Shared Responsibility or Institutional Accountability? Continuing Conceptual and Enforcement Issues for Grievance Mechanisms of Public and Private International Finance Institutions

D. Ong
{"title":"Shared Responsibility or Institutional Accountability? Continuing Conceptual and Enforcement Issues for Grievance Mechanisms of Public and Private International Finance Institutions","authors":"D. Ong","doi":"10.1163/9789004372887_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution builds on one aspect of David Freestone’s academic writing that spanned his World Bank career, namely, the relationships between international and transnational actors on environmental issues. Due to the increasing role of environmental and social considerations within multilateral development finance, which David was instrumental in bringing about, there is a need to ensure that the relevant international/ transnational actors concerned are held accountable for their efforts to inculcate such considerations within institutional decisionmaking processes. This contribution therefore assesses the different legal and institutional means by which such accountability is brought about. In doing so, this contribution examines the role of a variety of actors within international development finance law, and in particular, the public and private international finance institutions (ifi s) involved with major infrastructure development projects that have socioeconomic and environmental impacts. In this regard, this contribution is also in keeping with David’s indefatigable efforts to advance the frontiers of knowledge in the international environmental law field. These efforts in turn stem from his abiding interest in securing justice for those that are deprived of access to environmental services due to the machinations of international/ transnational actors. The provision of environmental justice in this regard is especially pertinent as the role of private ifi s grows in the field of international development projects. By focussing on the institutional accountability of public and private ifi s in this context, this contribution both charts and engages with these new frontiers of international environmental law. Multiple international actors are now commonly involved in major natural resource and/ or infrastructure development projects, usually comprising a mix of State and international/ transnational nonState actors. These projects are","PeriodicalId":197250,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in International Environmental Law: Oceans and Climate Challenges","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in International Environmental Law: Oceans and Climate Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004372887_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This contribution builds on one aspect of David Freestone’s academic writing that spanned his World Bank career, namely, the relationships between international and transnational actors on environmental issues. Due to the increasing role of environmental and social considerations within multilateral development finance, which David was instrumental in bringing about, there is a need to ensure that the relevant international/ transnational actors concerned are held accountable for their efforts to inculcate such considerations within institutional decisionmaking processes. This contribution therefore assesses the different legal and institutional means by which such accountability is brought about. In doing so, this contribution examines the role of a variety of actors within international development finance law, and in particular, the public and private international finance institutions (ifi s) involved with major infrastructure development projects that have socioeconomic and environmental impacts. In this regard, this contribution is also in keeping with David’s indefatigable efforts to advance the frontiers of knowledge in the international environmental law field. These efforts in turn stem from his abiding interest in securing justice for those that are deprived of access to environmental services due to the machinations of international/ transnational actors. The provision of environmental justice in this regard is especially pertinent as the role of private ifi s grows in the field of international development projects. By focussing on the institutional accountability of public and private ifi s in this context, this contribution both charts and engages with these new frontiers of international environmental law. Multiple international actors are now commonly involved in major natural resource and/ or infrastructure development projects, usually comprising a mix of State and international/ transnational nonState actors. These projects are
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同责任还是机构问责?公共和私人国际金融机构申诉机制的持续概念和执行问题
这篇文章建立在David Freestone在世界银行工作期间学术写作的一个方面,即国际和跨国行为体在环境问题上的关系。由于环境和社会考虑因素在多边发展融资中所起的作用越来越大,因此有必要确保有关的国际/跨国行动者对其在体制决策过程中反复灌输这些考虑因素的努力负责。因此,本报告评估了实现这种问责制的不同法律和体制手段。在此过程中,本报告考察了国际发展金融法中各种行为体的作用,特别是涉及具有社会经济和环境影响的重大基础设施发展项目的公共和私营国际金融机构(ifi)。在这方面,这一贡献也与大卫在国际环境法领域推进知识前沿的不懈努力保持一致。这些努力又源于他对为那些由于国际/跨国行为者的阴谋而被剥夺获得环境服务机会的人争取正义的持久兴趣。随着私营金融机构在国际发展项目领域的作用日益增强,在这方面提供环境正义显得尤为重要。在这种背景下,通过关注公共和私营金融机构的机构问责制,这一贡献既描绘了国际环境法的这些新领域,也参与了这些新领域。现在通常有多个国际行为体参与重大自然资源和/或基础设施开发项目,通常包括国家和国际/跨国非国家行为体。这些项目是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shared Responsibility or Institutional Accountability? Continuing Conceptual and Enforcement Issues for Grievance Mechanisms of Public and Private International Finance Institutions Strategic Environmental Assessment and Its Application to Marine Areas beyond National Jurisdiction A New Frontier in the Law of the Sea? Responding to the Implications of Sea Level Rise for Baselines, Limits and Boundaries Taming the Wild North? High Seas Fisheries in the Warming Arctic The Anthropocene, Five Discourses and Frontier Space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1