A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity

David Z Liao, V. Mehta, E. Du, V. Tabatabaie, I. M. Levy, Richard V. Smith, Marc J. Gibber
{"title":"A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity","authors":"David Z Liao, V. Mehta, E. Du, V. Tabatabaie, I. M. Levy, Richard V. Smith, Marc J. Gibber","doi":"10.1102/2051-7726.2020.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are currently no formally validated training phantoms for teaching ultrasound-guided thyroid fineneedle aspiration (FNA). We designed and established face and construct validity of a low-cost phantom for ultrasoundguided thyroid fine-needle aspiration. Methods: We designed an affordable, gelatin-based thyroid FNA phantom. Participants included 9 medical students, 7 novice residents/fellows (55 thyroid FNAs), and 7 expert residents/fellows (55 thyroid FNAs). Participants performed 6 trials of thyroid FNA, which were scored on completion time, accuracy, and errors. Participants also completed questionnaires to assess the benefit and realism of the simulation. Results: Simulation scores at trial 1 significantly discriminated expert participants from novice participants (P = 0.028) and from medical students (P 5 0.001). Median novice resident/fellow participant scores increased with repeated trials and were no longer significantly different from expert scores by trial 2. The scores for this group were significantly better compared with medical student scores by trial 4. Between trial 1 and trial 6, significant score improvements were observed in both medical students (P = 0.018) and novice residents (P = 0.018). All participants found the phantom to be beneficial in learning thyroid FNA. Both attending endocrinologists and 6 of 7 expert participants found the ultrasound visualization of the phantom to be realistic. One of two attending endocrinologists and 5 of 7 expert participants found the haptic feedback to be realistic. Conclusion: We designed a low-cost thyroid FNA phantom that demonstrates face and construct validity. This phantom can be used to train procedural skills in a residency program and can also be used to evaluate skill acquisition.","PeriodicalId":202461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","volume":"1 9-10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2020.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are currently no formally validated training phantoms for teaching ultrasound-guided thyroid fineneedle aspiration (FNA). We designed and established face and construct validity of a low-cost phantom for ultrasoundguided thyroid fine-needle aspiration. Methods: We designed an affordable, gelatin-based thyroid FNA phantom. Participants included 9 medical students, 7 novice residents/fellows (55 thyroid FNAs), and 7 expert residents/fellows (55 thyroid FNAs). Participants performed 6 trials of thyroid FNA, which were scored on completion time, accuracy, and errors. Participants also completed questionnaires to assess the benefit and realism of the simulation. Results: Simulation scores at trial 1 significantly discriminated expert participants from novice participants (P = 0.028) and from medical students (P 5 0.001). Median novice resident/fellow participant scores increased with repeated trials and were no longer significantly different from expert scores by trial 2. The scores for this group were significantly better compared with medical student scores by trial 4. Between trial 1 and trial 6, significant score improvements were observed in both medical students (P = 0.018) and novice residents (P = 0.018). All participants found the phantom to be beneficial in learning thyroid FNA. Both attending endocrinologists and 6 of 7 expert participants found the ultrasound visualization of the phantom to be realistic. One of two attending endocrinologists and 5 of 7 expert participants found the haptic feedback to be realistic. Conclusion: We designed a low-cost thyroid FNA phantom that demonstrates face and construct validity. This phantom can be used to train procedural skills in a residency program and can also be used to evaluate skill acquisition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导甲状腺细针抽吸训练的低成本假体:外观和结构效度
背景:目前尚无正式验证的超声引导甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)教学训练模型。我们设计并建立了一种低成本的超声引导甲状腺细针穿刺假体,并构建了其有效性。方法:我们设计了一种价格合理的明胶基甲状腺FNA假体。参与者包括9名医学生、7名新手住院医师/研究员(55名甲状腺FNAs)和7名专家住院医师/研究员(55名甲状腺FNAs)。参与者进行了6次甲状腺FNA试验,并对完成时间、准确性和错误进行了评分。参与者还完成了问卷调查,以评估模拟的益处和真实性。结果:试验1的模拟得分显著区分了专家参与者与新手参与者(P = 0.028)和医学生(P 5 0.001)。新住院医师/同行参与者的中位数得分随着重复试验而增加,并且在试验2时与专家得分不再有显著差异。与试验4的医学生得分相比,该组得分显著提高。在试验1和试验6之间,医学生(P = 0.018)和住院医师新手(P = 0.018)的得分均有显著提高。所有参与者都发现幻像在学习甲状腺FNA方面是有益的。主治内分泌学家和7名专家参与者中的6名都发现,超声显示的幻肢是真实的。两名主治内分泌学家中的一名和7名专家参与者中的5名认为触觉反馈是真实的。结论:我们设计了一种低成本的甲状腺FNA假体,具有良好的外观和结构效度。这个幻影可以用来训练住院医师项目中的程序技能,也可以用来评估技能的获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for assessing and improving quality of surgical performance: the current status and future Simulation training: a novel and effective way to improve knowledge and attitudes towards coroner’s court attendance Conflicting intra-departmental views on the importance of simulation in general surgery Occult metastatic axillary carcinoma masked underlying primary accessory breast carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1