Conjugalidade dos pais: percepções de indivíduos casados e solteiros

Fábio Scorsolini-Comin, A. Fontaine, Manoel Antônio dos Santos
{"title":"Conjugalidade dos pais: percepções de indivíduos casados e solteiros","authors":"Fábio Scorsolini-Comin, A. Fontaine, Manoel Antônio dos Santos","doi":"10.15689/AP.2015.1402.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parents' conjugality: Perceptions of married and single individuals This study aimed to compare childrens' perceptions on the conjugality of their parents in married and unmarried individuals. There were 374 participants divided into three groups: married (n=118), singles who date (n=140), and singles who do not date (n=116). The instruments used were the Scale of Subjective Well-being, Parental Conjugality Questionnaire and Factorial Scale of Couple Relationship Satisfaction. Descriptive analyses, correlation, and group comparisons were assessed. There were significant differences in parental marital perceptions, with the singles showing a more positive perception. This finding could be explained by the age difference between the groups and not necessarily because they are married or single. The results suggest that developmental age is a relevant variable because of the experience accumulated over time, which would allow a more mature assessment of the family of origin.","PeriodicalId":177093,"journal":{"name":"Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15689/AP.2015.1402.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Parents' conjugality: Perceptions of married and single individuals This study aimed to compare childrens' perceptions on the conjugality of their parents in married and unmarried individuals. There were 374 participants divided into three groups: married (n=118), singles who date (n=140), and singles who do not date (n=116). The instruments used were the Scale of Subjective Well-being, Parental Conjugality Questionnaire and Factorial Scale of Couple Relationship Satisfaction. Descriptive analyses, correlation, and group comparisons were assessed. There were significant differences in parental marital perceptions, with the singles showing a more positive perception. This finding could be explained by the age difference between the groups and not necessarily because they are married or single. The results suggest that developmental age is a relevant variable because of the experience accumulated over time, which would allow a more mature assessment of the family of origin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母的婚姻:已婚和单身人士的看法
父母的配偶性:已婚和单身个体的看法本研究旨在比较已婚和未婚个体中儿童对父母配偶性的看法。共有374名参与者被分为三组:已婚(118人)、约会的单身人士(140人)和不约会的单身人士(116人)。使用的工具有主观幸福感量表、父母配偶性问卷和夫妻关系满意度因子量表。描述性分析、相关性和组间比较进行评估。父母对婚姻的看法存在显著差异,单身人士表现出更积极的看法。这一发现可以用年龄组之间的年龄差异来解释,而不一定是因为他们已婚或单身。结果表明,发育年龄是一个相关的变量,因为随着时间的推移积累了经验,这将允许对原生家庭进行更成熟的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Escala de Crenças Gerais Conspiratórias (ECGC): Desenvolvimento e Evidências Psicométricas Adaptação Transcultural de Instrumentos Avaliativos em Cuidados Paliativos: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura O Impacto do Ensino Público e Privado na Memória de Crianças Análise Confirmatória e de Invariância do Inventário de Habilidades Sociais para Situações Terapêuticas Difíceispara o Contexto Clínico Rorschach e Residência Médica: Estudo Prospectivo com Residentes de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1