Limits of the Classical Functionalist Perspective on Sensory Substitution

M. Ptito, Katrine Iversen, M. Auvray, Ophelia Deroy, R. Kupers
{"title":"Limits of the Classical Functionalist Perspective on Sensory Substitution","authors":"M. Ptito, Katrine Iversen, M. Auvray, Ophelia Deroy, R. Kupers","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197266441.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tongue display unit (TDU) is a sensory substitution device that translates visual images into electrotactile stimulation that is transmitted to the tongue and leads to new perceptual skills following training. Trained users, including blind individuals, become capable of orientation discrimination, motion detection, shape recognition and they can also successfully use the TDU to navigate in an environment, locate objects and avoid obstacles. Many studies and discussions have focused on the effects of training at the behavioural level, and assumed that the effects shown in training blindfolded sighted individuals are similar to those observed in blind people. In doing so, we argue that behavioural research on sensory substitution shows a functionalist bias. Functionalism claims that mental processes can be individuated by their characteristic inputs and outputs, and that the physical realization of a given function introduces no relevant difference, as long as the function is the same. We emphasize here why this assumption biases the interpretation of sensory substitution devices.","PeriodicalId":415104,"journal":{"name":"Sensory Substitution and Augmentation","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensory Substitution and Augmentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266441.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The tongue display unit (TDU) is a sensory substitution device that translates visual images into electrotactile stimulation that is transmitted to the tongue and leads to new perceptual skills following training. Trained users, including blind individuals, become capable of orientation discrimination, motion detection, shape recognition and they can also successfully use the TDU to navigate in an environment, locate objects and avoid obstacles. Many studies and discussions have focused on the effects of training at the behavioural level, and assumed that the effects shown in training blindfolded sighted individuals are similar to those observed in blind people. In doing so, we argue that behavioural research on sensory substitution shows a functionalist bias. Functionalism claims that mental processes can be individuated by their characteristic inputs and outputs, and that the physical realization of a given function introduces no relevant difference, as long as the function is the same. We emphasize here why this assumption biases the interpretation of sensory substitution devices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古典功能主义感官替代观的局限性
舌头显示单元(TDU)是一种感官替代装置,它将视觉图像转化为传递到舌头的触觉电刺激,并在训练后产生新的感知技能。经过训练的用户,包括盲人,能够辨别方向,运动检测,形状识别,他们也可以成功地使用TDU在环境中导航,定位物体和避开障碍物。许多研究和讨论都集中在行为层面的训练效果上,并假设蒙住眼睛的视力正常的人在训练中所显示的效果与在盲人中观察到的效果相似。在此过程中,我们认为对感觉替代的行为研究显示出功能主义偏见。功能主义声称,心理过程可以通过其特征输入和输出来个性化,并且只要功能相同,给定功能的物理实现就不会引入相关差异。我们在这里强调为什么这种假设会影响对感觉替代装置的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limits of the Classical Functionalist Perspective on Sensory Substitution Rewired Animals and Sensory Substitution: The Cause Is Not Cortical Plasticity The Role of Noetic Feelings in Sensory Substitution What Can Sensory Substitution Tell Us about the Organization of the Brain? The Processing of What, Where, and How
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1