{"title":"Policy expertise and policy markets: challenges for tackling complex problems in turbulent times","authors":"B. Head","doi":"10.4337/9781800376489.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The market-place of policy ideas continues to become more diverse. This plurality of voices is welcome from the perspective of encouraging healthy and vigorous democratic debate, because multiple sources of information and advice could be valuable for addressing complex crises and contested policy problems. On the other hand, the platforms of policy debate and mediatised channels of opinion formation are often overwhelmed by shrill voices and powerful interests. Some of these are disdainful of science and expertise, and promote solutions based on opinions and rhetoric (‘post-truth’). Moreover, there has been a parallel decline in civic trust concerning public institutions and political elites. Can the policy sciences explain these inter-twined phenomena, especially under crisis conditions such as the Covid-19 pandemic? How can the policy sciences research agenda contribute to protecting and strengthening the role of best-available evidence in an inclusive policy process? Can research provide insights into how inclusion and transparency could assist in restoring public trust in high-quality decision-making?. © Anis Ben Brik and Leslie A. Pal 2021.","PeriodicalId":287034,"journal":{"name":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376489.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
政策专业知识和政策市场:在动荡时期应对复杂问题的挑战
政策理念的市场继续变得更加多样化。从鼓励健康和积极的民主辩论的角度来看,这种多元化的声音是受欢迎的,因为多种信息和咨询来源对于解决复杂的危机和有争议的政策问题可能很有价值。另一方面,政策辩论的平台和舆论形成的中介渠道往往被尖锐的声音和强大的利益所淹没。其中一些人蔑视科学和专业知识,提倡基于意见和修辞的解决方案(“后真相”)。此外,公众对公共机构和政治精英的信任也出现了相应的下降。政策科学能否解释这些相互交织的现象,特别是在Covid-19大流行等危机条件下?政策科学研究议程如何有助于保护和加强可获得的最佳证据在包容性政策进程中的作用?研究是否能提供关于包容性和透明度如何有助于恢复公众对高质量决策的信任的见解?©Anis Ben Brik and Leslie A. Pal 2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。