的城市-环境补偿机制等等。弱点信号是:涉及城市土地细分的冲突,房地产市场对城市土地使用和占用的干预,市议员为满足私人金融资本的利益而修改总体规划。作为案例研究的一部分,这四个城市尚未有效地将气候变化因素纳入其地方治理。与社会住房、贫民窟扩大、贫穷人口占领受保护的环境地区有关的问题仍然是这些城市以及许多拉丁美洲城市最紧迫的优先事项。要改善和促进巴西城市中城市和环境部门的联系,就必须考虑更好的科学方法和政府改进。巴西作家经常使用英语术语“Neighborhood Impact Study”。然而,根据(Abiko & Barreiros, 2014),我们选择使用“邻里影响评估”,以促进国际观众对该工具的理解,因为它与影响评估有相似之处。然而,在巴西,NIA被称为“Estudo de Impacto de vizinhana”。