AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF THERMAL MODELLING TECHNIQUES FOR IGBT MODULES IN ELECTRICAL DRIVETRAINS

L. Hallemans, J. Zwysen, S. Ravyts, G. Van den Broeck, S. Schlimpert, G. Beckers, J. Driesen
{"title":"AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF THERMAL MODELLING TECHNIQUES FOR IGBT MODULES IN ELECTRICAL DRIVETRAINS","authors":"L. Hallemans, J. Zwysen, S. Ravyts, G. Van den Broeck, S. Schlimpert, G. Beckers, J. Driesen","doi":"10.1049/icp.2021.1098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to a strong drive towards a higher power density of electrical drivetrains and the impact of cooling on their reliability, the thermal characterisation and monitoring of these systems is gaining importance. The power electronic devices driving the electrical motor in this system are often integrated within one power module, complicating temperature measurements and monitoring of the semiconductor devices. Therefore, accurate thermal models of these modules are necessary. The main challenge remains to model these thermal properties sufficiently accurate to estimate the device temperatures, while maintaining an evaluation speed fast enough to ensure safe operating temperatures in real-time. Furthermore, in the search for enhanced cooling methods, it may be interesting to compare cooling designs using simulations before or instead of experiments. To this end, this paper develops and compares the accuracy of a 3D grey-box Lumped Parameter Model of an IGBT module coupled with an interchangeable cooling model with two 1D Lumped Parameter Models. The 3D model is based on a Finite Element representation, while the 1D models are based solely on datasheet information. The different model types are discussed and compared regarding their accuracy using simulation and experimental results.","PeriodicalId":188371,"journal":{"name":"The 10th International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2020)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 10th International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.1098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to a strong drive towards a higher power density of electrical drivetrains and the impact of cooling on their reliability, the thermal characterisation and monitoring of these systems is gaining importance. The power electronic devices driving the electrical motor in this system are often integrated within one power module, complicating temperature measurements and monitoring of the semiconductor devices. Therefore, accurate thermal models of these modules are necessary. The main challenge remains to model these thermal properties sufficiently accurate to estimate the device temperatures, while maintaining an evaluation speed fast enough to ensure safe operating temperatures in real-time. Furthermore, in the search for enhanced cooling methods, it may be interesting to compare cooling designs using simulations before or instead of experiments. To this end, this paper develops and compares the accuracy of a 3D grey-box Lumped Parameter Model of an IGBT module coupled with an interchangeable cooling model with two 1D Lumped Parameter Models. The 3D model is based on a Finite Element representation, while the 1D models are based solely on datasheet information. The different model types are discussed and compared regarding their accuracy using simulation and experimental results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电力传动系统中光模块热建模技术的实验比较
由于对电力传动系统更高功率密度的强烈需求以及冷却对其可靠性的影响,这些系统的热特性和监测变得越来越重要。在该系统中,驱动电动机的电力电子器件通常集成在一个电源模块中,使半导体器件的温度测量和监控变得复杂。因此,这些模块的精确热模型是必要的。主要的挑战仍然是建立足够精确的热特性模型,以估计设备温度,同时保持足够快的评估速度,以确保实时的安全操作温度。此外,在寻找增强冷却方法时,在实验之前或代替实验使用模拟来比较冷却设计可能会很有趣。为此,本文开发了IGBT模块的三维灰盒集总参数模型,并将其与可互换冷却模型和两种一维集总参数模型的精度进行了比较。3D模型基于有限元表示,而1D模型仅基于数据表信息。讨论了不同的模型类型,并通过仿真和实验结果比较了它们的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A NEW FOUR-QUADRANT INVERTER BASED ON DUAL-WINDING ISOLATED CUK CONVERTERS FOR RAILWAY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY APPLICATIONS PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE TEMPERATURE ESTIMATION USING LOW-ORDER LUMPED-PARAMETER THERMAL NETWORK WITH EXTENDED IRON LOSS MODEL THERMAL DC TEST AND ANALYSIS OF A STATOR MADE WITH RESIN TRICKLE IMPREGNATION OPTIMISATION OF THE GATE VOLTAGE IN SiC MOSFETS: EFFICIENCY VS RELIABILITY AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF THERMAL MODELLING TECHNIQUES FOR IGBT MODULES IN ELECTRICAL DRIVETRAINS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1