DESIGN OF TRANSITION JUNCTIONS OF SILOS’ CONICAL HOPPERS ACCORDING TO EUROPEAN STANDARD EUROCODE

А. Makhinko, N. Makhinko
{"title":"DESIGN OF TRANSITION JUNCTIONS OF SILOS’ CONICAL HOPPERS ACCORDING TO EUROPEAN STANDARD EUROCODE","authors":"А. Makhinko, N. Makhinko","doi":"10.30838/j.bpsacea.2312.280223.59.919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem statement. Today, the food security of the world is one of the main issues for the political, economic and scientific community, and the recent crisis with the export of Ukrainian grain only intensifies the urgency of the problem. The important part of this issue is creation of reliable and safe grain storage silos. An analysis of recent accidents in silos, especially with conical hoppers, revealed a range of imperfections in outdated regulatory practices that Ukraine inherited from the Soviet building norm system. A limited list of agricultural crops, ignoring the statistical spread of their physical and mechanical characteristics, not differentiating between the stress-strain state for filling and discharge silos, the absolute absence of guidelines and recommendations for the design of principal connections - this is a far from complete list of shortcomings and omissions of outdated Soviet standards. With the entry into force of the new Ukrainian norm DBN V.2.6-221:2021 “Designs of steel silos with a corrugated wall for grain”, the situation should have changed. Firstly, the new standards take into account the world experience in design, construction and fabrication of silos, and secondly, they have a direct and legitimate reference to the necessary standards of the Eurocode system, in which a modern engineer can find answers to a wide range of practical questions. Unfortunately, the introduction of this, without exaggeration, modern and extremely important standard into construction practice is constantly ignored. On the one hand, this is due to the unwillingness of Ukrainian manufacturers to switch to new European and more rigid requirements for reliability and safety, on the other hand, the fear of Ukrainian engineers in front of the complex and extensive Eurocode standardization system. The purpose of the article (ignoring the financial commercialism of individual silo manufacturers) is explain to domestic designers a few provisions of the new DBN V.2.6-221:2021 related to the design of silos with a conical hopper. In particular, the design of one of the very important units at the point of transition of the cylindrical part of the silo to the conical hopper. Methodology. For this, the general ideology and methodology of the limit state method, implemented in the Eurocode standards through the system of partial reliability factors, as well as classical methods of structural mechanics, which are still not reflected in the system of building regulation of modern Ukraine, are used. Results. As a result, clear recommendations for the design of the transition junction of silos with a conical hopper in accordance with Eurocode and DBN V.2.6-221:2021, as well as clarification of “special” points that are not properly covered in both regulations. Conclusion. The recommendations and explanations given in the article, firstly, accelerate the introduction of the new DBN V.2.6-221:2021 into engineering practice, which is harmonized with the Eurocode system, and secondly, allow to achieve more reliable and safe design solutions in the field of silos fabrication, in thirdly, they deactivate the chronic design fear of Ukrainian engineer before the European school of building standards.","PeriodicalId":228894,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30838/j.bpsacea.2312.280223.59.919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem statement. Today, the food security of the world is one of the main issues for the political, economic and scientific community, and the recent crisis with the export of Ukrainian grain only intensifies the urgency of the problem. The important part of this issue is creation of reliable and safe grain storage silos. An analysis of recent accidents in silos, especially with conical hoppers, revealed a range of imperfections in outdated regulatory practices that Ukraine inherited from the Soviet building norm system. A limited list of agricultural crops, ignoring the statistical spread of their physical and mechanical characteristics, not differentiating between the stress-strain state for filling and discharge silos, the absolute absence of guidelines and recommendations for the design of principal connections - this is a far from complete list of shortcomings and omissions of outdated Soviet standards. With the entry into force of the new Ukrainian norm DBN V.2.6-221:2021 “Designs of steel silos with a corrugated wall for grain”, the situation should have changed. Firstly, the new standards take into account the world experience in design, construction and fabrication of silos, and secondly, they have a direct and legitimate reference to the necessary standards of the Eurocode system, in which a modern engineer can find answers to a wide range of practical questions. Unfortunately, the introduction of this, without exaggeration, modern and extremely important standard into construction practice is constantly ignored. On the one hand, this is due to the unwillingness of Ukrainian manufacturers to switch to new European and more rigid requirements for reliability and safety, on the other hand, the fear of Ukrainian engineers in front of the complex and extensive Eurocode standardization system. The purpose of the article (ignoring the financial commercialism of individual silo manufacturers) is explain to domestic designers a few provisions of the new DBN V.2.6-221:2021 related to the design of silos with a conical hopper. In particular, the design of one of the very important units at the point of transition of the cylindrical part of the silo to the conical hopper. Methodology. For this, the general ideology and methodology of the limit state method, implemented in the Eurocode standards through the system of partial reliability factors, as well as classical methods of structural mechanics, which are still not reflected in the system of building regulation of modern Ukraine, are used. Results. As a result, clear recommendations for the design of the transition junction of silos with a conical hopper in accordance with Eurocode and DBN V.2.6-221:2021, as well as clarification of “special” points that are not properly covered in both regulations. Conclusion. The recommendations and explanations given in the article, firstly, accelerate the introduction of the new DBN V.2.6-221:2021 into engineering practice, which is harmonized with the Eurocode system, and secondly, allow to achieve more reliable and safe design solutions in the field of silos fabrication, in thirdly, they deactivate the chronic design fear of Ukrainian engineer before the European school of building standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按欧洲标准设计筒仓锥形料斗过渡节点
问题陈述。今天,世界粮食安全是政治、经济和科学界的主要问题之一,最近乌克兰粮食出口的危机只会加剧这一问题的紧迫性。这个问题的重要部分是建立可靠和安全的粮食储存筒仓。对近期筒仓事故(尤其是锥形料斗)的分析显示,乌克兰从苏联建筑规范体系中继承的过时监管做法存在一系列缺陷。一份有限的农作物清单,忽略了其物理和机械特性的统计分布,没有区分填充和排放筒仓的应力-应变状态,绝对没有设计主要连接的指导方针和建议-这远远不是苏联过时标准的缺点和遗漏的全部清单。随着乌克兰新规范DBN V.2.6-221:2021“谷物波纹壁钢筒仓设计”的生效,情况应该有所改变。首先,新标准考虑到世界在筒仓设计、建造和制造方面的经验,其次,它们直接和合法地参考了欧洲规范系统的必要标准,现代工程师可以在其中找到广泛的实际问题的答案。不幸的是,毫不夸张地说,将这一现代且极其重要的标准引入建筑实践中,却一直被忽视。一方面,这是由于乌克兰制造商不愿意转向新的欧洲和更严格的可靠性和安全性要求,另一方面,乌克兰工程师在复杂而广泛的欧洲规范标准化体系面前的恐惧。本文的目的(忽略单个筒仓制造商的财务商业化)是向国内设计师解释新DBN V.2.6-221:2021中与锥形料斗筒仓设计相关的一些规定。特别是筒仓筒体部分向锥形料斗过渡点处的一个非常重要的单元的设计。方法。为此,使用了欧洲规范标准中通过部分可靠度因素体系实施的极限状态法的一般思想和方法,以及现代乌克兰建筑法规体系中尚未体现的结构力学经典方法。结果。因此,根据欧洲法规和DBN V.2.6-221:2021,对带有锥形料斗的筒仓过渡连接处的设计提出了明确的建议,并澄清了两个法规中未适当涵盖的“特殊”点。结论。文章中给出的建议和解释,首先,加速将新的DBN V.2.6-221:2021引入工程实践,这与欧洲规范系统相协调,其次,允许在筒仓制造领域实现更可靠和安全的设计解决方案,第三,它们消除了乌克兰工程师在欧洲建筑标准学校之前的长期设计恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
NEURAL NETWORKS IN ARCHITECTURE: FROM IDEA TO IMPLEMENTATION POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION FEATURES OF EQUIPMENT FOR RADONOMETRY OF BOTTOM SEDIMENTS ON THE SEA SHELF DURING RESEARCH AT SHORE NPP SITES CALCULATED DETERMINATION OF CHARACTERISTICS OF SHRINKAGE AND TOUCH OF CONCRETE RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE THICKNESS AND THE STRUCTURAL CONDITION OF ROLLED METAL FROM LOW-CARBON LOW-ALLOY STEEL 10G2FB THE INFLUENCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES ON THE PROCESS OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1