The Unbundling of Mutual Funds’ Trading and Research Commissions: Have Investors Benefited?

Emelie Fröberg, M. Halling
{"title":"The Unbundling of Mutual Funds’ Trading and Research Commissions: Have Investors Benefited?","authors":"Emelie Fröberg, M. Halling","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3892441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One prominent aspect of the MiFID II regulation that became effective in Europe in 2018 is the unbundling of research and execution costs. We exploit the early adoption of this rule in Sweden already in 2016 to provide early evidence on the implications for fund investors. Using a diff-in-diff framework and mostly hand-collected data on bundled and unbundled commissions, we find basically no impact of the regulation on fund investors: neither total expense ratios nor fund performance changed in response to the unbundling. We also fail to document any information gains for investors’ fund selection process from the increased transparency of observing execution and research costs separately. Overall, we are skeptical that the unbundling of commissions has had any positive impact on fund investors.","PeriodicalId":251522,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal","volume":"59 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One prominent aspect of the MiFID II regulation that became effective in Europe in 2018 is the unbundling of research and execution costs. We exploit the early adoption of this rule in Sweden already in 2016 to provide early evidence on the implications for fund investors. Using a diff-in-diff framework and mostly hand-collected data on bundled and unbundled commissions, we find basically no impact of the regulation on fund investors: neither total expense ratios nor fund performance changed in response to the unbundling. We also fail to document any information gains for investors’ fund selection process from the increased transparency of observing execution and research costs separately. Overall, we are skeptical that the unbundling of commissions has had any positive impact on fund investors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同基金交易和研究佣金的拆分:投资者受益了吗?
2018年在欧洲生效的MiFID II法规的一个突出方面是将研究和执行成本分开。我们利用瑞典早在2016年就采用了这一规则,为基金投资者的影响提供了早期证据。使用“差中差”的框架和大部分手工收集的捆绑和非捆绑佣金数据,我们发现监管对基金投资者基本上没有影响:总费费率和基金业绩都没有因拆分而改变。我们也没有分别记录观察执行和研究成本的透明度提高对投资者基金选择过程的任何信息收益。总体而言,我们怀疑拆分佣金是否对基金投资者产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
XVA Estimates with Empirical Martingale Simulation Marginals Versus Copulas: Which Account For More Model Risk In Multivariate Risk Forecasting? Sensitivities-Based Method and Expected Shortfall for Market Risk Under FRTB and Its Impact on Options Risk Capital A 2-Factor model for inclusion of Voluntary Termination Risk in Automotive Retail Loan Portfolios Lessons from Estimating the Average Option-implied Volatility Term Structure for the Spanish Banking Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1