R&D coordination in standard setting organizations: The role of consortia

Justus Baron, Yann Ménière, T. Pohlmann
{"title":"R&D coordination in standard setting organizations: The role of consortia","authors":"Justus Baron, Yann Ménière, T. Pohlmann","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2011.6083599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze R&D competition and cooperation between firms involved in the development of a technology standard. Our model captures two types of incentives these firms are subject to: free-riding due to the public good nature of the standard and patent races in order to derive royalties from essential patents. As a consequence, R&D may be excessive or insufficient as compared to the collective optimum. Our goal is to test if consortia can address any type of inefficiency, by either reducing or increasing collective R&D investment. We address this question empirically on a large dataset of ICT standards, by assessing the effect of consortia on the number of standard-related patents filed by companies. After sorting standards entailing over or underinvestment, our results confirm that in the first case consortia have a chilling effect on patent filings, while it has an inflating effect in the second case.","PeriodicalId":386043,"journal":{"name":"2011 7th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 7th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2011.6083599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We analyze R&D competition and cooperation between firms involved in the development of a technology standard. Our model captures two types of incentives these firms are subject to: free-riding due to the public good nature of the standard and patent races in order to derive royalties from essential patents. As a consequence, R&D may be excessive or insufficient as compared to the collective optimum. Our goal is to test if consortia can address any type of inefficiency, by either reducing or increasing collective R&D investment. We address this question empirically on a large dataset of ICT standards, by assessing the effect of consortia on the number of standard-related patents filed by companies. After sorting standards entailing over or underinvestment, our results confirm that in the first case consortia have a chilling effect on patent filings, while it has an inflating effect in the second case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准制定组织中的研发协调:联盟的作用
我们分析了参与技术标准开发的企业之间的研发竞争与合作。我们的模型抓住了这些公司受到的两种激励:由于标准的公共产品性质而搭便车,以及为了从基本专利中获得版税而进行的专利竞赛。因此,与集体最优相比,研发可能是过度的,也可能是不足的。我们的目标是测试财团是否可以通过减少或增加集体研发投资来解决任何类型的低效率问题。我们通过评估联盟对公司提交的标准相关专利数量的影响,在一个大型ICT标准数据集上实证地解决了这个问题。在对投资过多或投资不足的标准进行分类后,我们的结果证实,在第一种情况下,财团对专利申请有寒蝉效应,而在第二种情况下,财团有膨胀效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
R&D coordination in standard setting organizations: The role of consortia Showcase: A database for standards and patents Configuration management of a system of interdependent standards Technology standards battles and business networks during the technology life cycle: Propositions and a plan for further research Making innovation happen: The role of standards and openness in an innovation-friendly ecosystem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1