Libraries should develop a new model for providing information resources and analytical tools for the use of scholars working in the current multidisciplinary research environment. This model, A New Synthesis, based on today’s research experience should replace the present concept of the “collection budget.” Sources are proliferating and traditional scholarly resources are no longer at the core. Research itself has changed. Previously, finding information was primary, but now information is plentiful and today’s challenges are to understand, analyze, and extract insight from these vast resources. To address this challenge, newly designed libraries are appearing that are radically different, reconceptualizing learning spaces, technological infrastructure, and research labs for scholars and students. Yet, the concept of the collection budget is little changed. We must embrace a paradigm that allows us to envision holistically the development and investment necessary to support current research. To enable expanded capacity for supporting today’s Grand Challenge research and to ensure the critical relevancy of academic libraries in this endeavor, we must employ a new synthesis. Sources can no longer be viewed independently from the tools needed to analyze them. Critical elements include: redeploying funds to an array of open platforms; shifting the focus from access to knowledge creation; and investing in spaces, technology, and people that will help researchers solve problems in new ways. We are at a moment when building these services and placing them at the heart of libraries requires fundamental organizational and financial change. Reconceiving current spending on collections is essential to this change.
{"title":"A New Synthesis: Research Resources to Research Experiences","authors":"H. Hickerson","doi":"10.5703/1288284317153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317153","url":null,"abstract":"Libraries should develop a new model for providing information resources and\u0000 analytical tools for the use of scholars working in the current multidisciplinary\u0000 research environment. This model, A New Synthesis, based on today’s research experience\u0000 should replace the present concept of the “collection budget.” Sources are proliferating\u0000 and traditional scholarly resources are no longer at the core. Research itself has\u0000 changed. Previously, finding information was primary, but now information is plentiful\u0000 and today’s challenges are to understand, analyze, and extract insight from these vast\u0000 resources. To address this challenge, newly designed libraries are appearing that are\u0000 radically different, reconceptualizing learning spaces, technological infrastructure,\u0000 and research labs for scholars and students. Yet, the concept of the collection budget\u0000 is little changed. We must embrace a paradigm that allows us to envision holistically\u0000 the development and investment necessary to support current research. To enable expanded\u0000 capacity for supporting today’s Grand Challenge research and to ensure the critical\u0000 relevancy of academic libraries in this endeavor, we must employ a new synthesis.\u0000 Sources can no longer be viewed independently from the tools needed to analyze them.\u0000 Critical elements include: redeploying funds to an array of open platforms; shifting the\u0000 focus from access to knowledge creation; and investing in spaces, technology, and people\u0000 that will help researchers solve problems in new ways. We are at a moment when building\u0000 these services and placing them at the heart of libraries requires fundamental\u0000 organizational and financial change. Reconceiving current spending on collections is\u0000 essential to this change.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124652221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jordan Sly, Leigh Ann DePope, Cynthia Frank, S. Ritchie
This paper will address the development process of a qualitative evaluation tool to aid in the thorough analysis of library resources at the University of Maryland. Specifically, our project looks at the use and added value of this tool for the building, reflecting, and analyzing the connections between qualitative and quantitative data. This will allow for more meaningful justifications of budgetary decisions compared to cost and use metrics alone. Given the necessity for meticulous review of continuing resources, our project addresses a request for enhanced transparency from the university faculty and library oversight bodies and serves as a useful tool for accountability and justification of impactful decisions for stakeholders internally and externally. We will discuss the extant literature and the need for this type of tool, the development process including the output planning and data input format, the initial reception of the project, and future goals and planning for our initial usage. Additionally, we will demonstrate the use of the tool, model output, and discuss options for visualizations, storage, and retrieval of input data.
{"title":"The Time Has Come... To Build, Reflect, and Analyze Connections Between Qualitative\u0000 and Quantitative Data","authors":"Jordan Sly, Leigh Ann DePope, Cynthia Frank, S. Ritchie","doi":"10.5703/1288284317144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317144","url":null,"abstract":"This paper will address the development process of a qualitative evaluation tool\u0000 to aid in the thorough analysis of library resources at the University of Maryland.\u0000 Specifically, our project looks at the use and added value of this tool for the\u0000 building, reflecting, and analyzing the connections between qualitative and quantitative\u0000 data. This will allow for more meaningful justifications of budgetary decisions compared\u0000 to cost and use metrics alone. Given the necessity for meticulous review of continuing\u0000 resources, our project addresses a request for enhanced transparency from the university\u0000 faculty and library oversight bodies and serves as a useful tool for accountability and\u0000 justification of impactful decisions for stakeholders internally and externally. We will\u0000 discuss the extant literature and the need for this type of tool, the development\u0000 process including the output planning and data input format, the initial reception of\u0000 the project, and future goals and planning for our initial usage. Additionally, we will\u0000 demonstrate the use of the tool, model output, and discuss options for visualizations,\u0000 storage, and retrieval of input data.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114524331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Remote storage for large collections is becoming common, making those books inaccessible for physical browsing by researchers. The main libraries at Temple University and the University of Central Florida (UCF) each have approximately 1.3 million print items on-site. Both libraries are storing 90% of their collections in automated retrieval systems with 10% remaining available for browsing in open stacks. In Part 1, “Choosing What Shows,” Karen Kohn, Temple’s Collection Analysis Librarian, describes the decisions and processes used for the 10% left physically visible. This second part explores UCF’s efforts to improve discoverability of the items in storage. The visual aspects of a book (height, multi-volume, etc.) that often provide useful clues regarding the content disappear when the patron can only view a list of search results on a computer screen. How can the loss of these visual clues be mitigated? Online browsing guides have been created at UCF to help researchers explore the hierarchical subject structure of call numbers. Other finding tools and displays may also improve awareness of stored materials.
{"title":"Tip of the Iceberg: Part 2, Discovering What's Hidden","authors":"R. Gause","doi":"10.5703/1288284317151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317151","url":null,"abstract":"Remote storage for large collections is becoming common, making those books\u0000 inaccessible for physical browsing by researchers. The main libraries at Temple\u0000 University and the University of Central Florida (UCF) each have approximately 1.3\u0000 million print items on-site. Both libraries are storing 90% of their collections in\u0000 automated retrieval systems with 10% remaining available for browsing in open stacks. In\u0000 Part 1, “Choosing What Shows,” Karen Kohn, Temple’s Collection Analysis Librarian,\u0000 describes the decisions and processes used for the 10% left physically visible. This\u0000 second part explores UCF’s efforts to improve discoverability of the items in storage.\u0000 The visual aspects of a book (height, multi-volume, etc.) that often provide useful\u0000 clues regarding the content disappear when the patron can only view a list of search\u0000 results on a computer screen. How can the loss of these visual clues be mitigated?\u0000 Online browsing guides have been created at UCF to help researchers explore the\u0000 hierarchical subject structure of call numbers. Other finding tools and displays may\u0000 also improve awareness of stored materials.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126727890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The discovery layer is commonly used in libraries to provide a more “Google-like” experience that offers one-stop searching. The original selling point of the discovery layer was that journal articles could be retrieved as well as monographs. But as libraries have acquired many other formats, particularly non-print, the discovery layer has struggled to provide results that include these “atypical” resources. Metadata is crucial to the discovery layer because it is what is used for the search. The higher the quality of metadata, the better the retrieval results will be. NISO has provided a list of elements to be considered best practices when creating metadata for the discovery layer. Not everything a library has available can be found through the discovery layer. This is a particular problem for those items who have their metadata stored only in an institutional repository. These repositories are often not loaded into the discovery layer. Solving discovery layer retrieval problems will take all parties working together on solutions. Then all relevant results can be delivered, and fulfill the goal of “one-stop” searching.
{"title":"Representation of Atypical Resources in the Discovery Layer: Metadata and\u0000 Cataloging Aspects","authors":"Brian J. Falato","doi":"10.5703/1288284317180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317180","url":null,"abstract":"The discovery layer is commonly used in libraries to provide a more “Google-like”\u0000 experience that offers one-stop searching. The original selling point of the discovery\u0000 layer was that journal articles could be retrieved as well as monographs. But as\u0000 libraries have acquired many other formats, particularly non-print, the discovery layer\u0000 has struggled to provide results that include these “atypical” resources. Metadata is\u0000 crucial to the discovery layer because it is what is used for the search. The higher the\u0000 quality of metadata, the better the retrieval results will be. NISO has provided a list\u0000 of elements to be considered best practices when creating metadata for the discovery\u0000 layer. Not everything a library has available can be found through the discovery layer.\u0000 This is a particular problem for those items who have their metadata stored only in an\u0000 institutional repository. These repositories are often not loaded into the discovery\u0000 layer. Solving discovery layer retrieval problems will take all parties working together\u0000 on solutions. Then all relevant results can be delivered, and fulfill the goal of\u0000 “one-stop” searching.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129768246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Librarians have been receiving COUNTER Release 5 reports since February 2019 and are becoming familiar with the new robust usage data. In this paper three experts explain how the new usage reports provide greater clarity and how they give insight into users’ actions. Athena Hoeppner outlines the new reports and metrics and explains how to interpret book usage data and how to use the data effectively in decision making process. Sonja Lendi focuses on journal usage data and the differences between Release 4 and Release 5 of the COUNTER Code of Practice. She also explains Distributed Usage Logging (DUL). This protocol enables publishers to capture traditional usage activity related to their content that happens on sites other than their own so they can provide reports of “total usage” regardless of where that usage happens. Kornelia Junge explains how librarians can use Microsoft Excel to analyse usage.
{"title":"New usage reports, new insights! How to use your COUNTER data in decision making\u0000 processes","authors":"Athena Hoeppner, Sonja Lendi, K. Junge","doi":"10.5703/1288284317140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317140","url":null,"abstract":"Librarians have been receiving COUNTER Release 5 reports since February 2019 and\u0000 are becoming familiar with the new robust usage data. In this paper three experts\u0000 explain how the new usage reports provide greater clarity and how they give insight into\u0000 users’ actions. Athena Hoeppner outlines the new reports and metrics and explains how to\u0000 interpret book usage data and how to use the data effectively in decision making\u0000 process. Sonja Lendi focuses on journal usage data and the differences between Release 4\u0000 and Release 5 of the COUNTER Code of Practice. She also explains Distributed Usage\u0000 Logging (DUL). This protocol enables publishers to capture traditional usage activity\u0000 related to their content that happens on sites other than their own so they can provide\u0000 reports of “total usage” regardless of where that usage happens. Kornelia Junge explains\u0000 how librarians can use Microsoft Excel to analyse usage.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128866943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C. Feather, S. Rouhi, Anneliese S Taylor, Kimberly L. Armstrong
Libraries, consortia, and publishers are exploring new models to support Open Access (OA) content. Native OA journal publishers are facing a different set of challenges as there is no existing library subscription base to transform into support for OA. Author-pays OA models are challenging to the ecosystem for a variety of reasons. Large institutions with heavy scholarly output may pay more, small institutions that use the content but publish less are wondering what role they will play, and authors from the global south may not have funding to pay Article Processing Charges (APCs). What new models are under exploration to address the complexity of funder mandates, reduce administrative burden of complex APC models, and the need to be more inclusive of a diverse community?
{"title":"The Time Has Come…For Next-Generation Open Access Models","authors":"C. Feather, S. Rouhi, Anneliese S Taylor, Kimberly L. Armstrong","doi":"10.5703/1288284317200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317200","url":null,"abstract":"Libraries, consortia, and publishers are exploring new models to support Open\u0000 Access (OA) content. Native OA journal publishers are facing a different set of\u0000 challenges as there is no existing library subscription base to transform into support\u0000 for OA. Author-pays OA models are challenging to the ecosystem for a variety of reasons.\u0000 Large institutions with heavy scholarly output may pay more, small institutions that use\u0000 the content but publish less are wondering what role they will play, and authors from\u0000 the global south may not have funding to pay Article Processing Charges (APCs). What new\u0000 models are under exploration to address the complexity of funder mandates, reduce\u0000 administrative burden of complex APC models, and the need to be more inclusive of a\u0000 diverse community?","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115756825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Beth R. Bernhardt, Lorcan Dempsey, Jason S. Price, A. Wise
We’re in a period of rapid transition. Libraries are focusing on decisions, strategies, and choices that are best for their home institutions, yet also driving change by collaborating in energetic new ways. This panel will review key new trends and challenges, including collaborative collections, transformative open access agreements, and consortial experimentation, highlighting opportunities for both libraries and consortia.
{"title":"A Collaborative Imperative? Libraries and the Emerging Scholarly Communication\u0000 Future","authors":"Beth R. Bernhardt, Lorcan Dempsey, Jason S. Price, A. Wise","doi":"10.5703/1288284317190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317190","url":null,"abstract":"We’re in a period of rapid transition. Libraries are focusing on decisions,\u0000 strategies, and choices that are best for their home institutions, yet also driving\u0000 change by collaborating in energetic new ways. This panel will review key new trends and\u0000 challenges, including collaborative collections, transformative open access agreements,\u0000 and consortial experimentation, highlighting opportunities for both libraries and\u0000 consortia.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114897392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Libraries and publishers rely on transactional data to support evidence-based decision making. However, by itself quantitative information does not provide a full picture. To anticipate the evolving needs of our audience we also need to hear from the individual users themselves. In this article, I will review the findings from several recent examples survey-based research into the question of how students use reference materials in and outside of their libraries. What are students actually saying about their needs and preferences when it comes to reference? While some uses cases for reference are moving out of the library into the open web not all have. What we hear students say is that they continue to have an unmet need for long-form, contextual guidance. They say they have trouble locating this content, but that the library is the first place they look for it. This is a risk because if students cannot find in-depth summary content in their library they will migrate to the open web where they lose the benefits of librarian intermediation as both a curator of sources and as a guide via instruction.
{"title":"What are students saying about their reference needs?","authors":"D. Zucca","doi":"10.5703/1288284317147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317147","url":null,"abstract":"Libraries and publishers rely on transactional data to support evidence-based\u0000 decision making. However, by itself quantitative information does not provide a full\u0000 picture. To anticipate the evolving needs of our audience we also need to hear from the\u0000 individual users themselves. In this article, I will review the findings from several\u0000 recent examples survey-based research into the question of how students use reference\u0000 materials in and outside of their libraries. What are students actually saying about\u0000 their needs and preferences when it comes to reference? While some uses cases for\u0000 reference are moving out of the library into the open web not all have. What we hear\u0000 students say is that they continue to have an unmet need for long-form, contextual\u0000 guidance. They say they have trouble locating this content, but that the library is the\u0000 first place they look for it. This is a risk because if students cannot find in-depth\u0000 summary content in their library they will migrate to the open web where they lose the\u0000 benefits of librarian intermediation as both a curator of sources and as a guide via\u0000 instruction.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129608532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index","authors":"Bruce Strauch","doi":"10.5703/1288284317271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317271","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116608978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Should the book and the journal article remain the primary forms of scholarly production in the digital age? That is a question asked by publishing scholar Kathleen Fitzpatrick. She proposes a role for “inbetween” work. Indeed, there is a history of “grey literature” in many fields and of the short book. And academic publishers are experimenting with the form. In this context, an explanation of the rationale for and origins of the Charleston Briefings illustrates the possibilities for experimenting with inbetween publishing featuring subjects of interest to librarians and professionals in allied fields. There follows an account of the genesis, planning, and composition of a forthcoming Briefing on the scholarly workflow. While the length of the Briefings may appear to be its defining element, how it manages its scholarly and educational tasks is the key to meeting its goals and the needs of readers. In this case “inbetweenness” can be an advantage for representing the subject’s timeliness and utility while managing the rapidly growing literature on its different dimensions, including what the digital evolution of the scholarly workflow means for library services.
{"title":"Professional Learning and Inbetween Publishing: The Tasks of the Charleston\u0000 Briefings","authors":"S. Weiland, Matthew Ismail","doi":"10.5703/1288284317202","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317202","url":null,"abstract":"Should the book and the journal article remain the primary forms of scholarly\u0000 production in the digital age? That is a question asked by publishing scholar Kathleen\u0000 Fitzpatrick. She proposes a role for “inbetween” work. Indeed, there is a history of\u0000 “grey literature” in many fields and of the short book. And academic publishers are\u0000 experimenting with the form. In this context, an explanation of the rationale for and\u0000 origins of the Charleston Briefings illustrates the possibilities for experimenting with\u0000 inbetween publishing featuring subjects of interest to librarians and professionals in\u0000 allied fields. There follows an account of the genesis, planning, and composition of a\u0000 forthcoming Briefing on the scholarly workflow. While the length of the Briefings may\u0000 appear to be its defining element, how it manages its scholarly and educational tasks is\u0000 the key to meeting its goals and the needs of readers. In this case “inbetweenness” can\u0000 be an advantage for representing the subject’s timeliness and utility while managing the\u0000 rapidly growing literature on its different dimensions, including what the digital\u0000 evolution of the scholarly workflow means for library services.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"520 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131826600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：