Empirical Assessment of the Quality of Nationalities: The Quality of Nationality Index (QNI)

D. Kochenov, J. Lindeboom
{"title":"Empirical Assessment of the Quality of Nationalities: The Quality of Nationality Index (QNI)","authors":"D. Kochenov, J. Lindeboom","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00404007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary thinking about nationality is surrounded by three persistent mythologies. First, all nationalities are equal. Second, there is a direct correlation between the power and size of the economy of a country and the quality of its nationality. Third, there is a correlation between the geographical scope of the rights granted by a nationality and the territory of the conferring state. Looking beyond the subjective feelings one may have towards one’s nationality, the widely diverging quality of nationalities can in fact be measured. In the Quality of Nationality Index, which this article introduces and discusses, an attempt has been made to develop and deploy a reliable and straightforward methodology to measure objectively the value of having a particular nationality, which would not be perception-based. Nationalities are not equal, at least not under the assumption that the level of expected welfare, education, healthcare, life chances, and global travel and settlement opportunities matter.","PeriodicalId":236019,"journal":{"name":"University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"18 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Groningen Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00404007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Contemporary thinking about nationality is surrounded by three persistent mythologies. First, all nationalities are equal. Second, there is a direct correlation between the power and size of the economy of a country and the quality of its nationality. Third, there is a correlation between the geographical scope of the rights granted by a nationality and the territory of the conferring state. Looking beyond the subjective feelings one may have towards one’s nationality, the widely diverging quality of nationalities can in fact be measured. In the Quality of Nationality Index, which this article introduces and discusses, an attempt has been made to develop and deploy a reliable and straightforward methodology to measure objectively the value of having a particular nationality, which would not be perception-based. Nationalities are not equal, at least not under the assumption that the level of expected welfare, education, healthcare, life chances, and global travel and settlement opportunities matter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族素质的实证评价:民族素质指数(QNI)
当代关于民族性的思考被三个持久的神话所包围。第一,各民族一律平等。其次,一个国家的经济实力和规模与其民族素质之间存在直接关联。第三,国籍所授予权利的地理范围与授予国的领土之间存在相关性。超越一个人对自己国籍的主观感受,实际上可以衡量不同国籍的不同品质。在本文介绍和讨论的国籍质量指数中,已经尝试开发和部署一种可靠而直接的方法来客观地衡量拥有特定国籍的价值,而不是基于感知。国籍是不平等的,至少在预期福利水平、教育、医疗保健、生活机会、全球旅行和定居机会重要的假设下是不平等的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choosing Your Battles: Endogenous Multihoming and Platform Competition Landjepik in Nederland: Een verkennend empirisch onderzoek naar het gebruik zonder recht van gemeentegrond (Illegal Land Use in the Netherlands: An Explorative Empirical Study on the Use of Municipal Land Without Any Right) Empirical Assessment of the Quality of Nationalities: The Quality of Nationality Index (QNI) Principles-Based Regulation and Public Trust in the Post-Crisis World: The Dutch Case of Financial Services Avoiding Terminological Confusion Between the Notions of ‘Biometrics’ and ‘Biometric Data’: An Investigation Into the Meanings of the Terms From a European Data Protection and a Scientific Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1