Forecasting models for maintenance work load with seasonal components

I. A. Salman
{"title":"Forecasting models for maintenance work load with seasonal components","authors":"I. A. Salman","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of applying time series forecasting techniques to the forecasting of maintenance work load. In particular, this paper discusses several models developed to forecast the electronics maintenance work load for a weather forecasting system located in Alaska. The maintenance work load for this system typically increases during the winter season. This is mostly due to the system's remote geographic locations and the additional travel time required to reach these locations during the harsh Alaskan winter. Several models were developed and evaluated on the basis of their data fit and forecasting accuracy of seasonal and non-seasonal electronics maintenance work load. In the first part of the analysis, a regression model that uses a serial autocorrelated error correction procedure was developed to model the non-seasonal components of the work load. Seasonal work load components were modeled using seasonal and cyclical indicator variables. The cyclical indicator variables were effective in modeling this system's seasonal work load behavior. A model that uses a combination of seasonal and cyclical indicator variables was also effective in this respect. In the second part of the analysis, seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) techniques were used to model and forecast maintenance work load. A brief description of these forecasting methods and the procedures used to identify an optimal work load forecasting model are provided. Two seasonal ARIMA models were developed: The first model used only maintenance predictor variables; the second model used a combination of maintenance predictor variables and cyclical indicator variables. All of the models were evaluated on the basis of their goodness-of-fit and forecasting accuracy. A seasonal ARIMA model that uses a combination of maintenance predictor variables and cyclical indicator variables had the best goodness-of-fit and provided the most accurate maintenance work load forecast. Cyclical indicator variables were found to be extremely effective in modeling the seasonal behavior of the maintenance work load in both the causal and stochastic models.","PeriodicalId":270494,"journal":{"name":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents the results of applying time series forecasting techniques to the forecasting of maintenance work load. In particular, this paper discusses several models developed to forecast the electronics maintenance work load for a weather forecasting system located in Alaska. The maintenance work load for this system typically increases during the winter season. This is mostly due to the system's remote geographic locations and the additional travel time required to reach these locations during the harsh Alaskan winter. Several models were developed and evaluated on the basis of their data fit and forecasting accuracy of seasonal and non-seasonal electronics maintenance work load. In the first part of the analysis, a regression model that uses a serial autocorrelated error correction procedure was developed to model the non-seasonal components of the work load. Seasonal work load components were modeled using seasonal and cyclical indicator variables. The cyclical indicator variables were effective in modeling this system's seasonal work load behavior. A model that uses a combination of seasonal and cyclical indicator variables was also effective in this respect. In the second part of the analysis, seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) techniques were used to model and forecast maintenance work load. A brief description of these forecasting methods and the procedures used to identify an optimal work load forecasting model are provided. Two seasonal ARIMA models were developed: The first model used only maintenance predictor variables; the second model used a combination of maintenance predictor variables and cyclical indicator variables. All of the models were evaluated on the basis of their goodness-of-fit and forecasting accuracy. A seasonal ARIMA model that uses a combination of maintenance predictor variables and cyclical indicator variables had the best goodness-of-fit and provided the most accurate maintenance work load forecast. Cyclical indicator variables were found to be extremely effective in modeling the seasonal behavior of the maintenance work load in both the causal and stochastic models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有季节性因素的维修工作量预测模型
本文介绍了将时间序列预测技术应用于维修工作量预测的结果。特别地,本文讨论了为预测位于阿拉斯加的天气预报系统的电子维修工作量而开发的几个模型。该系统的维护工作量通常在冬季增加。这主要是由于该系统的地理位置偏远,并且在阿拉斯加的严冬需要额外的旅行时间才能到达这些地点。针对季节性和非季节性电子维修工作量的数据拟合和预测精度,建立了几种模型并进行了评估。在分析的第一部分中,开发了一个使用序列自相关误差校正程序的回归模型来对工作量的非季节性成分进行建模。使用季节性和周期性指标变量对季节性工作量成分进行建模。周期指标变量可以有效地模拟该系统的季节性工作量行为。在这方面,结合使用季节性和周期性指标变量的模型也很有效。在分析的第二部分,采用季节自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)技术对维修工作量进行建模和预测。简要介绍了这些预测方法和用于确定最佳工作负荷预测模型的程序。建立了两个季节ARIMA模型:第一个模型仅使用维护预测变量;第二个模型使用了维修预测变量和周期指标变量的组合。根据拟合优度和预测精度对所有模型进行评估。使用维修预测变量和周期指标变量组合的季节性ARIMA模型具有最佳的拟合度,并提供了最准确的维修工作量预测。在因果模型和随机模型中,周期性指标变量在模拟维修工作量的季节性行为方面都非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forecasting models for maintenance work load with seasonal components An extended reliability growth model for managing and assessing corrective actions An accelerated life testing model involving performance degradation Lessons learned from development and implementation of a strategic life cycle model Criticality evaluation for spare parts initial provisioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1