Comparing Public Library Management under Designated Administrator System with Direct Management: Forcusing on Reference Service

Yuhiro Mizunuma, Keita Tsuji
{"title":"Comparing Public Library Management under Designated Administrator System with Direct Management: Forcusing on Reference Service","authors":"Yuhiro Mizunuma, Keita Tsuji","doi":"10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2016.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Japan, public libraries have long been managed by local governments. However, with the introduction of the designated administrator system (DAS) in 2003, other organizations including private companies began to take over library management. In this study, we examine the differences between public libraries managed under DAS and those managed directly by local government (LG), with a focus on reference services. We compare the contents of the services provided and the number of reference questions received. The results show that LG libraries tend to answer users' questions directly, whereas DAS libraries tend to develop environments where users can find answers for themselves, such as by providing PCs connected to the Web and by offering classes on information-seeking skills. Our analysis shows that the DAS libraries receive more reference questions than LG libraries.","PeriodicalId":272739,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","volume":"2021 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2016.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In Japan, public libraries have long been managed by local governments. However, with the introduction of the designated administrator system (DAS) in 2003, other organizations including private companies began to take over library management. In this study, we examine the differences between public libraries managed under DAS and those managed directly by local government (LG), with a focus on reference services. We compare the contents of the services provided and the number of reference questions received. The results show that LG libraries tend to answer users' questions directly, whereas DAS libraries tend to develop environments where users can find answers for themselves, such as by providing PCs connected to the Web and by offering classes on information-seeking skills. Our analysis shows that the DAS libraries receive more reference questions than LG libraries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专管制下公共图书馆管理与直接管理制的比较:以参考咨询服务为重点
在日本,公共图书馆长期由地方政府管理。但是,从2003年开始引入指定管理员制(DAS)后,民间企业等其他机构开始接管图书馆的管理工作。在本研究中,我们考察了由DAS管理的公共图书馆与由地方政府直接管理的公共图书馆之间的差异,重点是参考咨询服务。我们比较所提供服务的内容和收到的参考问题的数目。结果显示,LG图书馆倾向于直接回答用户的问题,而DAS图书馆则倾向于开发用户可以自己找到答案的环境,例如提供连接到网络的个人电脑和提供信息寻找技能课程。我们的分析表明,DAS图书馆收到的参考问题比LG图书馆多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Personalized Feedback System by Visual Biometric Data Analysis A Design and Implementation of Global Distributed POSIX File System on the Top of Multiple Independent Cloud Services Comparing Public Library Management under Designated Administrator System with Direct Management: Forcusing on Reference Service Robust Intelligent Total-Sliding-Mode Control for the Synchronization of Uncertain Chaotic Systems Extraction of Myocardial Fibrosis from MR Using Fuzzy Soft Thresholding Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1