A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PQRST AND SQ3R STRATEGIES BASED ON THE TEXT TYPES UPON THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPETENCY AT SMPN 4 SINGARAJA

Komang Dedy Sandiarsa Sari, D. K. Tantra, N. M. Ratminingsih
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PQRST AND SQ3R STRATEGIES BASED ON THE TEXT TYPES UPON THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPETENCY AT SMPN 4 SINGARAJA","authors":"Komang Dedy Sandiarsa Sari, D. K. Tantra, N. M. Ratminingsih","doi":"10.33394/jo-elt.v1i1.2401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed at investigating whether or not there is a different effect between PQRST and SQ3R strategies based on the text types upon the eighth grade students’ reading competency. This research was an experimental research with 2 X 2 factorial designs. The population was 6 classes (179 students) of grade VIII in SMPN 4 Singaraja in the academic year 2012/2013, in which 4 classes were sample of this research which was assigned into two groups, two classes with 60 students were PQRST strategy group, and two classes with 60 students were SQ3R strategy group determined by using a Multistage Random Sampling. The data were collected through reading comprehension test that were analyzed by using Statistical Two-Way ANOVA. The result shows that, first, FA = 31.533 with the significant value was 0.000 which was less than 0.5, therefore, there is a significance difference between the students who were taught by PQRST strategy than those who were taught by SQ3R strategy. Second, FAB = 2.624 with the significant value was 0.107 which was higher than 0.5, therefore, there is no interactional effect of teaching reading strategies (PQRST and SQ3R) and text types (narrative and recount) on students’ reading competency. ","PeriodicalId":125733,"journal":{"name":"Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v1i1.2401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This research aimed at investigating whether or not there is a different effect between PQRST and SQ3R strategies based on the text types upon the eighth grade students’ reading competency. This research was an experimental research with 2 X 2 factorial designs. The population was 6 classes (179 students) of grade VIII in SMPN 4 Singaraja in the academic year 2012/2013, in which 4 classes were sample of this research which was assigned into two groups, two classes with 60 students were PQRST strategy group, and two classes with 60 students were SQ3R strategy group determined by using a Multistage Random Sampling. The data were collected through reading comprehension test that were analyzed by using Statistical Two-Way ANOVA. The result shows that, first, FA = 31.533 with the significant value was 0.000 which was less than 0.5, therefore, there is a significance difference between the students who were taught by PQRST strategy than those who were taught by SQ3R strategy. Second, FAB = 2.624 with the significant value was 0.107 which was higher than 0.5, therefore, there is no interactional effect of teaching reading strategies (PQRST and SQ3R) and text types (narrative and recount) on students’ reading competency. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于文本类型的PQRST和sq3r策略对八年级学生阅读能力影响的比较研究
本研究旨在探讨基于文本类型的PQRST策略和SQ3R策略对八年级学生阅读能力的影响是否存在差异。本研究为2 × 2因子设计的实验研究。总体为2012/2013学年新加坡中学八年级6个班(179名学生),其中4个班为本研究样本,分为两组,两个班60名学生为PQRST策略组,两个班60名学生为SQ3R策略组,采用多阶段随机抽样确定。通过阅读理解测试收集数据,采用统计双因素方差分析进行分析。结果表明,首先,FA = 31.533,显著值为0.000,小于0.5,因此,采用PQRST策略教学的学生与采用SQ3R策略教学的学生之间存在显著性差异。第二,FAB = 2.624,显著值为0.107,高于0.5,说明教学阅读策略(PQRST和SQ3R)与文本类型(叙事和叙述)对学生阅读能力的影响不存在交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Implementation of Literacy Culture Programs in Elementary School Investigating the Implementation of Classroom Assessment by Novice English Teachers The English Speaking Competency and Challenges for BIPA Teachers Project-Based Learning for Mechanical Engineering Students in the Emergency Remote Teaching Square Talks®: A Mobile App to Support EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1