MiFID II Unbundling and Sell Side Analyst Research

Mark Lang, Jedson Pinto, Edward Sul
{"title":"MiFID II Unbundling and Sell Side Analyst Research","authors":"Mark Lang, Jedson Pinto, Edward Sul","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3408198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the effect of MiFID II, which mandated the unbundling and separate pricing of analyst research in Europe beginning in 2018. We find that the requirements of MiFID II were associated with a reduction in analyst following for European firms relative to US firms, with decreases in coverage greatest for firms that were larger, older and less volatile, and had greater coverage and more accurate consensus forecasts. Remaining analysts follow fewer firms and issue fewer forecasts, consistent with increased focus, and appear to increase their efforts on the firms they continue to cover. In particular, forecasts become more accurate, are more likely to be disaggregated and include recommendations, and are accompanied by larger stock price reactions. Consistent with increased effort to curry favor with management, analysts issue more optimistic recommendations and beatable earnings forecasts. While individual forecasts are more informative, the overall information environment for the average firm tends to deteriorate, with less aggregate information conveyed by analyst forecasts, a greater proportion of information delayed to earnings announcements and higher average bid-ask spreads. Taken as a whole, results are consistent with a reduction in analyst following mitigated by an increase in focus and effort by remaining analysts, but with an overall negative effect on the information environment.","PeriodicalId":106038,"journal":{"name":"Other International Business & Management eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Other International Business & Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3408198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

We examine the effect of MiFID II, which mandated the unbundling and separate pricing of analyst research in Europe beginning in 2018. We find that the requirements of MiFID II were associated with a reduction in analyst following for European firms relative to US firms, with decreases in coverage greatest for firms that were larger, older and less volatile, and had greater coverage and more accurate consensus forecasts. Remaining analysts follow fewer firms and issue fewer forecasts, consistent with increased focus, and appear to increase their efforts on the firms they continue to cover. In particular, forecasts become more accurate, are more likely to be disaggregated and include recommendations, and are accompanied by larger stock price reactions. Consistent with increased effort to curry favor with management, analysts issue more optimistic recommendations and beatable earnings forecasts. While individual forecasts are more informative, the overall information environment for the average firm tends to deteriorate, with less aggregate information conveyed by analyst forecasts, a greater proportion of information delayed to earnings announcements and higher average bid-ask spreads. Taken as a whole, results are consistent with a reduction in analyst following mitigated by an increase in focus and effort by remaining analysts, but with an overall negative effect on the information environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MiFID II拆分和卖方分析师研究
我们研究了MiFID II的影响,该法案要求从2018年开始在欧洲对分析师研究进行分拆和单独定价。我们发现,与美国公司相比,MiFID II的要求与欧洲公司分析师追随的减少有关,对于规模更大、历史更悠久、波动性更小、覆盖范围更广、共识预测更准确的公司,覆盖范围的下降幅度最大。剩下的分析师关注的公司减少了,发布的预测也减少了,这与他们越来越关注的公司一致,而且似乎加大了对他们继续关注的公司的关注力度。特别是,预测变得更加准确,更有可能被分解并包含建议,并且伴随着更大的股价反应。与越来越多地讨好管理层的努力相一致,分析师们给出了更乐观的建议和更好的盈利预测。虽然个人预测的信息量更大,但一般公司的整体信息环境往往会恶化,分析师预测传达的汇总信息减少,延迟发布收益的信息比例更大,平均买卖价差更高。作为一个整体,结果与分析师跟随的减少是一致的,剩余分析师的关注和努力的增加减轻了这一点,但对信息环境产生了总体的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial Competency and Competitive Advantage of Hotels in Nigeria Tourism after Corona: Impacts of Covid 19 Pandemic and Way Forward for Tourism, Hotel and Mice Industry in Sri Lanka The Use of a Blue Ocean Marketing Strategy For Market Capture in the U.S: A Case Study of the Blujade Company MiFID II Unbundling and Sell Side Analyst Research The Study of the Key Factors in the Development of Chemical Distribution Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1