Book Reviews : Cities and natural processes. By M. Hough. London, Routledge. 1995. xviii + 326 pp. £50.00, cloth; £16.99, paper. ISBN 0 415 12168 X, cloth; 0 415 12198 1, paper
{"title":"Book Reviews : Cities and natural processes. By M. Hough. London, Routledge. 1995. xviii + 326 pp. £50.00, cloth; £16.99, paper. ISBN 0 415 12168 X, cloth; 0 415 12198 1, paper","authors":"J. C. Doornkamp","doi":"10.1177/147447409700400209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"impossible. It is also time to retrieve our history in radical geography rather than, as Rose does, only note its exclusions. Her review of the feminist debates in geography over the past two decades for instance made clear, quite unintentionally, how often key feminist articles and debates were published in Antipode (a journal of radical geography, not, as Rose claims, Marxist geography). While Antipode has had its masculinist silences and sexist editorial blind spots over the years, feminist geographers have much history to retrieve in its pages. Indeed, some of the","PeriodicalId":199648,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409700400209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
impossible. It is also time to retrieve our history in radical geography rather than, as Rose does, only note its exclusions. Her review of the feminist debates in geography over the past two decades for instance made clear, quite unintentionally, how often key feminist articles and debates were published in Antipode (a journal of radical geography, not, as Rose claims, Marxist geography). While Antipode has had its masculinist silences and sexist editorial blind spots over the years, feminist geographers have much history to retrieve in its pages. Indeed, some of the