Collections Data, Tools, and Strategy: Applying R, Tableau, and Excel to Print Assessment

L. Jahnke, C. Palazzolo
{"title":"Collections Data, Tools, and Strategy: Applying R, Tableau, and Excel to Print\n Assessment","authors":"L. Jahnke, C. Palazzolo","doi":"10.5703/1288284317141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As is the case at most academic libraries, collection assessment has become an\n essential component of collection management and development work. Although much of the\n assessment focus has disproportionately fallen on e-resources, print collections remain\n fruitful areas for evaluation and review. At Emory, print collections, including a\n complex approval plan, continue to be a significant component of our overarching\n collection strategy (in volume and expenditure). However, shifting priorities for\n library space and the growth of interdisciplinary programs and centers within the\n University are placing a higher demand on subject librarians for communication and\n coordinated decision-making regarding print acquisitions. As a result, we are currently\n preparing for a comprehensive print collection review, of which the approval plan is an\n integral component. This assessment will inform a more coherent print strategy, which\n effectively and efficiently meets research and teaching requirements as well as\n administrative needs. Using data cleaning and visualization tools, such as R, Excel, and\n Tableau, we have enriched our local usage data with detailed Gobi approval data (e.g.,\n series, publisher, subject, etc.) and profile parameters. Merging these data types and\n enriching local use data will allow us to analyze the print collection in a more nuanced\n fashion and ask questions that do not require the LC classification framework. This\n analysis considers the development of additional tools and approaches that facilitate\n subject specialist communication with collection management and overall collaborative\n decision-making, especially in cross disciplinary areas.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As is the case at most academic libraries, collection assessment has become an essential component of collection management and development work. Although much of the assessment focus has disproportionately fallen on e-resources, print collections remain fruitful areas for evaluation and review. At Emory, print collections, including a complex approval plan, continue to be a significant component of our overarching collection strategy (in volume and expenditure). However, shifting priorities for library space and the growth of interdisciplinary programs and centers within the University are placing a higher demand on subject librarians for communication and coordinated decision-making regarding print acquisitions. As a result, we are currently preparing for a comprehensive print collection review, of which the approval plan is an integral component. This assessment will inform a more coherent print strategy, which effectively and efficiently meets research and teaching requirements as well as administrative needs. Using data cleaning and visualization tools, such as R, Excel, and Tableau, we have enriched our local usage data with detailed Gobi approval data (e.g., series, publisher, subject, etc.) and profile parameters. Merging these data types and enriching local use data will allow us to analyze the print collection in a more nuanced fashion and ask questions that do not require the LC classification framework. This analysis considers the development of additional tools and approaches that facilitate subject specialist communication with collection management and overall collaborative decision-making, especially in cross disciplinary areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收集数据,工具和策略:应用R, Tableau和Excel来打印评估
与大多数学术图书馆的情况一样,馆藏评估已成为馆藏管理和发展工作的重要组成部分。虽然大部分评估重点不成比例地落在电子资源上,但印刷馆藏仍然是评估和审查的富有成效的领域。在埃默里大学,印刷品收藏,包括一个复杂的审批计划,仍然是我们总体收藏战略的重要组成部分(在数量和支出方面)。然而,图书馆空间的优先级变化以及大学内跨学科项目和中心的增长对学科图书馆员提出了更高的要求,要求他们就印刷采办进行沟通和协调决策。因此,我们目前正在准备全面的印刷品收藏审查,审批计划是其中不可或缺的组成部分。这项评估将为更连贯的印刷战略提供信息,从而有效地满足研究和教学需要以及行政需要。使用数据清理和可视化工具,如R、Excel和Tableau,我们用详细的戈壁审批数据(例如,系列、出版商、主题等)和配置文件参数丰富了本地使用数据。合并这些数据类型和丰富本地使用数据将使我们能够以更细致的方式分析印刷品收藏,并提出不需要LC分类框架的问题。该分析考虑了其他工具和方法的发展,以促进学科专家与收集管理和整体协作决策的沟通,特别是在跨学科领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Synthesis: Research Resources to Research Experiences The Time Has Come... To Build, Reflect, and Analyze Connections Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data Collections Data, Tools, and Strategy: Applying R, Tableau, and Excel to Print Assessment Acquiring E-books – Does (Should) Workflow Play a Role? A Collaborative Imperative? Libraries and the Emerging Scholarly Communication Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1