The Securities Act Registration Framework

Marc I. Steinberg
{"title":"The Securities Act Registration Framework","authors":"Marc I. Steinberg","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197583142.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the Securities Act registration framework. In its determination to maintain a transaction-based Securities Act registration framework while making necessary adjustments, the SEC has appropriately acted. With the improvements made, the registration framework functions in a relatively efficient manner and generally provides investors with adequate safeguards. Nonetheless, significant deficiencies exist which are addressed in this chapter. Among the improvements that should be implemented are: mandating that all material information (absent a meritorious business justification) be contained in a registration statement; limiting the use of incorporation by reference to those issuers whose securities in fact trade in efficient markets; and requiring that a sufficiently comprehensive summary section be included in the statutory prospectus. The chapter also focuses on due diligence and the integrated disclosure system. In the context of incorporation by reference and shelf registered offerings, the dilemma faced by outside directors and underwriters in performing their due diligence functions can be largely ameliorated by: for outside directors, the presence of a vibrant disclosure committee (comprised solely of outside directors) that is actively engaged in the disclosure process; and, for underwriters, the retention by a subject company’s audit or disclosure committee of a reputable law firm to conduct continuous due diligence on the prospective underwriter’s behalf.","PeriodicalId":443439,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Securities Law","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Securities Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197583142.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter addresses the Securities Act registration framework. In its determination to maintain a transaction-based Securities Act registration framework while making necessary adjustments, the SEC has appropriately acted. With the improvements made, the registration framework functions in a relatively efficient manner and generally provides investors with adequate safeguards. Nonetheless, significant deficiencies exist which are addressed in this chapter. Among the improvements that should be implemented are: mandating that all material information (absent a meritorious business justification) be contained in a registration statement; limiting the use of incorporation by reference to those issuers whose securities in fact trade in efficient markets; and requiring that a sufficiently comprehensive summary section be included in the statutory prospectus. The chapter also focuses on due diligence and the integrated disclosure system. In the context of incorporation by reference and shelf registered offerings, the dilemma faced by outside directors and underwriters in performing their due diligence functions can be largely ameliorated by: for outside directors, the presence of a vibrant disclosure committee (comprised solely of outside directors) that is actively engaged in the disclosure process; and, for underwriters, the retention by a subject company’s audit or disclosure committee of a reputable law firm to conduct continuous due diligence on the prospective underwriter’s behalf.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
证券法注册框架
本章讨论证券法注册框架。在做出必要调整的同时,美国证券交易委员会决定维持一个基于交易的证券法注册框架,并采取了适当的行动。随着这些改进,注册框架以相对有效的方式运作,并普遍为投资者提供充分的保障。尽管如此,本章仍存在重大缺陷。应实施的改进措施包括:强制要求在注册声明中包含所有重要信息(如果没有值得赞扬的商业理由);将公司注册的使用限制在其证券实际上在有效市场交易的发行人;并要求在法定招股说明书中包含足够全面的摘要部分。本章还重点介绍了尽职调查和综合披露制度。在参考注册公司和货架注册发行的背景下,外部董事和承销商在履行其尽职调查职能时面临的困境可以通过以下方式得到很大改善:对于外部董事来说,一个活跃的披露委员会(完全由外部董事组成)的存在,积极参与披露过程;对于承销商来说,由标的公司的审计或披露委员会聘请一家声誉良好的律师事务所,代表潜在承销商进行持续的尽职调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insider Trading The Securities Act Registration Framework Private Securities Litigation Rethinking Securities Law—Laying the Groundwork Mergers and Acquisitions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1