Human’s Reaction Time Based Score Calculation of Self-practice Dynamic Yoga System for User’s Feedback by OpenPose and Fuzzy Rules

Wan-Chia Huang, Cheng-Liang Shih, I. T. Anggraini, N. Funabiki, Chih-Peng Fan
{"title":"Human’s Reaction Time Based Score Calculation of Self-practice Dynamic Yoga System for User’s Feedback by OpenPose and Fuzzy Rules","authors":"Wan-Chia Huang, Cheng-Liang Shih, I. T. Anggraini, N. Funabiki, Chih-Peng Fan","doi":"10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the proposed self-practice dynamic Yoga system at home with instructor-user synchronization provided a new score calculation as user’s feedback. By following the guide of the instructor’s video, a proper score feedback indicates whether the user’s dynamic Yoga is good or bad, and helps users to understand how to improve their movements and postures. In the new score calculation, it considers two types of scores. The first type of scores is \"Shape_scores\", and the system compared the similarity of static postures between the instructor and user, and then the \"Shape_scores\" is calculated through the scoring system based on fuzzy rules with the angle difference values between the instructor and user. The second type of scores is \"Delay_scores\" by appending on the human’s average reaction time and average recognition time as thresholds to set the five different regions to give the scores for delays. By weighting these two scores and then summing them up, a new score is calculated finally. In the experimental results, the score schemes between the \"Shape_scores\" and the \"Delay_scores\" are discussed, and the tester is a lazy mode user who means the user simulates the elderly to observe the influence on the two different scores calculations.","PeriodicalId":332586,"journal":{"name":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study, the proposed self-practice dynamic Yoga system at home with instructor-user synchronization provided a new score calculation as user’s feedback. By following the guide of the instructor’s video, a proper score feedback indicates whether the user’s dynamic Yoga is good or bad, and helps users to understand how to improve their movements and postures. In the new score calculation, it considers two types of scores. The first type of scores is "Shape_scores", and the system compared the similarity of static postures between the instructor and user, and then the "Shape_scores" is calculated through the scoring system based on fuzzy rules with the angle difference values between the instructor and user. The second type of scores is "Delay_scores" by appending on the human’s average reaction time and average recognition time as thresholds to set the five different regions to give the scores for delays. By weighting these two scores and then summing them up, a new score is calculated finally. In the experimental results, the score schemes between the "Shape_scores" and the "Delay_scores" are discussed, and the tester is a lazy mode user who means the user simulates the elderly to observe the influence on the two different scores calculations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人的反应时间的自我练习动态瑜伽系统的开放性和模糊规则评分计算
在本研究中,所提出的教师与用户同步的家庭自我练习动态瑜伽系统提供了一种新的分数计算方法作为用户的反馈。在教练视频的指导下,适当的分数反馈可以显示用户的动态瑜伽是好是坏,并帮助用户了解如何改进自己的动作和姿势。在新的分数计算中,它考虑两种类型的分数。第一类分数为“Shape_scores”,系统比较教练和用户静态姿势的相似度,然后通过基于模糊规则的评分系统计算出教练和用户之间的角度差值。第二种类型的分数是“Delay_scores”,通过附加人类的平均反应时间和平均识别时间作为阈值来设置五个不同的区域,以给出延迟分数。通过对这两个分数进行加权,然后将它们相加,最后计算出一个新的分数。在实验结果中,讨论了“Shape_scores”和“Delay_scores”之间的评分方案,测试者为懒惰模式用户,即用户模拟老年人,观察两种不同的评分计算方式对得分的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Deep Learning to Track Representational Flexibility Development of Children with Autism in a Virtual World Emotional Responses toward the Flipped Classroom Approach across Academic Disciplines Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the (Java) Object-Oriented Programming Courses Human’s Reaction Time Based Score Calculation of Self-practice Dynamic Yoga System for User’s Feedback by OpenPose and Fuzzy Rules Using 360 Virtual Reality Video in History Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1