War in Minds. Review of the book by Maciej Gorny “Welka wojna profesorow. Nauki o czlowieku (1912–1923)” [Russ. ed.: M. Gurnyi «Velikaya voina professorov. Gumanitarnye nauki. 1912–1923»]

A. Vaganov
{"title":"War in Minds. Review of the book by Maciej Gorny “Welka wojna profesorow. Nauki o czlowieku (1912–1923)” [Russ. ed.: M. Gurnyi «Velikaya voina professorov. Gumanitarnye nauki. 1912–1923»]","authors":"A. Vaganov","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental research of Maciej Gurny, professor at the Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Berlin, is reviewed. Professor Gurny’s book is devoted to a phenomenon known in the historiography of the 20th century as “Krieg der Geister”. This seemingly invisible and bloodless war belongs only to the sphere of ideas. However, the scientific forces that were involved in this “Krieg der Geister”, as the author shows, directly influenced the origins, the course, and the consequences of the hot war – the World War I. These spheres are geography, racial anthropology, psychology and psychiatry. The monograph shows the role of the intellectuals of the region of Central-Eastern Europe and the Balkans in mobilizing the ideological (moral) and material resources of the warring countries. Having processed a huge array of information (about 1000 references to sources), M. Gurny notices a number of very interesting nuances in the topic under study. At the same time, one of the shortcomings of the book, in the opinion of the reviewer, is the absolutely insufficient use of Russian sources devoted to the phenomenon of “Krieg der Geister”. And those exist in not small numbers. One can argue with many of the conclusions that M. Gurny makes, but one of the undoubted advantages of the monograph is the return to the Russian intellectual space of many forgotten, but, paradoxically, historical plots that are relevant today.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fundamental research of Maciej Gurny, professor at the Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Berlin, is reviewed. Professor Gurny’s book is devoted to a phenomenon known in the historiography of the 20th century as “Krieg der Geister”. This seemingly invisible and bloodless war belongs only to the sphere of ideas. However, the scientific forces that were involved in this “Krieg der Geister”, as the author shows, directly influenced the origins, the course, and the consequences of the hot war – the World War I. These spheres are geography, racial anthropology, psychology and psychiatry. The monograph shows the role of the intellectuals of the region of Central-Eastern Europe and the Balkans in mobilizing the ideological (moral) and material resources of the warring countries. Having processed a huge array of information (about 1000 references to sources), M. Gurny notices a number of very interesting nuances in the topic under study. At the same time, one of the shortcomings of the book, in the opinion of the reviewer, is the absolutely insufficient use of Russian sources devoted to the phenomenon of “Krieg der Geister”. And those exist in not small numbers. One can argue with many of the conclusions that M. Gurny makes, but one of the undoubted advantages of the monograph is the return to the Russian intellectual space of many forgotten, but, paradoxically, historical plots that are relevant today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文回顾了柏林波兰科学院历史研究所的马切伊·格尼教授的基础研究。Gurny教授的书致力于研究20世纪史学中被称为“Krieg der Geister”的现象。这场似乎看不见的、不流血的战争只属于思想领域。然而,正如作者所指出的,参与这场“战争”的科学力量直接影响了热战——第一次世界大战的起源、进程和后果。这些领域是地理学、种族人类学、心理学和精神病学。这本专著展示了中东欧和巴尔干地区的知识分子在动员交战国家的思想(道德)和物质资源方面的作用。在处理了大量的信息(大约1000个参考资料)之后,Gurny注意到在研究的主题中有许多非常有趣的细微差别。与此同时,在评论家看来,这本书的缺点之一是,对“克里格·德·吉斯特”现象的俄罗斯来源的使用绝对不足。这些人的数量并不少。人们可以对格尼得出的许多结论提出异议,但这本专著的一个毋庸置疑的优点是,它将许多被遗忘的历史情节重新带回了俄罗斯的知识空间,而这些情节在今天与我们息息相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1 Jurisprudence for the Development of Science: Ideas that Should Not Be Forgotten (To the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF) The State Policy of the USSR in Relation to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in the Second Half of the 20th Century. The Organizational and Legal Aspect Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Russian Economy: A Practitioner’s View Digitalization of Public Administration and Economy: Terminological Clarity as a Factor of Success of Digital Development. Review of the Textbook “Digital State and Economy” Edited by S. E. Prokofiev, O. V. Panina and K. V. Kharchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1