TeSec: Accurate Server-side Attack Investigation for Web Applications

Ruihua Wang, Yihao Peng, Yi Sun, Xuancheng Zhang, Hai Wan, Xibin Zhao
{"title":"TeSec: Accurate Server-side Attack Investigation for Web Applications","authors":"Ruihua Wang, Yihao Peng, Yi Sun, Xuancheng Zhang, Hai Wan, Xibin Zhao","doi":"10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The user interface (UI) of web applications is usually the entry point of web attacks against enterprises and organizations. Finding the UI elements utilized by the intruders is of great importance both for attack interception and web application fixing. Current attack investigation methods targeting web UI either provide rough analysis results or have poor performance in high concurrency scenarios, which leads to heavy manual analysis work. In this paper, we propose TeSec, an accurate attack investigation method for web UI applications. TeSec makes use of two kinds of correlations. The first one, built from annotated audit log partitioned by PID/TID and delimiter-logs, captures the correspondence between audit log entries and web requests. The second one, modeled by an Aho-Corasick automaton built during system testing period, captures the correspondence between requests and the UI elements/events. Leveraging these two correlations, TeSec can accurately and automatically locate the UI elements/events (i.e., the root cause of the alarm) from an alarm, even in high concurrency scenarios. Furthermore, TeSec only needs to be deployed in the server and does not need to collect logs from the client-side browsers. We evaluate TeSec on 12 web applications. The experimental results show that the matching accuracy between UI events/elements and the alarm is above 99.6%. And security analysts only need to check no more than 2 UI elements on average for each individual forensics analysis. The maximum overhead of average response time and audit log space overhead are low (4.3% and 4.6% respectively).","PeriodicalId":439989,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The user interface (UI) of web applications is usually the entry point of web attacks against enterprises and organizations. Finding the UI elements utilized by the intruders is of great importance both for attack interception and web application fixing. Current attack investigation methods targeting web UI either provide rough analysis results or have poor performance in high concurrency scenarios, which leads to heavy manual analysis work. In this paper, we propose TeSec, an accurate attack investigation method for web UI applications. TeSec makes use of two kinds of correlations. The first one, built from annotated audit log partitioned by PID/TID and delimiter-logs, captures the correspondence between audit log entries and web requests. The second one, modeled by an Aho-Corasick automaton built during system testing period, captures the correspondence between requests and the UI elements/events. Leveraging these two correlations, TeSec can accurately and automatically locate the UI elements/events (i.e., the root cause of the alarm) from an alarm, even in high concurrency scenarios. Furthermore, TeSec only needs to be deployed in the server and does not need to collect logs from the client-side browsers. We evaluate TeSec on 12 web applications. The experimental results show that the matching accuracy between UI events/elements and the alarm is above 99.6%. And security analysts only need to check no more than 2 UI elements on average for each individual forensics analysis. The maximum overhead of average response time and audit log space overhead are low (4.3% and 4.6% respectively).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对Web应用程序进行准确的服务器端攻击调查
web应用程序的用户界面(UI)通常是针对企业和组织的web攻击的切入点。找到入侵者利用的UI元素对于拦截攻击和修复web应用程序都非常重要。目前针对web UI的攻击调查方法要么分析结果粗略,要么在高并发场景下性能较差,手工分析工作量较大。本文提出了一种针对web UI应用的精确攻击调查方法——TeSec。TeSec使用了两种相关性。第一个是由由PID/TID和分隔符日志划分的带注释的审计日志构建的,它捕获审计日志条目和web请求之间的对应关系。第二个是由在系统测试期间构建的Aho-Corasick自动机建模的,它捕获请求和UI元素/事件之间的对应关系。利用这两种相关性,TeSec可以准确、自动地从警报中定位UI元素/事件(即,警报的根本原因),即使在高并发场景中也是如此。此外,TeSec只需要部署在服务器中,不需要从客户端浏览器收集日志。我们在12个web应用程序上评估了TeSec。实验结果表明,UI事件/元素与报警的匹配精度达到99.6%以上。对于每个独立的取证分析,安全分析师平均只需要检查不超过2个UI元素。平均响应时间和审计日志空间的最大开销很低(分别为4.3%和4.6%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TeSec: Accurate Server-side Attack Investigation for Web Applications PLA-LiDAR: Physical Laser Attacks against LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicle One Key to Rule Them All: Secure Group Pairing for Heterogeneous IoT Devices SoK: Cryptographic Neural-Network Computation SoK: A Critical Evaluation of Efficient Website Fingerprinting Defenses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1