On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1

Vladimir Krivoruchko
{"title":"On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1","authors":"Vladimir Krivoruchko","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2024.6.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the details of ideas and proposals announced by the author in 2021 within the framework of the round table of the “Science Management: Theory and Practice” journal (on the topic “Science in an Innovative Economy”). The proposed measures are considered as increasingly relevant in the face of the long-term confrontation with the ‘collective West’ which is striving for scientific and technological isolation of contemporary Russia.\nThe first part of the article gives an overview of the developments and trends observed both among Russian researchers, including scholars in science studies, and in the field of state regulation of scientific, academic and technological activities, as well as provides a critical analysis of organizational and legal aspects and practices of interaction between models of a ‘qualified customer’ and a ‘qualified contractor’ of scientific research and development. According to the results of the analysis, the author justifies the conclusion about the need for separation of scientific activities in present-day Russia.\nSeparation is understood as the process of concentration and rational differentiation of the proper ‘scientific’ and then scientific and technological activities from the related quasi-scientific fields. The appropriate legal and organizational measures serve as the separator (separation mechanism) in this context. It is proposed to develop and implement them in the near future with the direct participation of Russian researchers endowed with state responsibility and the appropriate powers and authority.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"113 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the details of ideas and proposals announced by the author in 2021 within the framework of the round table of the “Science Management: Theory and Practice” journal (on the topic “Science in an Innovative Economy”). The proposed measures are considered as increasingly relevant in the face of the long-term confrontation with the ‘collective West’ which is striving for scientific and technological isolation of contemporary Russia. The first part of the article gives an overview of the developments and trends observed both among Russian researchers, including scholars in science studies, and in the field of state regulation of scientific, academic and technological activities, as well as provides a critical analysis of organizational and legal aspects and practices of interaction between models of a ‘qualified customer’ and a ‘qualified contractor’ of scientific research and development. According to the results of the analysis, the author justifies the conclusion about the need for separation of scientific activities in present-day Russia. Separation is understood as the process of concentration and rational differentiation of the proper ‘scientific’ and then scientific and technological activities from the related quasi-scientific fields. The appropriate legal and organizational measures serve as the separator (separation mechanism) in this context. It is proposed to develop and implement them in the near future with the direct participation of Russian researchers endowed with state responsibility and the appropriate powers and authority.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论当代俄罗斯科学活动的分离与科学管理的国有公司形式》。第一部分
文章详细介绍了作者 2021 年在《科学管理:理论与实践 "杂志圆桌会议(主题为 "创新经济中的科学")上宣布的想法和建议的细节。文章第一部分概述了包括科学研究学者在内的俄罗斯研究人员以及国家科学、学术和技术活动监管领域的发展和趋势,并对科学研究和开发的 "合格客户 "和 "合格承包商 "模式之间互动的组织和法律方面及实践进行了批判性分析。根据分析结果,作者得出了当今俄罗斯科学活动需要分离的结论。"分离 "被理解为适当的 "科学 "活动以及科技活动与相关准科学领域的集中和合理区分过程。在这种情况下,适当的法律和组织措施起到了分离器(分离机制)的作用。建议在不久的将来,在被赋予国家责任和适当权力和权威的俄罗斯研究人员的直接参与下,制定和实施这些措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1 Jurisprudence for the Development of Science: Ideas that Should Not Be Forgotten (To the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF) The State Policy of the USSR in Relation to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in the Second Half of the 20th Century. The Organizational and Legal Aspect Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Russian Economy: A Practitioner’s View Digitalization of Public Administration and Economy: Terminological Clarity as a Factor of Success of Digital Development. Review of the Textbook “Digital State and Economy” Edited by S. E. Prokofiev, O. V. Panina and K. V. Kharchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1