URGENSI PENGATURAN UNDANG-UNDANG PASAR FISIK ASET KRIPTO (CRYPTO ASSET)

Hans Christoper Krisnawangsa, Christian Tarapul Anjur Hasiholan, Made Dharma Aditya Adhyaksa, Lourenthya Fleurette Maspaitella
{"title":"URGENSI PENGATURAN UNDANG-UNDANG PASAR FISIK ASET KRIPTO (CRYPTO ASSET)","authors":"Hans Christoper Krisnawangsa, Christian Tarapul Anjur Hasiholan, Made Dharma Aditya Adhyaksa, Lourenthya Fleurette Maspaitella","doi":"10.28932/di.v13i1.3718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crypto Assets is a new alternative investment concept in Indonesia. The legal basis for regulating crypto assets currently in force in Indonesia cannot accommodate the development of the Crypto assets concept which continues to undergo significant changes. The physical market for crypto assets is incompatible when regulated by the provisions of Law Number 32 of 1997 on commodity futures trading and its amendments, namely Law Number 10 of 2011 because the physical market has conceptual differences with the provisions of the futures market in general. The object traded in the physical market is the commodity, while in the commodity futures market the object is futures contracts (and their derivatives) for commodities traded in the physical market. The scope of the commodity futures market as regulated in Article 1 of the Commodity Futures Trading Law does not accommodate commodity trading in the physical market. The urgency of regulating the physical market for crypto assets with a separate law is the implementation of the principle of legal certainty and protection of crypto asset investors. The method used in writing this journal is normative research using books, journal references, and laws and regulations that are relevant to the legal issues in this study. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of the physical law on crypto assets is needed because crypto assets should be regulated into two separate arrangements so that it is not appropriate if the regulation regarding crypto assets is only accommodated by the Commodity Futures Trading Law.","PeriodicalId":246508,"journal":{"name":"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i1.3718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Crypto Assets is a new alternative investment concept in Indonesia. The legal basis for regulating crypto assets currently in force in Indonesia cannot accommodate the development of the Crypto assets concept which continues to undergo significant changes. The physical market for crypto assets is incompatible when regulated by the provisions of Law Number 32 of 1997 on commodity futures trading and its amendments, namely Law Number 10 of 2011 because the physical market has conceptual differences with the provisions of the futures market in general. The object traded in the physical market is the commodity, while in the commodity futures market the object is futures contracts (and their derivatives) for commodities traded in the physical market. The scope of the commodity futures market as regulated in Article 1 of the Commodity Futures Trading Law does not accommodate commodity trading in the physical market. The urgency of regulating the physical market for crypto assets with a separate law is the implementation of the principle of legal certainty and protection of crypto asset investors. The method used in writing this journal is normative research using books, journal references, and laws and regulations that are relevant to the legal issues in this study. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of the physical law on crypto assets is needed because crypto assets should be regulated into two separate arrangements so that it is not appropriate if the regulation regarding crypto assets is only accommodated by the Commodity Futures Trading Law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加密资产的物理市场法规设置的紧迫性
加密资产是印度尼西亚的一种新的另类投资概念。印度尼西亚目前有效的监管加密资产的法律基础无法适应加密资产概念的发展,加密资产概念仍在经历重大变化。根据1997年关于商品期货交易的第32号法律及其修正案,即2011年第10号法律的规定,加密资产的实物市场是不相容的,因为实物市场与一般期货市场的规定存在概念上的差异。实物市场上交易的对象是商品,而商品期货市场上交易的对象是实物市场上交易的商品的期货合约(及其衍生品)。《商品期货交易法》第一条规定的商品期货市场范围,不包括实物市场的商品交易。用单独的法律规范加密资产的实物市场的紧迫性是实施法律确定性和保护加密资产投资者的原则。撰写本期刊的方法是使用与本研究中的法律问题相关的书籍、期刊参考文献和法律法规进行规范研究。本研究的结果表明,需要对加密资产的物理法律进行监管,因为加密资产应该被监管为两个单独的安排,因此,如果加密资产的监管只适用于商品期货交易法,这是不合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
URGENSI PENGATURAN UNDANG-UNDANG PASAR FISIK ASET KRIPTO (CRYPTO ASSET) TINJAUAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL TERKAIT PENETAPAN WILAYAH KONSERVASI OLEH INGGRIS TERHADAP KEPULAUAN CAGOS YANG MASIH DALAM PERSENGKETAAN DENGAN MAURITIUS MENAKAR PELUANG PELINDUNGAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS PADA BIDANG JASA DALAM KERANGKA HUKUM INDONESIA: SEBUAH DIAGNOSA AWAL PENCANTUMAN SERTIFIKAT KEANDALAN (LOGO TRUSTMARK) SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN E-COMMERCE DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN YANG BERLAKU PELINDUNGAN PATEN DALAM PERSPEKTIF FUNGSI HUKUM SEBAGAI KONTROL SOSIAL DAN REKAYASA SOSIAL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1