Outline of a Dialogical Theory of Truth

Miguel Álvarez Lisboa
{"title":"Outline of a Dialogical Theory of Truth","authors":"Miguel Álvarez Lisboa","doi":"10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I propose two theories of truth and show how they deal with semantic paradoxes. Their most salient feature is that they are based on a gametheoretic understanding of logic and meaning. “Truth”, therefore, is understood dialogically, as agreement between parts. I compare this proposal with a similar one already existing in the literature —Dutilh Novaes and French 2018—, and highlight the advantages of mine. The theories of truth I present are non-trivial, substructural (in a sense to be clarified) and capture strong intuitions about truth. Some philosophical recommendations in favor of our understanding of Dialogics are delivered along the way.","PeriodicalId":117174,"journal":{"name":"Crítica (México D. F. En línea)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crítica (México D. F. En línea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay I propose two theories of truth and show how they deal with semantic paradoxes. Their most salient feature is that they are based on a gametheoretic understanding of logic and meaning. “Truth”, therefore, is understood dialogically, as agreement between parts. I compare this proposal with a similar one already existing in the literature —Dutilh Novaes and French 2018—, and highlight the advantages of mine. The theories of truth I present are non-trivial, substructural (in a sense to be clarified) and capture strong intuitions about truth. Some philosophical recommendations in favor of our understanding of Dialogics are delivered along the way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真理的对话理论大纲
在这篇文章中,我提出了两种真理理论,并展示了它们是如何处理语义悖论的。它们最显著的特点是基于对逻辑和意义的博弈论理解。“真理”,因此,被理解为对话,作为部分之间的协议。我将此提案与文献中已经存在的类似提案(dutilh Novaes and French 2018)进行了比较,并强调了我的优势。我所提出的真理理论是非平凡的、次结构的(在某种意义上有待澄清),并抓住了关于真理的强烈直觉。在此过程中,我们提出了一些有利于我们理解对话的哲学建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justificación, normatividad e historia: sobre la idea de rememoración en A Spirit of Trust Fernando Broncano, Racionalidad, acción y opacidad. Sujetos vulnerables en tierras libres Outline of a Dialogical Theory of Truth Pureza del método y construcción de teorías: el caso de Kronecker y Dedekind en teoría algebraica de números Benjamin J.B. Lipscomb, The Women Are up to Something. How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1