Pub Date : 2021-06-17DOI: 10.4337/9781800376489.00008
Anis ben Brik, L. Pal
As the third wave of the transboundary coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) drags on, policymakers and the public sector face their biggest test in generations—some say ever—as lives and livelihoods hang in a terrible, delicate balance. The COVID-19 pandemic, the most disruptive global event since the Great Depression and World War II, is involving many types of uncertainty: issues around data limitations; lack of consensus among experts and variations in expertise; the possibility of overand under-reactions; different levels of trust in government; technical know-how; political support for certain kinds of interventions, and many others (Capano et al., 2020). In addition, the pandemic is causing the deepest global economic downturn since the 2008 financial crisis, leading to unemployment, food insecurity, increased global poverty and inequality. The economic costs are staggering: much of the world has fallen into recession, public debt levels are soaring, and future growth prospects have dimmed. In addition, the coronavirus has accelerated existing trends toward nationalist populism, authoritarianism, and tense relations among countries, and specifically with China. The pandemic has exacerbated the retreat from globalization, and raised new barriers to international trade, investment, and travel. However, the coronavirus pandemic also provides windows of opportunity to re-examine the roles of government in society. The new, emerging role of governments will be one that takes a strong and active state as given, where policymakers are prepared to adopt harsh measures of control and “do whatever it takes” to maintain public health, public order, and a functioning economy. States may become the “ultimate bearer of major societal risks” (Roberts, 2020). The coronavirus pandemic is set to usher in a new era of bigger, more intrusive government. This kind of “protective state” implies more extensive social protection systems for a host of social, health, and economic threats, closer integration between states and markets, with states often taking a leading role, and a state administrative apparatus capable of managing this much more extensive agenda (Ansell, 2019). In many countries, science, expert knowledge, and evidence-based decisions have returned to their rightful place in government decisions and the demand for scientific and technical expertise has increased as governments and the public search for certainty in understanding problems and choosing responses. The result is an increased politicization of scientific and technical information (Weible et al., 2020). Even before becoming President, Joe Biden named 13 scientists and public health specialists to a COVID-19 advisory board. Biden said in a statement that the board will “help shape my approach to managing the surge in reported
随着第三波跨界冠状病毒大流行(COVID-19)的拖延,政策制定者和公共部门面临着几代人以来——有些人说是有史以来——最大的考验,人们的生活和生计处于一种可怕而微妙的平衡之中。COVID-19大流行是自大萧条和第二次世界大战以来最具破坏性的全球事件,涉及多种不确定性:数据限制问题;专家之间缺乏共识和专业知识的差异;反应过度和反应不足的可能性;对政府不同程度的信任;技术知识;对某些干预措施的政治支持,以及许多其他干预措施(Capano et al., 2020)。此外,疫情正在造成2008年金融危机以来最严重的全球经济衰退,导致失业、粮食不安全、全球贫困和不平等加剧。经济代价是惊人的:世界大部分地区陷入衰退,公共债务水平飙升,未来增长前景黯淡。此外,冠状病毒加速了民族主义民粹主义、威权主义和国家间关系紧张的现有趋势,特别是与中国的关系。大流行加剧了全球化的倒退,并为国际贸易、投资和旅行设置了新的障碍。然而,冠状病毒大流行也为重新审视政府在社会中的作用提供了机会。政府的新角色将是一个强大而活跃的国家,政策制定者准备采取严厉的控制措施,“不惜一切代价”维持公共卫生、公共秩序和经济运转。国家可能成为“重大社会风险的最终承担者”(Roberts, 2020)。冠状病毒大流行将迎来一个更大、更具干预性的政府的新时代。这种“保护性国家”意味着针对一系列社会、健康和经济威胁的更广泛的社会保护体系,国家与市场之间更紧密的融合,国家往往发挥主导作用,国家行政机构能够管理这一更广泛的议程(安塞尔,2019)。在许多国家,科学、专家知识和基于证据的决策已在政府决策中恢复其应有的地位,随着政府和公众在理解问题和选择对策方面寻求确定性,对科学和技术专门知识的需求有所增加。其结果是科技信息的政治化加剧(Weible et al., 2020)。早在成为总统之前,乔·拜登就任命了13名科学家和公共卫生专家加入新冠肺炎咨询委员会。拜登在一份声明中表示,该委员会将“帮助我制定管理报告中激增的方法”
{"title":"Introduction: futures, now and then","authors":"Anis ben Brik, L. Pal","doi":"10.4337/9781800376489.00008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376489.00008","url":null,"abstract":"As the third wave of the transboundary coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) drags on, policymakers and the public sector face their biggest test in generations—some say ever—as lives and livelihoods hang in a terrible, delicate balance. The COVID-19 pandemic, the most disruptive global event since the Great Depression and World War II, is involving many types of uncertainty: issues around data limitations; lack of consensus among experts and variations in expertise; the possibility of overand under-reactions; different levels of trust in government; technical know-how; political support for certain kinds of interventions, and many others (Capano et al., 2020). In addition, the pandemic is causing the deepest global economic downturn since the 2008 financial crisis, leading to unemployment, food insecurity, increased global poverty and inequality. The economic costs are staggering: much of the world has fallen into recession, public debt levels are soaring, and future growth prospects have dimmed. In addition, the coronavirus has accelerated existing trends toward nationalist populism, authoritarianism, and tense relations among countries, and specifically with China. The pandemic has exacerbated the retreat from globalization, and raised new barriers to international trade, investment, and travel. However, the coronavirus pandemic also provides windows of opportunity to re-examine the roles of government in society. The new, emerging role of governments will be one that takes a strong and active state as given, where policymakers are prepared to adopt harsh measures of control and “do whatever it takes” to maintain public health, public order, and a functioning economy. States may become the “ultimate bearer of major societal risks” (Roberts, 2020). The coronavirus pandemic is set to usher in a new era of bigger, more intrusive government. This kind of “protective state” implies more extensive social protection systems for a host of social, health, and economic threats, closer integration between states and markets, with states often taking a leading role, and a state administrative apparatus capable of managing this much more extensive agenda (Ansell, 2019). In many countries, science, expert knowledge, and evidence-based decisions have returned to their rightful place in government decisions and the demand for scientific and technical expertise has increased as governments and the public search for certainty in understanding problems and choosing responses. The result is an increased politicization of scientific and technical information (Weible et al., 2020). Even before becoming President, Joe Biden named 13 scientists and public health specialists to a COVID-19 advisory board. Biden said in a statement that the board will “help shape my approach to managing the surge in reported","PeriodicalId":287034,"journal":{"name":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114832873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-17DOI: 10.4337/9781800376489.00018
L. Pal, Anis ben Brik
{"title":"Conclusion. Future tense: a new grammar for the policy sciences?","authors":"L. Pal, Anis ben Brik","doi":"10.4337/9781800376489.00018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376489.00018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287034,"journal":{"name":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124600076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-17DOI: 10.4337/9781800376489.00010
K. Hartley, Norainie Ahmad
{"title":"Neo-professionalization of the civil service: an institutional perspective on policy studies education","authors":"K. Hartley, Norainie Ahmad","doi":"10.4337/9781800376489.00010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376489.00010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287034,"journal":{"name":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122455408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-17DOI: 10.4337/9781800376489.00011
Michael Howlett, Darryl S. L. Jarvis
{"title":"Policy science beyond self-congratulatory virtue signalling: matching supply and demand in the scholarship, pedagogy and purpose of the policy enterprise","authors":"Michael Howlett, Darryl S. L. Jarvis","doi":"10.4337/9781800376489.00011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376489.00011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287034,"journal":{"name":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127802494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-17DOI: 10.4337/9781800376489.00013
Glen Kuecker, K. Hartley
{"title":"Disaster risk reduction and the development narrative: towards a new public policy epistemic","authors":"Glen Kuecker, K. Hartley","doi":"10.4337/9781800376489.00013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376489.00013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287034,"journal":{"name":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125432291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-17DOI: 10.4337/9781800376489.00014
A. Veselý
{"title":"Policy practices: a bridge between policy theory and empirical research","authors":"A. Veselý","doi":"10.4337/9781800376489.00014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376489.00014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287034,"journal":{"name":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128962224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4337/9781800376489.00016
A. Rechkemmer
{"title":"Back to the future: learning from the evolution of global sustainability governance","authors":"A. Rechkemmer","doi":"10.4337/9781800376489.00016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376489.00016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287034,"journal":{"name":"The Future of the Policy Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131045300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}