Bericht aus der Praxis

S. Bellucci
{"title":"Bericht aus der Praxis","authors":"S. Bellucci","doi":"10.1515/9783839454534-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The school is seen as an important setting for tobacco prevention. What limitates the success of school-based preventive measures? Instruments and methods. In a naturalistic-controlled cohort study, N = 1359 students in fifth or sixth grade from college preparatory (“Gymnasium”), secondary modern (“Realschule”) or comprehensive secondary schools (“Gesamtschule”) participated in the universal educational program “Not smoking is cool!” (NiC). They were surveyed before the program as well as three and nine months after with standardized instruments on tobacco intake, academic achievements, and social behavior. Results. NiC is effective in “Gymnasium” fifth-/sixth graders but shows, as expected, small effect sizes. The percentage of new smokers increased more strongly in the “Gymnasium” control than in the “Gymnasium” intervention group. Pre-existing tobacco intake, academic achievements and behavioral difficulties influenced NiC’s effectiveness regardless of school type. Conclusions. Significant limitations on the effectiveness of a school-based tobacco prevention program in fifth-/sixth graders exist. These are risk factors that are not addressed by the intervention measure. NiC should be informed by selective and/or behaviourbased prevention program content when conducted in the less academically oriented secondary schools.","PeriodicalId":406437,"journal":{"name":"In digitaler Gesellschaft","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In digitaler Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839454534-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background. The school is seen as an important setting for tobacco prevention. What limitates the success of school-based preventive measures? Instruments and methods. In a naturalistic-controlled cohort study, N = 1359 students in fifth or sixth grade from college preparatory (“Gymnasium”), secondary modern (“Realschule”) or comprehensive secondary schools (“Gesamtschule”) participated in the universal educational program “Not smoking is cool!” (NiC). They were surveyed before the program as well as three and nine months after with standardized instruments on tobacco intake, academic achievements, and social behavior. Results. NiC is effective in “Gymnasium” fifth-/sixth graders but shows, as expected, small effect sizes. The percentage of new smokers increased more strongly in the “Gymnasium” control than in the “Gymnasium” intervention group. Pre-existing tobacco intake, academic achievements and behavioral difficulties influenced NiC’s effectiveness regardless of school type. Conclusions. Significant limitations on the effectiveness of a school-based tobacco prevention program in fifth-/sixth graders exist. These are risk factors that are not addressed by the intervention measure. NiC should be informed by selective and/or behaviourbased prevention program content when conducted in the less academically oriented secondary schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实习报告
背景。这所学校被视为预防吸烟的重要场所。是什么限制了学校预防措施的成功?仪器和方法。在一项自然对照队列研究中,N = 1359名来自大学预科(“Gymnasium”)、中等现代(“Realschule”)或综合中学(“Gesamtschule”)的五年级或六年级学生参加了“不吸烟很酷!””(NiC)。他们在项目开始前以及三个月和九个月后接受了关于烟草摄入量、学业成就和社会行为的标准化调查。结果。NiC在“体育馆”的五、六年级学生中很有效,但正如预期的那样,效果很小。“健身房”组的新吸烟者比例比“健身房”干预组增加得更多。已有的烟草摄入、学业成绩和行为困难影响着不同学校类型的NiC的有效性。结论。以学校为基础的五年级/六年级预防吸烟项目的有效性存在显著的局限性。这些是干预措施无法解决的风险因素。当在不太注重学术的中学进行时,NiC应该被告知选择性和/或基于行为的预防计划内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inhalt Frontmatter Einleitung Bericht aus der Praxis Reallabore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1