‘The Brixton Defence Campaign says boycott the Scarman Inquiry’

Simon Peplow
{"title":"‘The Brixton Defence Campaign says boycott the Scarman Inquiry’","authors":"Simon Peplow","doi":"10.7765/9781526125293.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses various responses to the Brixton disturbances; the authorities and media focussed upon criminality and law and order aspects, leading to repeated calls for the police to be further equipped to respond – but, due to the scale of events, a public inquiry was established. Hence, this chapter discusses Lord Scarman’s inquiry through in-depth examination of recently-released inquiry records, such as police radio messages and witness statements, and papers of grassroots political organisations, to explore numerous accusations of police misconduct not included in his Report, addressing some of the gaps between submitted evidence and what was published as official record. Scarman chose not to examine such accusations, suggesting his inquiry could not provide necessary safeguards and that allegations should be directed through the police complaints system; however, this system had lost the faith of marginalised groups, who believed it was ineffective. Conversely, many local groups, such as the Brixton Defence Campaign established to support those arrested in relation to the disorder, vociferously boycotted the inquiry as they believed it would be a ‘whitewash’ and that any evidence provided would actually be used against black defendants.","PeriodicalId":275693,"journal":{"name":"Race and riots in Thatcher's Britain","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race and riots in Thatcher's Britain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526125293.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter addresses various responses to the Brixton disturbances; the authorities and media focussed upon criminality and law and order aspects, leading to repeated calls for the police to be further equipped to respond – but, due to the scale of events, a public inquiry was established. Hence, this chapter discusses Lord Scarman’s inquiry through in-depth examination of recently-released inquiry records, such as police radio messages and witness statements, and papers of grassroots political organisations, to explore numerous accusations of police misconduct not included in his Report, addressing some of the gaps between submitted evidence and what was published as official record. Scarman chose not to examine such accusations, suggesting his inquiry could not provide necessary safeguards and that allegations should be directed through the police complaints system; however, this system had lost the faith of marginalised groups, who believed it was ineffective. Conversely, many local groups, such as the Brixton Defence Campaign established to support those arrested in relation to the disorder, vociferously boycotted the inquiry as they believed it would be a ‘whitewash’ and that any evidence provided would actually be used against black defendants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“布里克斯顿国防运动呼吁抵制斯卡曼调查”
本章讨论了对布里克斯顿骚乱的各种反应;当局和媒体把重点放在犯罪和法律和秩序方面,导致人们一再呼吁警察进一步装备以作出反应,但由于事件的规模,公众调查已经建立。因此,本章讨论了斯卡曼勋爵的调查,通过深入审查最近公布的调查记录,如警察无线电信息和证人陈述,以及基层政治组织的文件,探讨了他的报告中未包括的许多警察不当行为的指控,解决了提交的证据和官方记录之间的一些差距。斯卡曼选择不调查这些指控,暗示他的调查无法提供必要的保障,指控应该通过警方投诉系统进行;然而,这一制度已经失去了边缘群体的信任,他们认为这是无效的。相反,许多当地团体,如为支持与骚乱有关的被捕者而建立的布里克斯顿辩护运动(Brixton Defence Campaign),强烈抵制调查,因为他们认为这是“洗白”,所提供的任何证据实际上都会被用来指控黑人被告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘Who the hell’s defending if they’re going to walk out of here?’ The Moss Side Defence Committee Epilogue: ‘Turning point’ or ‘opportunity lost’? The legacy of 1980–81 A ‘conspicuous success’? Policing Liverpool and Manchester in July 1981 ‘The Brixton Defence Campaign says boycott the Scarman Inquiry’ ‘No other way to make their points of view known’? St Pauls, Bristol, 2 April 1980
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1