What's hot and what's not: Windowed developer topic analysis

Abram Hindle, Michael W. Godfrey, R. Holt
{"title":"What's hot and what's not: Windowed developer topic analysis","authors":"Abram Hindle, Michael W. Godfrey, R. Holt","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As development on a software project progresses, developers shift their focus between different topics and tasks many times. Managers and newcomer developers often seek ways of understanding what tasks have recently been worked on and how much effort has gone into each; for example, a manager might wonder what unexpected tasks occupied their team's attention during a period when they were supposed to have been implementing new features. Tools such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) can be used to extract a set of independent topics from a corpus of commit-log comments. Previous work in the area has created a single set of topics by analyzing comments from the entire lifetime of the project. In this paper, we propose windowing the topic analysis to give a more nuanced view of the system's evolution. By using a defined time-window of, for example, one month, we can track which topics come and go over time, and which ones recur. We propose visualizations of this model that allows us to explore the evolving stream of topics of development occurring over time. We demonstrate that windowed topic analysis offers advantages over topic analysis applied to a project's lifetime because many topics are quite local.","PeriodicalId":247441,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"125","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

Abstract

As development on a software project progresses, developers shift their focus between different topics and tasks many times. Managers and newcomer developers often seek ways of understanding what tasks have recently been worked on and how much effort has gone into each; for example, a manager might wonder what unexpected tasks occupied their team's attention during a period when they were supposed to have been implementing new features. Tools such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) can be used to extract a set of independent topics from a corpus of commit-log comments. Previous work in the area has created a single set of topics by analyzing comments from the entire lifetime of the project. In this paper, we propose windowing the topic analysis to give a more nuanced view of the system's evolution. By using a defined time-window of, for example, one month, we can track which topics come and go over time, and which ones recur. We propose visualizations of this model that allows us to explore the evolving stream of topics of development occurring over time. We demonstrate that windowed topic analysis offers advantages over topic analysis applied to a project's lifetime because many topics are quite local.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热门和不热门:windows开发人员主题分析
随着软件项目开发的进行,开发人员会多次在不同的主题和任务之间转移他们的关注点。管理人员和新开发人员经常寻找方法来了解最近完成了哪些任务以及每个任务投入了多少努力;例如,经理可能想知道,在他们应该实现新功能的一段时间里,是什么意外任务占用了他们团队的注意力。潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)和潜在语义索引(LSI)等工具可用于从提交日志评论语料库中提取一组独立的主题。该领域以前的工作通过分析来自项目整个生命周期的评论创建了一组主题。在本文中,我们建议打开主题分析的窗口,以提供系统演变的更细致入微的观点。通过使用一个定义的时间窗口,例如,一个月,我们可以跟踪哪些话题随着时间的推移而出现和消失,以及哪些话题反复出现。我们提出这个模型的可视化,使我们能够探索随着时间的推移而发生的发展主题的不断发展的流。我们证明了窗口主题分析比应用于项目生命周期的主题分析更有优势,因为许多主题都是相当局部的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive views for analyzing problem reports Recovering design rationale from email repositories Maintenance, or the 3rd dimension of eXtreme model-driven design What's hot and what's not: Windowed developer topic analysis On predicting the time taken to correct bug reports in open source projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1