Osagbemiro Babatope Bamidele, Soroye Modupeoluwa Omotunde, Alade Grace Onyenashia
{"title":"The Effect of Adiposity on the Outcome of Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy","authors":"Osagbemiro Babatope Bamidele, Soroye Modupeoluwa Omotunde, Alade Grace Onyenashia","doi":"10.33425/2639-9490.1090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-surgical periodontal therapy constitutes the first step in controlling periodontal infections, and its outcome is affected by the presence of other systemic diseases and conditions. Obesity is a modifiable risk factor for periodontitis and its effect on the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy has not been clearly determined. Aim: To determine the impact of central adiposity on the outcome of non-surgical periodontal treatment in patients with periodontitis. Methodology: This prospective interventional study included 39 obese patients with periodontitis (Group A) and 39 normal?weight patients with periodontitis (Group B). The waist circumference (WC), waist/hip ratio (WHR), waist/height ratio (WHtR), Simplified oral hygiene index (OHIS), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), number of sites with PPD ≥ 4 mm, and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were measured at baseline and 3 months after non-surgical periodontal treatment. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables between the groups. Independent samples t-tests and paired t-test were used to analyse the numerical intergroup and intragroup data, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficients and multiple regression analyses were used to assess the strength and impact of central adiposity on periodontal treatment outcomes. Data were analysed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0 and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: At baseline, the mean PPD and CAL were comparable in both Groups A and B; while the mean percentage of sites with gingival BOP and percentage of sites with periodontitis were significantly higher in Group A. All periodontal parameters significantly improved after treatment in Groups A and B. However, participants in Group B had a better improvement in sites with gingival BOP and percentage of sites with periodontitis after treatment compared to Group A. Multiple regression analysis showed that central adiposity had a significant (P < 0.05) negative impact on the treatment outcome of gingival BOP, PPD and percentage of sites with periodontitis (PPD ≥ 4 mm) after adjusting for age, sex and socio-economic status. Conclusions: The findings indicated that central adiposity has a negative impact on gingival bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth and percentage of sites with periodontitis.","PeriodicalId":263229,"journal":{"name":"Oral Health and Dental science","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Health and Dental science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9490.1090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Non-surgical periodontal therapy constitutes the first step in controlling periodontal infections, and its outcome is affected by the presence of other systemic diseases and conditions. Obesity is a modifiable risk factor for periodontitis and its effect on the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy has not been clearly determined. Aim: To determine the impact of central adiposity on the outcome of non-surgical periodontal treatment in patients with periodontitis. Methodology: This prospective interventional study included 39 obese patients with periodontitis (Group A) and 39 normal?weight patients with periodontitis (Group B). The waist circumference (WC), waist/hip ratio (WHR), waist/height ratio (WHtR), Simplified oral hygiene index (OHIS), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), number of sites with PPD ≥ 4 mm, and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were measured at baseline and 3 months after non-surgical periodontal treatment. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables between the groups. Independent samples t-tests and paired t-test were used to analyse the numerical intergroup and intragroup data, respectively. Pearson’s correlation coefficients and multiple regression analyses were used to assess the strength and impact of central adiposity on periodontal treatment outcomes. Data were analysed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0 and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: At baseline, the mean PPD and CAL were comparable in both Groups A and B; while the mean percentage of sites with gingival BOP and percentage of sites with periodontitis were significantly higher in Group A. All periodontal parameters significantly improved after treatment in Groups A and B. However, participants in Group B had a better improvement in sites with gingival BOP and percentage of sites with periodontitis after treatment compared to Group A. Multiple regression analysis showed that central adiposity had a significant (P < 0.05) negative impact on the treatment outcome of gingival BOP, PPD and percentage of sites with periodontitis (PPD ≥ 4 mm) after adjusting for age, sex and socio-economic status. Conclusions: The findings indicated that central adiposity has a negative impact on gingival bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth and percentage of sites with periodontitis.
背景:非手术牙周治疗是控制牙周感染的第一步,其结果受其他全身性疾病和状况的影响。肥胖是牙周炎的一个可改变的危险因素,其对非手术牙周治疗结果的影响尚未明确确定。目的:探讨中心性肥胖对牙周炎非手术治疗效果的影响。方法:本前瞻性介入研究纳入39例肥胖牙周炎患者(A组)和39例正常牙周炎患者(A组)。测量牙周炎患者的腰围(WC)、腰臀比(WHR)、腰高比(WHtR)、简化口腔卫生指数(OHIS)、探诊出血(BOP)、探诊袋深度(PPD)、PPD≥4mm的部位数量和临床附著损失(CAL),分别于基线和非手术牙周治疗后3个月进行测量。组间分类变量比较采用卡方检验。分别采用独立样本t检验和配对t检验对组间和组内数据进行数值分析。使用Pearson相关系数和多元回归分析来评估中心性肥胖对牙周治疗结果的强度和影响。使用IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0对数据进行分析,统计学显著性设为P < 0.05。结果:在基线时,A组和B组的平均PPD和CAL相当;而A组牙龈BOP部位的平均百分比和牙周炎部位的平均百分比均显著高于A组和b组,治疗后牙周参数均显著改善。与a组相比,B组治疗后牙龈BOP部位和牙周炎部位百分比的改善更好。多元回归分析显示,在调整年龄、性别和社会经济地位后,中枢性肥胖对牙龈BOP、PPD和牙周炎部位(PPD≥4 mm)的治疗结果有显著(P < 0.05)的负面影响。结论:中枢性肥胖对探诊时牙龈出血、探诊袋深度和牙周炎发生部位的比例有负面影响。