Effects of Outlier Flow Field on the Characteristics of In-Cylinder Coherent Structures Identified by POD-Based Conditional Averaging and Quadruple POD

R. Gao, Li Shen, Kwee-Yan Teh, Penghui Ge, Fengnian Zhao, D. Hung
{"title":"Effects of Outlier Flow Field on the Characteristics of In-Cylinder Coherent Structures Identified by POD-Based Conditional Averaging and Quadruple POD","authors":"R. Gao, Li Shen, Kwee-Yan Teh, Penghui Ge, Fengnian Zhao, D. Hung","doi":"10.1115/ICEF2018-9561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) offers an approach to quantify cycle-to-cycle variation (CCV) of the flow field inside the internal combustion engine cylinder. POD decomposes instantaneous flow fields (also called snapshots) into a series of orthonormal flow patterns (called POD modes) and the corresponding mode coefficients. The POD modes are rank-ordered by decreasing kinetic energy content, and the low-order, high-energy modes are interpreted as constituting the large-scale coherent flow structure that varies from engine cycle to engine cycle. Various POD-based analysis techniques have thus been proposed to characterize engine flow field CCV using these low-order modes. The validity of such POD-based analyses rests, as a matter of course, on the reliability of the underlying POD results (modes and coefficients). Yet a POD mode can be disproportionately skewed by a single outlier snapshot within a large data set, and an algorithm exists to define and identify such outliers. In this paper, the effects of a candidate outlier snapshot on the results of POD-based conditional averaging and quadruple POD analyses are examined for two sets of crank angle-resolved flow fields on the mid-tumble plane of an optical engine cylinder recorded by high-speed particle image velocimetry. The results with and without the candidate outlier are compared and contrasted. In the case of POD-based conditional averaging, the presence of the outlier scrambles the composition of snapshot subsets that define large-scale flow pattern variations, and thus substantially alters the coherent flow structures that are identified; for quadruple POD, the shape of coherent structures as well as the number of modes to define them are not significantly affected by the outlier.","PeriodicalId":441369,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2018-9561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) offers an approach to quantify cycle-to-cycle variation (CCV) of the flow field inside the internal combustion engine cylinder. POD decomposes instantaneous flow fields (also called snapshots) into a series of orthonormal flow patterns (called POD modes) and the corresponding mode coefficients. The POD modes are rank-ordered by decreasing kinetic energy content, and the low-order, high-energy modes are interpreted as constituting the large-scale coherent flow structure that varies from engine cycle to engine cycle. Various POD-based analysis techniques have thus been proposed to characterize engine flow field CCV using these low-order modes. The validity of such POD-based analyses rests, as a matter of course, on the reliability of the underlying POD results (modes and coefficients). Yet a POD mode can be disproportionately skewed by a single outlier snapshot within a large data set, and an algorithm exists to define and identify such outliers. In this paper, the effects of a candidate outlier snapshot on the results of POD-based conditional averaging and quadruple POD analyses are examined for two sets of crank angle-resolved flow fields on the mid-tumble plane of an optical engine cylinder recorded by high-speed particle image velocimetry. The results with and without the candidate outlier are compared and contrasted. In the case of POD-based conditional averaging, the presence of the outlier scrambles the composition of snapshot subsets that define large-scale flow pattern variations, and thus substantially alters the coherent flow structures that are identified; for quadruple POD, the shape of coherent structures as well as the number of modes to define them are not significantly affected by the outlier.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离群流场对基于POD的条件平均和四次POD识别缸内相干结构特性的影响
适当正交分解(POD)提供了一种量化内燃机缸内流场循环间变化(CCV)的方法。POD将瞬时流场(也称为快照)分解为一系列标准正交流型(称为POD模态)和相应的模态系数。POD模态通过降低动能含量进行排序,低阶高能量模态被解释为构成不同发动机循环周期的大尺度相干流结构。因此,人们提出了各种基于pod的分析技术,利用这些低阶模态来表征发动机流场CCV。当然,这种基于POD的分析的有效性取决于底层POD结果(模态和系数)的可靠性。然而,POD模式可能会被大型数据集中的单个异常值快照不成比例地扭曲,并且存在一种算法来定义和识别此类异常值。本文研究了用高速粒子图像测速法记录的光学发动机气缸中转鼓面上两组曲柄角分辨流场,考察了候选离群值快照对基于POD的条件平均和四次POD分析结果的影响。对有和没有候选异常值的结果进行比较和对比。在基于pod的条件平均的情况下,异常值的存在扰乱了定义大规模流型变化的快照子集的组成,从而大大改变了所识别的连贯流结构;对于四重POD,相干结构的形状以及定义它们的模态数量不受离群值的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GTL Kerosene and N-Butanol in RCCI Mode: Combustion and Emissions Investigation Emission and Combustion Characteristics of Diesel Engine Fumigated With Ammonia Effects of Outlier Flow Field on the Characteristics of In-Cylinder Coherent Structures Identified by POD-Based Conditional Averaging and Quadruple POD CI Engine Model Predictive Control With Availability Destruction Minimization Investigation of the Impact of Adding Titanium Dioxide to Jojoba Biodiesel-Diesel-N-Hexane Mixture on the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1