Accounting for Alliances in Clausewitz’s Theory of War

Olivia A. Garard
{"title":"Accounting for Alliances in Clausewitz’s Theory of War","authors":"Olivia A. Garard","doi":"10.22618/tp.pjcv.20226.1.127.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Allies and alliances are deeply embedded in Clausewitz’s theory of war. Allies are a live and reactive means that may shift throughout a war. Alliances, often responsive to the balance of power, harness allies as a dynamic means. Both problematize Clausewitz’s initial, dual conception of war; they embody uncertainty and inject Politik. To account for allies and alliances entails reevaluating three fundamental Clausewitzian premises: that the defense is the stronger form of war; that the status quo has inertia; and that war has duration. Ultimately, any comprehensive view of Clausewitz’s theory of war demands the inclusion of allies and alliances.","PeriodicalId":220201,"journal":{"name":"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence","volume":"75 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22618/tp.pjcv.20226.1.127.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Allies and alliances are deeply embedded in Clausewitz’s theory of war. Allies are a live and reactive means that may shift throughout a war. Alliances, often responsive to the balance of power, harness allies as a dynamic means. Both problematize Clausewitz’s initial, dual conception of war; they embody uncertainty and inject Politik. To account for allies and alliances entails reevaluating three fundamental Clausewitzian premises: that the defense is the stronger form of war; that the status quo has inertia; and that war has duration. Ultimately, any comprehensive view of Clausewitz’s theory of war demands the inclusion of allies and alliances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克劳塞维茨战争理论中的联盟核算
同盟和联盟深深植根于克劳塞维茨的战争理论中。盟友是一种活跃的、反应性的手段,可能会在整个战争过程中发生变化。联盟通常是对权力平衡的反应,利用盟友作为一种动态手段。两者都对克劳塞维茨最初的双重战争概念提出了质疑;它们体现了不确定性,注入了政治色彩。要解释同盟和联盟,需要重新评估克劳塞维茨的三个基本前提:防御是更强大的战争形式;现状有惯性;这场战争是持续的。归根结底,对克劳塞维茨战争理论的任何全面看法都需要包括盟友和联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Haneke, Moral Violence and Morbid Curiosity Accounting for Alliances in Clausewitz’s Theory of War Three Platonic Themes in Clausewitz: A Forgotten Legacy The Conception of stasis and pleonexia in Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings: Platonic Influences and Bricolages ‘They’re Saved from the Blessings of Civilization’: Violence, Law, and Progress in the Westerns of John Ford
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1