The Quietist’s Gambit

R. Mena
{"title":"The Quietist’s Gambit","authors":"R. Mena","doi":"10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2018.366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I develop a semantic theory of vagueness that is immune to worries regarding the use of precise mathematical tools. I call this view semantic quietism. This view has the advantage of being clearly compatible with the phenomenon of vagueness. The cost is that it cannot capture every robust semantic fact.","PeriodicalId":117174,"journal":{"name":"Crítica (México D. F. En línea)","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crítica (México D. F. En línea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2018.366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper I develop a semantic theory of vagueness that is immune to worries regarding the use of precise mathematical tools. I call this view semantic quietism. This view has the advantage of being clearly compatible with the phenomenon of vagueness. The cost is that it cannot capture every robust semantic fact.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安静主义者的策略
在本文中,我发展了一种语义模糊理论,它不受使用精确数学工具的担忧的影响。我称这种观点为语义静心主义。这种观点的优点是与模糊现象明显相容。代价是它不能捕获每一个健壮的语义事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justificación, normatividad e historia: sobre la idea de rememoración en A Spirit of Trust Fernando Broncano, Racionalidad, acción y opacidad. Sujetos vulnerables en tierras libres Outline of a Dialogical Theory of Truth Pureza del método y construcción de teorías: el caso de Kronecker y Dedekind en teoría algebraica de números Benjamin J.B. Lipscomb, The Women Are up to Something. How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1