Imbalanced Data Sparsity as a Source of Unfair Bias in Collaborative Filtering

Aditya Joshi, Chin Lin Wong, Diego Marinho de Oliveira, Farhad Zafari, Fernando Mourão, Sabir Ribas, Saumya Pandey
{"title":"Imbalanced Data Sparsity as a Source of Unfair Bias in Collaborative Filtering","authors":"Aditya Joshi, Chin Lin Wong, Diego Marinho de Oliveira, Farhad Zafari, Fernando Mourão, Sabir Ribas, Saumya Pandey","doi":"10.1145/3523227.3547404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative Filtering (CF) is a class of methods widely used to support high-quality Recommender Systems (RSs) across several industries [6]. Studies have uncovered distinct advantages and limitations of CF in many real-world applications [5, 9]. Besides the inability to address the cold-start problem, sensitivity to data sparsity is among the main limitations recurrently associated with this class of RSs. Past work has extensively demonstrated that data sparsity critically impacts CF accuracy [2, 3, 4]. The proposed talk revisits the relation between data sparsity and CF from a new perspective, evincing that the former also impacts the fairness of recommendations. In particular, data sparsity might lead to unfair bias in domains where the volume of activity strongly correlates with personal characteristics that are protected by law (i.e., protected attributes). This concern is critical for RSs deployed in domains such as the recruitment domain, where RSs have been reported to automate or facilitate discriminatory behaviour [7]. Our work at SEEK deals with recommender algorithms that recommend jobs to candidates via SEEK’s multiple channels. While this talk focuses on our perspective of the problem in the job recommendation domain, the discussion is relevant to many other domains where recommenders potentially have a social or economic impact on the lives of individuals and groups.","PeriodicalId":443279,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3523227.3547404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative Filtering (CF) is a class of methods widely used to support high-quality Recommender Systems (RSs) across several industries [6]. Studies have uncovered distinct advantages and limitations of CF in many real-world applications [5, 9]. Besides the inability to address the cold-start problem, sensitivity to data sparsity is among the main limitations recurrently associated with this class of RSs. Past work has extensively demonstrated that data sparsity critically impacts CF accuracy [2, 3, 4]. The proposed talk revisits the relation between data sparsity and CF from a new perspective, evincing that the former also impacts the fairness of recommendations. In particular, data sparsity might lead to unfair bias in domains where the volume of activity strongly correlates with personal characteristics that are protected by law (i.e., protected attributes). This concern is critical for RSs deployed in domains such as the recruitment domain, where RSs have been reported to automate or facilitate discriminatory behaviour [7]. Our work at SEEK deals with recommender algorithms that recommend jobs to candidates via SEEK’s multiple channels. While this talk focuses on our perspective of the problem in the job recommendation domain, the discussion is relevant to many other domains where recommenders potentially have a social or economic impact on the lives of individuals and groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协同过滤中不公平偏差的来源——不平衡数据稀疏性
协同过滤(CF)是一类广泛用于支持跨多个行业的高质量推荐系统(RSs)的方法。研究已经揭示了CF在许多实际应用中的明显优势和局限性[5,9]。除了无法解决冷启动问题之外,对数据稀疏性的敏感性也是这类RSs的主要限制之一。过去的工作已经广泛地证明了数据稀疏性对CF精度的影响[2,3,4]。本次演讲从一个新的角度重新审视了数据稀疏度和CF之间的关系,证明前者也会影响推荐的公平性。特别是,在活动量与受法律保护的个人特征(即受保护的属性)密切相关的领域,数据稀疏性可能导致不公平的偏见。这种担忧对于在招聘等领域部署RSs至关重要,据报道,在招聘领域,RSs会自动化或促进歧视行为bbb。我们在SEEK的工作涉及通过SEEK的多个渠道向候选人推荐工作的推荐算法。虽然这次演讲的重点是我们对工作推荐领域问题的看法,但讨论与许多其他领域相关,其中推荐者可能对个人和群体的生活产生社会或经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning for multi-target Cross-Domain Recommendation Imbalanced Data Sparsity as a Source of Unfair Bias in Collaborative Filtering Position Awareness Modeling with Knowledge Distillation for CTR Prediction Multi-Modal Dialog State Tracking for Interactive Fashion Recommendation Denoising Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1