A New Era in Cross-strait Relations? A Post-sovereign Enquiry in Taiwan’s Investment Treaty System

Horia Ciurtin
{"title":"A New Era in Cross-strait Relations? A Post-sovereign Enquiry in Taiwan’s Investment Treaty System","authors":"Horia Ciurtin","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198827450.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author provides a post-sovereign enquiry in Taiwan’s investment treaty system. Going beyond the traditional legal divisions, Taiwan showed that it can bypass such limitations, being a main trend-setter in innovating the area of international economic law. Specifically, a close look at Taiwan’s nexus of investment treaty is eye-opening; Taiwan concluded twenty-nine BITs and six ample economic cooperation agreements with related investment provisions. The number and the importance of these agreements reveal that the concept of international recognition does not directly influence the behaviour of states which are willing to interact legally and economically. In this regard, non-diplomatic relations might be used as a step forward, as Taiwan is closer to conclude an agreement with another post-sovereign entity, the European Union. This global actor may open up the scene for a multi-tier dynamic where some of its component member states are in principle against any liaison with Taiwan, but will be bound to it because of their membership to the EU. To solve such legal contradiction, the established instruments of international law cannot be applied, and a new theoretical framework shall be developed. To this end, the starting point must be to discuss sovereignty thoroughly. The chapter assesses the polity’s effort for the development of diplomatic structures by means of investment agreements, in this way avoiding the problems related to recognition. This kind of agreement can be considered as a litmus test, showing Taiwan’s capacity to shift traditional categories of Westphalian international law and emerge as a self-standing actor.","PeriodicalId":112957,"journal":{"name":"China's International Investment Strategy","volume":"27 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China's International Investment Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198827450.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The author provides a post-sovereign enquiry in Taiwan’s investment treaty system. Going beyond the traditional legal divisions, Taiwan showed that it can bypass such limitations, being a main trend-setter in innovating the area of international economic law. Specifically, a close look at Taiwan’s nexus of investment treaty is eye-opening; Taiwan concluded twenty-nine BITs and six ample economic cooperation agreements with related investment provisions. The number and the importance of these agreements reveal that the concept of international recognition does not directly influence the behaviour of states which are willing to interact legally and economically. In this regard, non-diplomatic relations might be used as a step forward, as Taiwan is closer to conclude an agreement with another post-sovereign entity, the European Union. This global actor may open up the scene for a multi-tier dynamic where some of its component member states are in principle against any liaison with Taiwan, but will be bound to it because of their membership to the EU. To solve such legal contradiction, the established instruments of international law cannot be applied, and a new theoretical framework shall be developed. To this end, the starting point must be to discuss sovereignty thoroughly. The chapter assesses the polity’s effort for the development of diplomatic structures by means of investment agreements, in this way avoiding the problems related to recognition. This kind of agreement can be considered as a litmus test, showing Taiwan’s capacity to shift traditional categories of Westphalian international law and emerge as a self-standing actor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两岸关系进入新时代?台湾投资条约制度的后主权探究
笔者对台湾投资条约制度进行了后主权时代的探讨。台湾超越了传统的法律划分,证明了它可以绕过这些限制,成为国际经济法领域创新的主要引领者。具体来说,仔细研究台湾的投资协定会让人大开眼界;台湾共签订了29项双边投资协定和6项内容丰富的经济合作协定,并有相关投资条款。这些协定的数量和重要性表明,国际承认的概念并不直接影响愿意在法律和经济上相互交往的国家的行为。在这方面,非外交关系可能被用作向前迈出的一步,因为台湾更接近于与另一个后主权实体欧盟达成协议。这一全球角色可能会为多层动态打开舞台,其中一些组成成员国原则上反对与台湾有任何联系,但由于它们是欧盟成员国,它们将受到台湾的约束。要解决这一法律矛盾,现有的国际法文书不能适用,必须发展新的理论框架。为此,起点必须是彻底讨论主权问题。本章评估了该政体通过投资协定发展外交结构的努力,从而避免了与承认有关的问题。这种协议可以被视为一个试金石,表明台湾有能力改变威斯特伐利亚国际法的传统类别,成为一个独立的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Era in Cross-strait Relations? A Post-sovereign Enquiry in Taiwan’s Investment Treaty System The RCEP Investment Rules and China The Political Economy of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment in ‘One-Belt, One-Road (OBOR)’ Countries Chinese SOE Investments and the National Security Protection under IIAs Substantive Provisions of the East Asian Trilateral Investment Agreement and their Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1